NotHereToPlayGames
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by NotHereToPlayGames
-
-
1 hour ago, D.Draker said:
Are you familiar with the term "Unexpire" certain version flags?
Again, No Sh#T! Please stop this combative passive-aggressive BS!
Until you provide a flag-change that affects Speedometer 2.1 scores and demonstrate with a before-and-after score, then this is nothing more than HYPOTHESIS, plain and simple.
I do all of my Speedometer 2.1 scores in virgin, untouched profiles, with default profiles. That is a fair baseline, period!
1 -
18 minutes ago, D.Draker said:
they started to force WebGPU Flag to "always on", but in earlier versions it was OFF
IF (until I witness this either myself or you providing a screencap, then this shall be considered nothing more than Unproven Hypothesis), if this is true, then it happened before v122.
I'll submit that a flag here or there might possibly affect Speedometer 2.1 a *MAX* of 5 to 8 points or so, no more, but an affect of 15+, I personally doubt it very highly.
The "V8 Optimizer" or whatever it is called, yeah, 20+ if not 30+ or even 40+.
Which *EXACT* gpu flag are you implying affects browser performance? I will personally screencap before and after on your cited flags. Or you are welcome to post your own, of course.
Until I see it with my own eyes, then it is Unproven Hypothesis.
0 -
No sh#t. I'm comparing DEFAULT flags in v122 to DEFAULT flags in v134. Saying "it's public knowledge" is TALKING DOWN TO ME.
So at this point, I'm moving on. Please "fight" with somebody else. And yeah, this is "combative" and I fight fire with fire.
Moving on... "Toodles"...
0 -
47 minutes ago, D.Draker said:
It'd be important to tell which combination of flags was used.
Not important. No flag changes whatsoever. This would only come into play for something like Supermium where the developer changes flag defaults.
This is not some "enable flag for test #1", "disable flag for test #2".
0 -
Speedometer 2.1 dropped from 402 to 385 when testing a v134. So I shall stick with v122. To each their own, of course, but I shall take the speed over the hyped-up-security-vulnerabilities any day of the week.
0 -
We both know who the "guest" is. He was not banned. He *REQUESTED* to no longer be an MSFN Member. Something the admins *WILL NOT ALLOW ME TO DO*, I have requested *multiple times*.
YOU, Mr. D.Draker, is the *COMMON DENOMINATOR* in 99% of the BS that goes on here at MSFN. Admins don't care, so I guess I don't either. Or turn all of my posts into "guest" posts as well, I really don't care.
YOU, Mr. D.Draker, are allowed to stir up as much sh#t as you feel like. So yeah, if you can't beat 'em, join 'em". My turn to stir some sh#t. Yeah, it's that easy!
1 -
26 minutes ago, D.Draker said:
Vulnerabilities: 238
That I can agree to! A far cry from the one million you cited in your first "bs" post!
BUT your computer's "vulnerabilities" DON'T MEAN JACK SH&T TO MOST OF US HERE AT MSFN! The security of your computer only ties so much to your browser, the rest is all tied to your OS.
We probably have more XP users here than anything. Do you think they care how "insecure" XP is? REGARDLESS of how often somebody likes you comes along and reminds them of how many years old XP is!
Tons of Vista users here also. Do you think they care how "insecure" Vista is? Are they falsely deducing that an "extended kernel" patches these insecurities? Hint - functions are added, vulnerabilities are not patched.
Et cetera.
You really are *BIASED* and just LOVE to pick fights! The admins allow it, nothing technically "against forum rules".
Carry On, Wayward Son. Moving on... "Toodles"...
1 -
47 minutes ago, D.Draker said:
one million of vulnerabilities
Please put this back in the hole that you pulled it out of. Thanks.
0 -
*Biased* hypocritical exaggerations like that is why I will *never* "follow you*.
Unless you yourself run Win11 (maybe even Win10), then STOP RAM-RODDING THE BS ABOUT SOMETHING A YEAR OLD !!! !!! !!!
1 -
32 minutes ago, D.Draker said:
follow me
Not going to happen. Sorry, just isn't! Call it a "personality clash".
0 -
I see that Sampei.Nihira has unfortunately been "ran off the board" by folks probably jabbing his ribs too frequently.
Can't say as I blame him, to be honest, sticking around here does at times feel like a "bad decision".
At work, we have been "forced" to upgrade to Win11 (kind of surprised it took this long).
I use Official Chrome v122 here at work. It always scored Speedometer 2.1 at a 310 to 325 range in Win10.
In Win11, the same exact Chrome v122 profile scores 398 to 402. Nothing changed except Win10 upgraded to Win11. Still a far cry from Mac's that I've seen hit 530+.
1 -
22 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said:
could you ask the developer to implement them?
PATIENCE.
He releases his ungoogled only once a month or two, a faster pace than that is ridiculous.
Just because Official Chrome is updated every 2 to 4 *weeks* or so, *NONE OF US* should expect forks to be released *BY ONE PERSON* on such a *RAPID-FIRE* pace.
It really "will not kill you" to run v133 for a month or two and *WAIT* for the *one-person project* to release an ungoogled v137 or v138. Maybe a v136 will be released, maybe it won't.
If an end-user must-must-must have "cutting edge latest-and-greatest", then that user can not rely on FORKS - seems more than fair to me!
0 -
On 3/20/2025 at 4:16 PM, NotHereToPlayGames said:
These are his *ONLY TWO* ungoogled versions. You can NOT use those flags and migrate a profile from one computer to another in anything *OTHER THAN* these *TWO*.
0 -
6 hours ago, D.Draker said:
Dell 2407
This gets OLD OLD OLD OLD OLD OLD OLD OLD. I have no idea what a Dell 2407 is and what the "F-ing" obsession is with "you and your followers" always using this "phrase".
At any rate, I DO NOT CARE, I am not a "gamer" and do not need brand new computers ever six months just to watch blood splattering in 4K super-hi-def !!! !!! !!!
I do not need a new mobile phone every six months. I do not need a new LED/Plasma/OLED/Whatever monitor every six months. I do not need a new house every six months. etc etc etc
Supermium is still being targeted for folks like me, for hardware that isn't brand new every six months, or even every 10 years.
Until Supermium developer sends out a "F U all of you XP/Vista/7/10 users, we no longer support anything below Win11 and we no longer support anything older than SIX MONTHS", then, well, "curse you" and your "crew" that wants to belittle my 12yr old computer.
"Curse You" "Curse You" "Curse You"... GETTING OLD! ENOUGH WITH THE D#MN RIB-JABS!!! GOT IT?
2 -
Here is one of my newer but it is still not my newest. I still only run D3D9 intentionally and on purpose, but sure, if you have some "test" for me to run, I *might* oblige.
0 -
17 minutes ago, Karla Sleutel said:
Do you work at NASA, FBI, NSA, CIA?
No, but I would be fired if I visited MSFN from a lab bench pc/laptop and they run on a company VPN when I bring a laptop home for work activities.
Sorry, I will not put my job on the line by screencapping company hardware.
The company lets us keep them after 8yrs. Most of my computers here at home are old work machines.
The one I screencap'd is sitting here in the living room, it is my *OLDEST* but it's just *EASIEST* to screencap from it when sitting here watching news.
But no, I do not buy brand new laptops every six months, whether you want me to or not.
0 -
We run some EXTREMELY FAST and VERY EXPENSIVE hardware at work.
I drop down to D3D9 INTENTIONALLY, ON PURPOSE, and I really should not have to detail my bullet points for doing so.
0 -
This is also from my ** ** ** OLDEST HARDWARE ** ** **
0 -
THA T IS NOT MY LAPTOP !!! !!! !!!
THAT IS MY OLDEST HARDWARE !!! !!! !!!
0 -
Not sure why you think I need to "prove" this to you, but see below.
I change hardware a LOT. This is my *OLDEST* computer. Why in the H#LL do "you guys" think I am "poverty" running ancient crap?
My laptop costs more than my daughter's car. And no, I'm not going to "prove" that to you and "your obsession". Moving on... "Toodles"...
0 -
24 minutes ago, Karla Sleutel said:
resulting in the enormous cache
This enormous cache with DX11 is on a top-of-the-line laptop only 2.5yrs old.
I DO NOT WANT DX11 AND THE CACHE THAT COMES WITH USING IT!
MY needs should NOT be such an OBSESSION on YOUR end!
0 -
Several of my computers are capable of DX11. I DISABLE INTENTIONALLY. Why? Because the shader cache grows and grows and grows and I only use PORTABLE browsers, migrating from computer to computer to computer, and have no interest in GIGANTIC shader caches.
0 -
That's the wrong file. That's also not a "portable" version of 360Chrome.
The loader that we are referring to only exists in the "portable" versions of 360Chrome.
1 -
On 3/20/2025 at 7:02 AM, D.Draker said:
--disable-machine-id
--disable-encryption
Don't work. Sadly. @ED_Sln, could you ask the developer to implement them? Thanks.
3 minutes ago, ED_Sln said:How can I check if they work? I wrote these parameters in the shortcut, launched, but the browser does not write messages that some parameters are not supported, in chrome:// it also says that the browser is launched with these parameters. I checked in chrome 136 regular and for Vista, but in 7 SP1.
For those two parameters, the test is to copy your browser profile to a USB Memory Stick or a shared network folder and then copy that profile to another computer then launch the browser in that other computer.
If your extensions are still there, then these two parameters did their job.
If the other computer starts with an empty profile, then these parameters did not do their job.
If you are not migrating a profile from one computer to another, then you do not need these two parameters to begin with, these flags are for portability and migrating between computers.
1
Firefox and Chromium running on Windows 7 by e3kskoy7wqk.
in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Posted · Edited by NotHereToPlayGames
The Chrome Web Store grayed-out button is not a product of Manifest V2. All UNGOOGLED forks intentionally result in a grayed-out button. INTENTIONALLY.
You will need to install a "get crx" (or similar) from a non-chrome-web-store source then you use that to download the .crx from Chrome Web Store, save to a local folder, then install manually.
The "good" ungoogled-forks will have this flag -- chrome://flags/#extension-mime-request-handling which allows you to drag the .crx onto chrome://extensions/
A "not-so-good" ungoogled fork will require you extract then install in Developer Mode. "Good" ungoogled-forks never require Developer Mode.
Get CRX == https://www.crx4chrome.com/crx/45042/
CRX Extractor/Downloader (note: I intentionally use v1.5.7, it WORKS, the newer versions are hit-or-miss, mileage may vary) == https://www.crx4chrome.com/crx/364289/