Jump to content

ViVa

Member
  • Posts

    40
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    Netherlands

Everything posted by ViVa

  1. @OverFlow, Personally I don't have any issues while integrating KB920103 (InfoPath)...? Yes, I'm aware of the hard coded stuff, it's only a test version. Currently I'm working together with Siginet to make a dynamical AutoIt application. Of course it will be up-to-date, as it is up-to-date right now with december 2006 updates from MS. @TomCat76, I'm sorry, not trying to steal a thread or anything...
  2. Hello, I made a slipstream script, including all the updates, and it works perfectly, updates don't appear on MU / OU. Read more about it here: http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3579
  3. @RogueSpear, quite right! It's just that I couldn't resist to give a reply to what hajj_3 said.
  4. Since when is a RC considered to be bugfree? It's a release candidate, it MIGHT be bugfree, but there are no guarantees.
  5. Try what? Ryan's pack? I am using it since like version 1.20 or so...
  6. I didn't know about your pack adding languages?
  7. I know Jeremy, I was referring to jmbattle: I mean, what should be displayed on the 'remove components' page on behalve of Ryan's pack?
  8. With all due respect, but what does Ryan's pack add? It just updates things?
  9. Erm, shouldn't nLite integrate Ryan's update pack before removing components?
  10. When can we expect a RC4 release?
  11. @Dels, it has got nothing todo with wether I like it or not what you worked on, but no worries, won't post again here, was just wondering around.
  12. I disagree, XP Lite can be as fast as 2000, and even more stable.
  13. ViVa

    ...

    XPize changes the checksum of the specified files. WU checks if the checksum of updated files are 'correct'. So if you installed XPize, WU notices so, and therefore thinks that specific file is incorrect and therefore complains, this is a false positive. **** my English is crappy, time for some sleep.
  14. @mrnxdmx, np. @XPero, see what I mean with qfecheck? According to Ryan nothing _should_ be wrong. I suppose there isn't any way to avoid this, since the checksum is now checked of the corresponding files.
  15. XPero, let me get this straight... Are you talking about Ryan's 2.0.5 pack? And did you check qfecheck? I think you misunderstood. Because I'm not saying that things aren't working, I'm saying qfecheck is complaining.
  16. Btw, apparently something changed @ MS, when I do a reinstall now and patch my files with XPize 4.3, I get like 20 broken hotfixes according to qfecheck. Appears that the checksum is checked now too. It might be harmless as long as you know sure the hotfixes were installed correctly before patching them. Just to let you guys know. (Thanks RyanVM for clearing things up as well.)
  17. XPero is already aware of this, thank you.
  18. Lol, XPize has its own integrate function built-in... That's what you should use, not nLite.
  19. XPero, this is still on the main page:
  20. But the .zip download does work, what's wrong with that?
×
×
  • Create New...