Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by jaclaz
-
The three are interrelated. To take an example that we'll all (hopefully) be familiar with, in George Orwell's 1984 the protagonist, Winston Smith, lacked both freedom and security because there was no privacy -- all he did and said was monitored, or reported. Now, I'm not saying that Microsoft is (yet) monitoring everything we type and everywhere we go on our computers -- but I am asking what the meaning (if any) might be of what that guy on MDL had discovered. --JorgeA Yes , that is called Science Fiction, it didn't (yet) happen, as well as Minority Report and the pre-crime do not yet exist, nor Blade Runner, and Skynet didn't - seemingly - gain self-awareness on August 29, 1997. (but if - by any chance - your real name is John Connor, you'd better start to run ). jaclaz
-
Good. (in the sense of bad ) The setup doesn't even "start". This means that the issue is in the very early stage of "text mode", and this means (roughly) that either; the CD is corrupt (so-called "bad-burn") (it happens more often than not) there is a hardware faiure of some kind (less likely, but possible) It cannot be a needed driver missing (as at this stage this should not matter as they are not yet involved, you should get a more senceful error meassage, though still not having the proper drivers integrated might be the reason ). Next step would be to test the CD in a Virtual Machine. Which OS are you running on the PC you are using to browse and post the Forum? I presume a Windows NT based system of some kind. If yes, easiest would be to use Qemu Manager: http://www.davereyn.co.uk/download.htm It is quite straightforward, you install it, then follow the wizard when creating a new Virtual machine, select XP as OS, and create a new 2 Gb disk (RAW format). Of course you will need some space on the hard disk of the "real" machine, something more than the 2 Gb. In settings, go to the "Drives" Tab, make sure that the image you just created is set as "Hard disk 0", select "CDROM" and point it to the drive letter corresponding to the CD drive in the "real"machine (where you have inserted the XP CD Rom media to test) and make sure that "Boot order" is set so that "CD/DVD drive" is before "Hard drive". If the CD is OK, you should be able to replicate the video. There would be still the possibility that this "other machine" CD/DVD drive can read the XP CD by that the drive on your laptop doesn't, if this is the case normally the CD drive (of the laptop) would do "strange" noises, trying to read the CD over and over. Checking (and if the case cleaning) the reading lens of the CD drive wouldn't make any harm. Then, next test would be to download the UBCD: http://www.ultimatebootcd.com/ burn it to a CD (IMGBURN) and try booting the laptop with it. This CD has - among many other tools - a set of diagnostic tools that will help to diagnose hardware issues (if any). jaclaz
-
Ok, now I am really confused. Let's do it like this , have a look at this video: The actual Setup starts at 1:55. WHEN exactly (with reference to that video) do you encounter the: jaclaz
-
Yes, as I told you this is likely to happen if the CD you have is not (choose one): the specific "Dell" one for your laptop a "normal" XP CD BUT with integrated to it the necessary specific drivers (if you prefer a "normal" CD modified to be "wider" in the supported hardware It is also possible that you are suffering from a hardware problem, but until you don't find a way to try a "properly made" XP install CD there is no way to check this, if not testing the laptop with an alternate OS (like a Linux "live" CD or a PE of some kind). But then you are in a Catch 22 situation, if you (in your own words) are "not tech savvy at all" you will have difficulties in creating the (hopefully) good install CD by following the given instructions/advice and/or testing the laptp with an alternate liveOS to exclude the hardware issue, or you can decide to become tech savvy , what is needed is not over the head of any willing computer user, and we can try and help/guide you through the needed steps. It's only up to you, but - and with all due respect - until you wear the hat of the "not tech savvy at all" you cannot "suspect" *anything*. You were pointed to a possible procedure, if you have questions about it or issues in replicating it, I guess everyone will try and support you, but before the new "suspect" (IMHO perfectly innocent) you should try the recommended procedure, and not abandon it and find other suspects because you cannot replicate properly what was suggested. If I get it right what you experience is the following: You insert the boot CD your son-in-law sent you and can boot from it. You see a number of screens in white text over blue background (this is what is called "text mode" part of the setup) You are (possibly) asked to partition/format the hard disk A number of files are copied from the CD to the hard disk (you see theis files enumerated in the bottom of the blue screen) The text mode part ends and you are asked to take the CD out of the drive and reboot. Is the above accurate? If NO, describe what you are currently experiencing. Then WHAT happens? (please describe what happens) jaclaz
-
Well, let's try not to confuse Freedom (which is one thing) with Privacy amd Security (which are other things). Besides that, when you go and buy a car you don't pretend to have the source code of the built-in navigator, nor of the car diagnostic system if you are worried about these things phoning home or providing informations to the manufacturer, you go and buy a bycicle INSTEAD. (if you prefer you have no or little choices). With OS, you have the choices, so bragging about these issues is mostly nonsense, just get a Linux, or better, BSD , and avoid whining. It is important to know what happens in detail, and have viable alternatives, should one not like these features. These "bad" behaviours can be changed by simply not buying that OS and saying aloud WHY exactly you didn't, but it's not like they would be censoring your speech, limiting your mobility or similar. jaclaz
-
NO. Meaning that your suspect is wrong . If that computer came (say) with DOS 6.22 and noone ever attempted to install to it a Windows XP, that could have been the case , but since that Laptop already was running XP, there are NO incompatibilities in the BIOS you have (unless you later aupdated the BIOS to a newer version from the one that the laptop was shipped with) with the Windows XP setup. (*somehow* that XP was installed to it using that BIOS) By updating the BIOS (which is not in itself a good or a bad thing ) you simply introduce a possible ADDITIONAL issue. Could you answer my questions? Maybe (just maybe) if I understand waht is happening, I can help you. jaclaz
-
I don't get it. What you want is a "touch" like tool? http://www.softtreetech.com/24x7/archive/47.htm http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/nircmd.html http://www.stevemiller.net/apps/ http://www.stevemiller.net/downloads/ctb10w32.zip Frm the latter (working on WIn95 up to 7 ): jaclaz
-
Do you think that Windows 7 Activation is profoundly different form that? jaclaz
-
Reference for WinNT.SIF (unattend) values?
jaclaz replied to JohnKaufmann's topic in Unattended Windows 2000/XP/2003
You can call me "coward" as you like , but what I ALWAYS do and suggest (in the "better be safe" than sorry approach ) is (JFYI): NEVER use a path with spaces NEVER use (unless really, really and I mean really) needed any filename that is not conforming toi the good ol' DOS 8+3 convention NEVER use either the "desktop" or an user profile (talking about drivers/programs, etc. connected with setup) This may well be overcautious and unneeded in a number of situations, but doing ANY of the above listed NO-NOes is introducing an additional (and unneeded) possibility to let Murphy's Law prove itself right (once again ). About the ref.chm you will need to learn to live with the fact that the MS originated info is: rarely (please read as "never") complete/exhaustive often (please read as "almost always") deceiving, badly worded or prone to be understood wrongly or only partially sometimes (not often but "it happens") plainly wrong The good news are that if it was not as above described, we would have a lot less fun in finding the omissions, the untold, the (intentionally or not) deceiving..... ... and doing crazy experiments to find what really happens under the hood.... jaclaz PS: Another couple possibly interesting resources: http://unattended.sourceforge.net/index.php http://itk.samfundet.no/dok-filer/ms-xp-sp2-deployment-ref/ -
Oh, yes you DO. Or, sooner that you might expect, the IGC (International Geek Committee) will send someone to get back your diploma and badge (besides ALL your screwdrivers, and YES including the pentalobe one ): http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/01/24/apple_screws/ http://www.ifixit.com/blog/2011/01/20/apples-diabolical-plan-to-screw-your-iphone/ jaclaz
-
The UK are not that much different: http://www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk/About-Us/Our-business/Safety http://www.pontypool-and-blaenavon.co.uk/pages/pageitem.aspx?page=visitorinfo Clause 9 here (NSW): http://www.131500.com.au/tickets/upload/docs/Passenger_Fares_Handbook.pdf In TV: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0752252/quotes?qt=qt1208712 SCOOP! there is humour in Maryland : http://mta.maryland.gov/your-guide-mta-bus-safety jaclaz
-
OT , but not much : jaclaz
-
Why don't you simply remove it? http://www.mvps.org/ecvogel/kb/XP_remove_progs.htm jaclaz
-
How to get back my data from a RAW USB flash drive?
jaclaz replied to ask4y's topic in Hard Drive and Removable Media
First thing you need to make a RAW copy of the stick (if possible). Typically there are two possible "family" of issues: partition/filesystem level issues (even a single byte with the wrong value may turn a working stick in a "RAW" one) actual hardware/controller/memory issues (these cannot be solved easily with "common" software, in some cases they may using "special" tools) The first are normally fixable. Which OS are you using? I will assume a NT based system, then use datarescuedd to make a RAW (or dd-like) image of those sticks, see: http://www.datarescue.com/photorescue/v3/drdd.htm What often happens (no way to know if this is what happened to you, but the fact that it happened to TWO sticks - I presume coming from the same source might be a symptom that you got a couple "fakes"). There are ways to set the stick in such a way that an OS will see a larger size than what is really in the flash of the stick. The unsuspecting user uses the stick "normally" until, a certain day, the amount of the "real" flash in the stick is reached and data simply "wrap arounds", overwriting the beginning of the flash. JFYI, (for the future) whenever you buy a USB flash stick you must check it with one of the available testing programs to make sure that the "label capacity" is actually there. For the moment just choose one of the two sticks and make the image with datarescuedd (once you have done it post the EXACT size in bytes). Then post the results of the tests on the actual stick as in here: jaclaz -
Reference for WinNT.SIF (unattend) values?
jaclaz replied to JohnKaufmann's topic in Unattended Windows 2000/XP/2003
Maybe relevant info is nearer than you might think: http://gosh.msfn.org/ sure the info is "here and there" and you will need to dig a bit in the past. Possibly useful (though not what you asked for) txtsetup.sif related: http://www.msfn.org/board/topic/14852-switches-in-txtsetupsif/ Some (interesting?) related findings are "here and there" in the "Install windows form USB" section: http://www.msfn.org/board/forum/157-install-windows-from-usb/ jaclaz -
And wait until you will have a touchscreen Anyway, from time to time you really should clean those monitors from the inside too. http://www.linein.org/blog/2008/01/11/free-screen-cleaner/ http://www.linein.org/blog/2008/03/20/free-screen-cleaner-cat-version/ Another version more interactive (that requires a Spoiler and changes to xxx) : jaclaz
-
Sure , I know, but that was three years ago (and on another place/another topic): http://www.911cd.net/forums//index.php?showtopic=23239 Since you referenced this other place, it is worth to mention recent developments there : http://www.911cd.net/forums//index.php?showtopic=23183&st=37 jaclaz
-
Unless I am mistaken, subinacl.exe is anyway a "third-party tool in the sense that it is in the Resource Kit. Just for the record: http://sourceforge.net/projects/aclutil/?source=directory http://sourceforge.net/projects/aclutil/files/ http://www.windowsnetworking.com/kbase/WindowsTips/WindowsNT/RegistryTips/CommandShell/UseaScripttoChangeRegistryPermissionsfromtheCommandLine.html http://helgeklein.com/setacl/examples/ http://web.archive.org/web/20090608231837/http://homepages.cae.wisc.edu/~micro/regperm/ http://www.softpedia.com/get/Tweak/Registry-Tweak/RegSecEdit.shtml Maybe some of these can run "earlier" Also, maybe useful, maybe not : jaclaz
-
Elevators are dangerous....: For the record (and just to show how common sense is not actually common) in the building I work there is an elevator with a sign (conforming to the local law) stating how the load limit is : The actual load limiter (if load is exceeded the elevator will stop and often this will happen after it started i.e. between floors) is set at 10% more, i.e. 350 Kg., i.e. the maximum tollerance allowed by regulations. After "recovering" (several times) people from the "jammed" elevator (tendentially 4 people each around 90 or 100 Kg + each having a suitcase, no-less than 15 Kg's), I changed the sticker to: No later than three weeks ago I got out of that thingy 3 (for the record Australian ) BIG guys, more than 1,90 m tall, roughly 120/130 Kg each, each one with a suitcase, no less than 20 Kg, AND a small rucksack.... I fear that if I change again the sticker to say : it will go on half the internet as an example of italians always exaggerating.... jaclaz
-
Yeah, life is tough.... ... but whining does not help in the least, as a matter of fact, makes life even worse.... JFYI, a number of laptops have the Fn key and often it is used in combination with numerical keys. It is possible that the actual hardware is actually interfering with your assigned hot-keys. If I were you , I would try the same hot-keys on an external keyboard connected to the laptop and see if the behaviour is the same (and I would also take it easier ) jaclaz
-
I guess that this will largely depend on how many morons users will subscribe to the new Office licensing scheme . This still reminds me of elementary school: |7| + |1|= | | |8| |6| + |2|= | | jaclaz P.S.: For NO apparent reason a possible explanation of the creative process (re: "new" Windows Logo):
-
BUT, I don't think that the BIOS SLIC (or any other source if not the COA or the Manufacturer specs for the model) can "select" the "original" version of the OS. For XP: For the record, while it is true that most of the "big name" OEM do not provide "original" media, they do provide means (the prompt that the customer normally ignores ) to create at least "Recovery" DVD's and make a Recovery partition. Unless the hard disk has been damaged and replaced, (and if the Recovery media has not been created or has been lost) the "preferred" source should be the Recovery partition. At least with XP using a "generic" OS source will turn out anyway in a "nightmare" with drivers and what not. jaclaz
-
HDD performance <-> Allocation unit size
jaclaz replied to DiracDeBroglie's topic in Hard Drive and Removable Media
And now Antonio Cairoli has 6 Championships, becoming the all-time 2nd together with Joël Robert and after Stefan Everts. http://www.motocross.com/features/two-more-titles-for-ktm-world-mx/ jaclaz -
...and much more than those, this aging page of mine still contains valid points (FAQ #10): http://jaclaz.altervista.org/Projects/USB/USBfaqs.html For the record just recently I found an (old) EPIA 5000 motherboard that for *whatever* reasons does need USB ZIP geometry AND NOT *any* grub (grub legacy/grub4dos/grub2) (but boots with the standard 2K/XP MBR+bootsector and with the Syslinux bootsector. Though I haven't done all the possible tests, I made quite a few (and then let it aside since I managed to solve the actual issue and needed to put back the machine to work). But usually the issue (if USB/BIOS related) is in the very first phases of boot, what you reported does sound a lot like the motherboard needing a good clean (particularly the RAM sockets and the RAM be reseated). jaclaz