My2GirlsDad
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by My2GirlsDad
-
-
Could I see these modifications?
Hello. I made some small modifications to the script:
Add:
S|HF\Windows2000-WindowsMedia-KB978695-x86-!lang!.exe|MS10-033: Windows Media Format Runtime 9
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Extracted binaries for DirectX 9 (gaming)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
O|HFCABS\Jun2010_D3DCompiler_43_x86.cab|extracted DX9-file
O|HFCABS\Jun2010_d3dcsx_43_x86.cab|extracted DX9-file
O|HFCABS\Jun2010_d3dx10_43_x86.cab|extracted DX9-file
O|HFCABS\Jun2010_d3dx11_43_x86.cab|extracted DX9-file
O|HFCABS\Jun2010_d3dx9_43_x86.cab|extracted DX9-file
O|HFCABS\Jun2010_XACT_x86.cab|extracted DX9-file
O|HFCABS\Jun2010_XAudio_x86.cab|extracted DX9-file
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Extracted unsued updates for DirectX 9
--------------------------------------------------------------------
O|HFCABS\Jun2010_D3DCompiler_43_x64.cab|extracted 64Bit-DX9-file, dont't use x64-CABs here
O|HFCABS\Jun2010_d3dcsx_43_x64.cab|extracted 64Bit-DX9-file, dont't use x64-CABs here
O|HFCABS\Jun2010_d3dx10_43_x64.cab|extracted 64Bit-DX9-file, dont't use x64-CABs here
O|HFCABS\Jun2010_d3dx11_43_x64.cab|extracted 64Bit-DX9-file, dont't use x64-CABs here
O|HFCABS\Jun2010_d3dx9_43_x64.cab|extracted 64Bit-DX9-file, dont't use x64-CABs here
O|HFCABS\Jun2010_XACT_x64.cab|extracted 64Bit-DX9-file, dont't use x64-CABs here
O|HFCABS\Jun2010_XAudio_x64.cab|extracted 64Bit-DX9-file, dont't use x64-CABs here
O|HF\directx_Jun2010_redist.exe|DirectX 9.0c End-User Runtimes Jun 2010 (9.29.1962)|-|HFCABS\Jun2010_XAudio_x86.cab|alrady extracted in HFCABS
Changed:
R|HF\directx_feb2010_redist.exe|DirectX 9.0c End-User Runtimes Feb 2010 (9.28.1886)|-|HFCABS\Feb2010_XAudio_x86.cab|Already extracted in HFCABS
REM For checking Flash Player
REM --------------------------------------------------------------------
SET fpVersion=10.1.53.64
SET fpFile=Flash10h.ocx
SET fpSize=5712336
REM --------------------------------------------------------------------
REM For checking Roots Certificates
REM --------------------------------------------------------------------
SET rcVersion=24.0.2195.0 May 2010
SET rcSize=336280
Removed:
S|HF\Windows2000-WindowsMedia-KB979902-x86-!lang!.exe|MS10-033: Windows Media Format Runtime 9
The 24.0.2195.0 May 2010 Roots Cerificates is not for Windows2000. After installing it MU/WU asks for the version in the extension. So that shouldn't be changed. Everything else looks good.
Parseus, will you be making these changes to your extension? Just wondering?
Regards,
M2GD
0 -
...
But wmfdist95.exe is the reason why KB941569 is needed (I think).
I will make a test...
If my thought is correct, I add a dependency in the file-checker that KB941569 is expected if wmfdist95.exe was found.
...
So, I've tested the following:
using the setting from Trustee with the following changes:
- no WU/MU (I think it doesn't makes the difference)
- DON'T using wmfdist95.exe
The result: Windows-Update doesn't expecting KB941569!
So KB941569 is only needed when using WMP9+wmfdist95.exe!!!
New file-checker extension for XP:
2010-07-20
- Fixed: Reactivated KB941569 and added a dependency: This update is needed
when using the combination WMP9 + wmfdist95.exe (KB891122)
- Fixed: Update-check for Malicious Software Removal Tool v3.9Thx @ all for reporting these bugs!!!
Mimo,
With your new extension I'm getting KB941569 missing. I have wmp11 in the ini file. You said it only necessary for wmp9.
Can you correct this or should I put it in IGNORE?
Thanks for you time.
M2GD
0 -
new file-checker extension for xp:
2010-07-15
- Added: KB2229593 (MS10-042: Help and Support Center)
- Added: Malicious Software Removal Tool v3.9
- Removed: Malicious Software Removal Tool v3.8Mimo,
I found a typo with your new XP extension.
R|HF\windows-kb890830-v3.7.exe|Malicious Software Removal Tool v3.8, replaced by v3.9
H|HF\windows-kb890830-v3.8.exe|Malicious Software Removal Tool v3.9
Oops!!
M2GD
0 -
Erlisperlis,
From your procesdata file I can see some updates are not being processed...
There is at least one thing I can help you with:
NDP30SP2-KB982524-x86.exe <---- Did you download it and put this directly in your workfolder?
You should first make the silent installer as Krose instructed in his PDF Tut.
It includes decompressing the .MSP files and re-compress them as individual silent installers.
Your procesdata does not show these individual updates, neither your work folder contains them.
I have just made the .Net all-in-one with the tips from Krose and everything got processed.
It all comes down to reading a bit, once you got it it's fairly easy.
Strel if you are out there, thanks for this wonderful tool!
Cheers
Escorpiom.
Erlisperlis,
Escorpiom is correct. I would add that you do not need NetFx20SP2_x86.exe and
NetFx20SP2_x86no.exe when you have dotnetfx35.exe and dotnetfx35langpack_x86no.exe.
It's one or the other but not both.
M2GD
0 -
I used the same IExpress method for KB982354 that I used for the prior updates as discussed previously. KB976576 and KB977354 were processed, no errors, and WU was happy once again. I have attached a pdf tutorial of the IExpress process I used to make the installers. I hope this helps everyone.
krose,
Thanks for your tutorial. It corrects my earlier post. I like your way better.
M2GD
0 -
Thanks for tip on how to install KB982168. I never knew there was a program called IExpress. Once I figured out the install command and named the file correctly, everything worked flawlessly.
Would you mind explaining what install command you used for those of us still in the dark? Thanks!
msiexec /p NDPXXSP2-KBXXXXXX.msp
XX- NET version
XXXXXX- KB number of msp file
Hopes this helps.
0 -
Krose,
Thanks for tip on how to install KB982168. I never knew there was a program called IExpress. Once I figured out the install command and named the file correctly, everything worked flawlessly.
Edit: I just realized, by looking at the screenshot I posted, that the names of my files did not contain the "-x86" section, so it's possible the installer did not recognize them. I'll try that as well.
Sp0iLedBrAt,
Yep! You do have to include the "-x86" in your file name. The first time I tried I didn't include it and it was passed over. When I correctly included it everything installed fine.
M2GD
0 -
Will the redist-package run on W2K? If yes, continue with:I have a small problem with these - DirectX 9.0c from June 2010 doesn't have CAB-s for Windows 2000 (dxnt.cab & bdant.cab) and in description of redistributable Windows 2000 is not shown as a supported system. On the contrary, Web installer for that DX supports Windows 2000
The question is - should I include these binaries into my extension?Use the redist-package and install it manually - check it with dxdiag
Slipstream it and after installation of windows - check it again with dxdiag
Probably you can save two reports and compare them.
If dxnt.cab & bdant.cab are needed, makes it sense to make a description to add them from the Feb2010-redist-package?
In the redist-package from Feb2010 Windows 2000 is also not listet. Just in the web-installer of Feb2010.
Mim0 and Parseus,
I have created my latest Win2k CD and DirectX 9.0c from June 2010 slipstreamed fine. It should be safe to update the 2k FC along with MimO's sugguestion about dxnt.cab & bdant.cab files.
Secondly, Flash needs to be changed to version 10.1.53.64, file name is Flash10h.ocx, and size is 5712336.
Thirdly, I have a problem when I have update-check enabled. The extension update works great. The problem is file-checker says wrong version everytime and proceeds to download the "new" version. This happens even when I'm using the latest version. Additionally, when I try to exit the program, it loads the XP version and tries to use the XP-extension which is not available. This only happens with 2K-FC as XP-FC works correctly.
Thanks for all your help.
M2GD
0 -
have made a new AiO build with these updates added:
* NDP1.1sp1-KB979906-X86
* NDP20SP2-KB979909-x86
* NDP20SP2-KB982167-x86
* NDP30SP2-KB982168-x86
One warning at compilation for KB982168 but seems to works fine.
Me Too
here is the same. only KB982168 prompt from Windows Update site. hope this would be fix..
I had the same results with XP. With Windows 2000 everything installed correctly. My only issue is with KB982168. I get the same error twice when creating the build. I've attached a screenshot of the error.
Strel- Where are you? We need your help!
M2GD
0 -
New version released. You can also finally enable auto-update
Parseus,
Thanks for the new version.
I did find two errors.
unknown: HF\Windows2000-WindowsMedia-KB978695-x86-ENU.exe
missing (S): HF\Windows2000-WindowsMedia-KB979902-x86-ENU.exe (MS10-033: Windows Media Format Runtime 9)
I believe these are the same thing. The update is KB978695 and the article is KB979902. Your change log is correct. Typo? It replaces Windows2000-WindowsMedia-KB968816-x86-ENU.
Also, concerning directx_Jun2010_redist in HFCAB, I'm getting following "errors":
unknown: HFCABS\Jun2010_D3DCompiler_43_x64.cab
unknown: HFCABS\Jun2010_D3DCompiler_43_x86.cab
unknown: HFCABS\Jun2010_d3dcsx_43_x64.cab
unknown: HFCABS\Jun2010_d3dcsx_43_x86.cab
unknown: HFCABS\Jun2010_d3dx10_43_x64.cab
unknown: HFCABS\Jun2010_d3dx10_43_x86.cab
unknown: HFCABS\Jun2010_d3dx11_43_x64.cab
unknown: HFCABS\Jun2010_d3dx11_43_x86.cab
unknown: HFCABS\Jun2010_d3dx9_43_x64.cab
unknown: HFCABS\Jun2010_d3dx9_43_x86.cab
unknown: HFCABS\Jun2010_XACT_x64.cab
unknown: HFCABS\Jun2010_XACT_x86.cab
unknown: HFCABS\Jun2010_XAudio_x64.cab
unknown: HFCABS\Jun2010_XAudio_x86.cab
Thanks for your hard work. I hope this helps.
M2GD
0 -
file-checker-extension for XP:
2010-05-26- Added: Roots certificates check updated to May 2010 (24.0.2195.0)
Thanks MimO! Works great now. I didn't mean to rush you on your update.
Continued Thanks for all your hard work.
I appreciate it.
M2GD
0 -
While I'm sad to hear of tommyp's decision to stop support for this great program, I can fully understand his frustration. It's disheartening that people would take something that is meant for personal use and go against the author/creator's wishes. After all, this is tommyp's baby and if he doesn't want it used on commercial installations that is his right. I just wish people could have respected his wishes. Now, because of this we all lose.
tommyp, I want to thank you for all the hard work you put in to this project. Thank you for all the help you offered in making my slipstreamed installations working flawlessly. I will always be grateful for your courteous answers to my questions and helping solve my problems. My best to you in your future endeavors.
M2GD
0 -
Mimo,
New Roots Certificate Update for XP May 2010.
version: 24.0.2195.0
size: 336,280
Please update your file-checker.
M2GD
0 -
Parseus,
With your new version, the DirectX 9(gaming)already extracted in HFCABS under Operating-System Specific Settings is reporting "no" even though I have extracted it. It had worked correctly in the previous version. Typo maybe?
M2GD
Maybe not exactly a typo, but something similar. Anyway, new version released.
Hello Parseus,
Thanks for the quick fix, works great now.
M2GD
0 -
New version released (thanks Mim0).
Parseus,
With your new version, the DirectX 9(gaming)already extracted in HFCABS under Operating-System Specific Settings is reporting "no" even though I have extracted it. It had worked correctly in the previous version. Typo maybe?
M2GD
0 -
file-checker:
2010-05-17
- Fixed: Detection of W2K (when no SP included)file-checker extension for XP
2010-05-17
- Fixed: The information at the beginning regarding extracted DX9 was
not correct, It showed that DX9 was not extracted (in HFCABS)
even when it was ectracted. But it was only this. The reporting
missing/obsolete files were correct.Links to template and W2K-extension also corrected. Thx to Parseus
Mimo and Parseus,
Thank you for the corrections to your file-checker. I can now run it for both 2K and XP without incident.
I appreciate all your efforts to make this a great little, but powerful, program.
My2GirlsDad
0 -
Greeting Parseus,
I have run the latest version of your script and found the following issues:
I have SP0 in source and received the following “error”:
-----------------------------------------------------------
Running HFSLIPFC v.2010/05/14 at Thu 05/14/2010 21:11:05.71
-----------------------------------------------------------
wrong (S): HF\W2KSP4_EN.exe (Service Pack 4 for Windows 2000, it's for SP4)
I want to update VBScript to v5.7. I put KB981349 in HF and received the following “errors”:
-----------------------------------------------------------
Running HFSLIPFC v.2010/05/14 at Thu 05/14/2010 21:11:05.71
-----------------------------------------------------------
obsolete: HF\Windows2000-KB981349-x86-ENU.EXE (MS10-022: VBScript update from 5.1 to 5.7, VBScript update applicable for Windows Script 5.7)
missing (S): HF\Windows2000-KB981349-x86-ENU.EXE (MS10-022: VBScript update from 5.1 to 5.7)
missing (S): HF\Windows2000-KB981350-x86-ENU.EXE (MS10-022: VBScript (update from 5.1 to 5.6 version))
You have marked the following for server but it is for both. It should not be marked as Server only. It is needed to keep MU from asking for KB926122.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Running HFSLIPFC v.2010/05/14 at Thu 05/14/2010 21:11:05.71
-----------------------------------------------------------
wrong (S): HF\Windows2000-KB973037-x86-ENU.EXE (MS09-066: Active Directory, it's for SERVER)
The following updates are for WMP6. Even though I am slipstreaming WMP9, WMP6 is not replaced. I have not found a way to successfully stop WMP6 from installing using HFSLIP. It breaks the install. Since this is the case, these updates would be needed whether you slipstream WMP9 or not. As stephan_bauer reported MU and WU says there are needed.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Running HFSLIPFC v.2010/05/14 at Thu 05/14/2010 21:11:05.71
-----------------------------------------------------------
wrong (S): HF\WindowsMedia6-KB925398-v2-x86-ENU.exe (MS06-078: Windows Media Formats, it's for WMP6)
wrong (S): HF\WindowsMedia64-KB954600-x86-ENU.exe (MS08-076: Windows Media Components, it's for WMP6)
wrong (S): HF\WindowsMedia64-KB974112-x86-ENU.exe (MS09-052: ASF files, it's for WMP6)
The following update is for Server only and you have it marked as both.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Running HFSLIPFC v.2010/05/14 at Thu 05/14/2010 21:11:05.71
-----------------------------------------------------------
missing (S): HF\Windows2000-KB926121-x86-ENU.EXE (MS06-077: Remote Installation Services
The following update is an advisory that is required to keep MU happy. It is for Enhancements for the Indeo Codec.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Running HFSLIPFC v.2010/05/14 at Thu 05/14/2010 21:11:05.71
-----------------------------------------------------------
unknown: HF\windows2000-kb955759-x86-enu.exe
This is an update for both WMP6.4 and WMP9. It should be placed in HFSVCPACK as the WMP9 part installs correctly in HF but not the WMP6.4 part. See my explanation above.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Running HFSLIPFC v.2010/05/14 at Thu 05/14/2010 21:11:05.71
-----------------------------------------------------------
missing (S): HF\Windows2000-WindowsMedia-KB977816-x86-ENU.EXE (MS10-026: MPEG Layer-3 Codecs)
I hope this information helps to make an already great tool even better. Thanks for all your hard work and expertise.
My2GirlsDad
0 -
HFSLIPFC doesn't detect extracted DX9. XP extension must be at fault, because my 2K extension correctly detects extracted DX9.
I have the same problem Parseus. Apart from the DX9 problem, everything else seems to be fine with XP extension.
My2GirlsDad
0 -
Clean install = install using the hfslip created iso. Once the iso is installed, click start/run/wmp so that it "runs". Typically when wmp is run the first time, a mess of registry stuff is added. Maybe WU is looking for that stuff.
tommyp,
I did what you said with the same result. MU still asks for the four updates for WMP6.4 even though I slipstreamed WMP9.
Should I resign myself to installing these hotfixes even though WMP6.4 is not suppose to be installed or do you have another idea?.
Thanks for your input.
M2GD
0 -
Can you check the version of wmvcore.dll? It should be in windows\system32. The version should be 9.x.x.x.
My version is 9.0.0.3362
If it's version 9.x.x.x, do a clean install of the iso, run WMP9, then visit WU. Maybe something w/wmp9 needs to initialize to keep WU happy? I'm just throwing darts to figure this one out.What do you mean by clean install of the iso? Do you mean just without WMP9? Please advise as I'm a little confused. I apologize for being dense.
Thank you for your patience and continued help.
M2GD
0 -
M2GD, I've found that WMP is a bit difficult on any OS and slipstreaming various varieties always could pose a prob, especially when it comes time for WM related hotfixes. First off, can you go through your HF folder and tell me if MPSetup.exe exists? I know it's a dumb question, but the presence of that file is supposed to trigger something. As far as the last hotfix you mention, MSFT is sloppy. Your resultant iso will not be corrupted if you include server hotfixes on a pro source. You may have a few extra files on your cd. No biggie.
tommyp,
Thanks for the quick response.
Yes, I do have MPsetup.exe in the HF folder. Can WMP9 be extracted in a separate folder like WMP11 in XP or will that cause other problems? Just wondering!
As far as the server hotfix, what's one more file?
Appreciate your help.
M2GD
0 -
tommyp,
Windows2000 PRO slipstreaming WMP9.
When I run MU it asks for the following updates:
WindowsMedia6-KB925398-v2-x86-ENU.exe
WindowsMedia64-KB954600-x86-ENU.exe
windows2000-kb955759-x86-enu.exe
WindowsMedia64-KB974112-x86-ENU.exe
All of these updates are for WMP6.4. I have slipstreamed WMP9. Why is MU asking me for these? Is there a way to remove WMP6.4 or do I need to apply these updates?
Also, I tried putting Windows2000-WindowsMedia-KB977816-x86-ENU.EXE in HF, but because of WMP6.4, MU still asks for it. Do I need to put it in HFSVPACK_SW1?
Finally, MU asks for Windows2000-KB926122-x86-ENU.EXE which the bulletin says is for PRO and SERVER. The latest version of this update is Windows2000-KB973037-x86-ENU.EXE which is listed for SERVER only. Why is MU asking me for this update if it is for SERVER? Do I need to include it?
Your Thoughts?
M2GD
0 -
Firstly, thank you for creating this program for Win2k. I've been using Mimo's XP Checker since it inception and both of these programs help greatly to keep track of our update lists.
I would like to point out a couple of problems I have found.
unknown: HF\Windows2000-KB981349-x86-ENU.EXE
missing (S): HF\Windows2000-KB981350-x86-ENU.EXE (MS10-022: VBScript (update from 5.1 to 5.6 version))
KB981349 updates VBSCRIPT from version 5.1 to 5.7. On these updates it would be either but not both. Maybe you need an entry in the INI file whether user wants version 5.6 or version 5.7. Something to think about.
missing (S): HF\Windows2000-KB917537-x86-ENU.EXE (MS06-034: Internet Information Services (IIS))
missing (S): HF\Windows2000-KB926121-x86-ENU.EXE (MS06-077: Remote Installation Services)
missing (S): HF\Windows2000-KB926247-x86-ENU.EXE (MS06-074: SNMP)
missing (S): HF\Windows2000-KB942831-x86-ENU.EXE (MS08-005: Internet Information Services (IIS))
missing (S): HF\Windows2000-KB953155-x86-ENU.EXE (MS08-062: Internet Printing Service)
missing (S): HF\Windows2000-KB957097-x86-ENU.EXE (MS08-068: SMB)
missing (S): HF\Windows2000-KB976323-x86-ENU.EXE (MS10-024: SMTP Service
missing (S): HF\Windows2000-KB977290-x86-ENU.EXE (MS10-014: Kerberos)
missing (S): HF\Windows2000-WindowsMedia-KB975025-v2-x86-ENU.exe (MS09-051: Audio Compression Manager)
missing (S): HF\WindowsMedia9-KB969878-x86-ENU.exe (MS09-051: WMA Voice Codec)
You have all the updates tagged as High-Priority, but I believe they should be marked as Optional as Windows/Microsoft Updates does not ask for any of them. Am I correct?
unknown: HFCABS\_IE6_HFSLIP.CAB
unknown: HFCABS\_IE6b_HFSLIP.CAB
unknown: HFCABS\_OE6_HFSLIP.CAB
These files are created the first time you run HFSLIP. Should they be included in your list?
Found unexpected version of Roots Certificates (HF\rootsupd.exe)
While you have the version correct, 22.0.2195.0 SEP 2009, the size you have is incorrect. The size should be 239000.
Thank again for all your efforts
M2GD
0 -
2010-01-27b
- Fixed: KB951978 is NOT obsolete when IE8 is integrated
MimO,
FYI, KB951978 does not show missing if not in HF folder.
M2GD
0
The question is - should I include these binaries into my extension?
The File-Checker (HFSLIPFC) for HFSLIP
in HFSLIP
Posted
Thanks for the correction, Mimo! Works great now.