ggtyh Posted September 11, 2003 Posted September 11, 2003 Just wondering if a hard disk drive with 8 mB of cache is a real improvement over an identical drive but that only has 2 mB of cache.
Aaron Posted September 11, 2003 Posted September 11, 2003 bench your 2mb cache hard drive speed with a copy of HD_Speed.exe on normal and burst rate mode, and post the results. I'll compare my two western digital 8mb cache drive results with yours.
R600 Posted September 11, 2003 Posted September 11, 2003 I read somewhere that the 8mb buffer is a load of s***e when it comes to reading/writing over 40mb of data.It was said that it makes a major difference when writing the first 40mb of data, then all is back to average write speed.Come to think of it, im sure you'd agree to a certain extent that this is true since the write speed on an average HD is fast anyway. The buffer acts as a temporary guard against minor transfer slow-down.
ggtyh Posted September 11, 2003 Author Posted September 11, 2003 Here are my scores at HD_speed.exe:On my Maxtor 40 GB 7200 rpm (doing some stuff at the same time, so may be biaised): an average speed of 57.4 MB/s.On my Maxtor 20 GB 5400 rpm (doing the same other stuff) I have an average of 37.3 MB/s.Burst rate seems to be slower (?) at 22.5 MB/s on my 20 GB drive. So it is on my 40 GB drive at 29.8 MB/s.I see that the rpm does have an influence, just have to ask AaronXP to post his mark so I can compare.
Aaron Posted September 11, 2003 Posted September 11, 2003 Western Digital 120GB 7,200rpm 8mb cache ATA100 on Master cableNormal: 47MB/sec | Burst: 71MB/sec----Western Digital 200GB 7,200rpm 8mb cache ATA100 on Slave cableNormal: 54MB/sec | Burst: 59MB/sec
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now