Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Sorry for asking what is probably a stupid question but lets say,

for instance, you have these two firewalls on your WPI...

Sygate Firewall

Tiny Firewall

Now, if you install two firewalls - thats just silly, but in the WPI

you could in theory tick both boxes. So my question is - how

can you set it so "IF" one firewall is ticked, the other one will

automatically be unticked?

I am sure WPI does this, I vaguely remember it being able

to do this but I can't remember the code!

It could be 2 firewalls, 2 antiviruses etc etc.

How could you do it if you had 2 firewalls, 2 antiviruses?

It isn't even firewalls and antiviruses I am planning to use its

just the question of how can you set it so if a box is ticked,

you can tick another box and it unticks the 1st box to prevent

you accidentally installing 2 firewalls or 2 antiviruses?


Posted

BUMP :whistle:

Sorry to be a pain.

So is there no way to configure WPI so that if you tick one box,

another box will automatically be unticked? This is so - if you

have say two firewalls on your WPI, you cannot accidentally

install both firewalls?

Please help! :blushing:

In C# code this can be done, its like this:

if (checkBox2.Checked == true) { checkBox1.Checked = true; checkBox2.Checked = false; }

if (checkBox1.Checked == true) { checkBox2.Checked = true; checkBox1.Checked = false; }

This is basically saying, there are 2 checkboxes side by side, if the 1st one is

ticked, the second one would automatically untick if the 2nd one happened to

be ticked and similarly, if the 2nd one is ticked, the 1st one would automatically

untick.

Of course this is only in C# and WPI is written in Java.

I am sure this is just a matter of Java code!

Please help! :blushing:

Posted

Eureka! :thumbup

So in simple terms.....

uid[pn]=['1'];

excl[pn]=['2'];

AND

uid[pn]=['2'];

excl[pn]=['1'];

So the excl[pn] gets its instruction directly from uid[pn]

Thanks for this, it is a great help! B)

Posted

Shortly that's it. But I thought it was easier to explain with an example...

Anyway, 5.4 will have a very nice inbuilt manual which will explain every feature in detail.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...