KB902400 is wrongly integrated on MCE

[Francesco]

I've integrated KB902400 along with XPize and other hotfixes (that all get completely integrated) but strangely the olecli32.dll installed by the cd is not the one present in KB902400 so windows update offers to install the update again. Any idea?

Here's the list of the patches I did integrate in the CD:

1. WindowsInstaller-KB893803-v2-x86.exe
   
2. WindowsMedia10-KB913800-x86-ITA.exe
   
3. WindowsMedia10-KB917734-x86-ITA.exe
   
4. WindowsXP-KB873339-x86-ITA.exe
   
5. WindowsXP-KB885835-x86-ITA.exe
   
6. WindowsXP-KB885836-x86-ITA.exe
   
7. WindowsXP-KB886185-x86-ita.exe
   
8. WindowsXP-KB888113-x86-ITA.exe
   
9. WindowsXP-KB888302-x86-ITA.exe
   
10. WindowsXP-KB890046-x86-ITA.exe
    
11. WindowsXP-KB890859-x86-ITA.exe
    
12. WindowsXP-KB891781-x86-ITA.exe
    
13. WindowsXP-KB893756-x86-ITA.exe
    
14. WindowsXP-KB894391-x86-ITA.exe
    
15. WindowsXP-KB896358-x86-ITA.exe
    
16. WindowsXP-KB896423-x86-ITA.exe
    
17. WindowsXP-KB896424-x86-ITA.exe
    
18. WindowsXP-KB896428-x86-ITA.exe
    
19. WindowsXP-KB898461-x86-ITA.exe
    
20. WindowsXP-KB899587-x86-ITA.exe
    
21. WindowsXP-KB899589-x86-ITA.exe
    
22. WindowsXP-KB899591-x86-ITA.exe
    
23. WindowsXP-KB900485-v2-x86-ITA.exe
    
24. WindowsXP-KB900725-x86-ITA.exe
    
25. WindowsXP-KB901017-x86-ITA.exe
    
26. WindowsXP-KB901214-x86-ITA.exe
    
27. WindowsXP-KB902400-x86-ITA.exe
    
28. WindowsXP-KB904706-x86-ITA.exe
    
29. WindowsXP-KB905414-x86-ITA.exe
    
30. WindowsXP-KB905749-x86-ITA.exe
    
31. WindowsXP-KB908519-x86-ITA.exe
    
32. WindowsXP-KB908531-v2-x86-ITA.exe
    
33. WindowsXP-KB910437-x86-ITA.exe
    
34. WindowsXP-KB911280-v2-x86-ITA.exe
    
35. WindowsXP-KB911562-x86-ITA.exe
    
36. WindowsXP-KB911567-x86-ITA.exe
    
37. WindowsXP-KB911927-x86-ITA.exe
    
38. WindowsXP-KB912919-x86-ITA.exe
    
39. WindowsXP-KB913580-x86-ITA.exe
    
40. WindowsXP-KB914388-x86-ITA.exe
    
41. WindowsXP-KB914389-x86-ITA.exe
    
42. WindowsXP-KB916281-x86-ITA.exe
    
43. WindowsXP-KB916595-x86-ITA.exe
    
44. WindowsXP-KB917159-x86-ITA.exe
    
45. WindowsXP-KB917344-x86-ITA.exe
    
46. WindowsXP-KB917953-x86-ITA.exe
    
47. WindowsXP-KB918439-x86-ITA.exe
    

Edited July 26, 2006 by Francesco

[bottled leaf]

instead of integrating all those hotfixes try using RyanVM's hotfix pack. It includes all the necessary ones.

[Francesco]

instead of integrating all those hotfixes try using RyanVM's hotfix pack. It includes all the necessary ones.

As you could note from the names i'm using italian version of windows I can't just go and integrate english hotfixes in it.

[bottled leaf]

Well then, go ahead and volunteer yourself

http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=75

Did you try manually putting the .dll back in?

Edited July 26, 2006 by bottled leaf

[Francesco]

Well then, go ahead and volunteer yourself

http://www.ryanvm.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=75

Did you try manually putting the .dll back in?

I don't want to put the dll back in I want to report this bug so it gets fixed. Or you prefer that this bug will be remain unseen and will cumulate with others exploding in somebody's else unattended CDs?

Oh my, the cd bugs are exploding!!! Run!!!!!!!!

Edited July 26, 2006 by Francesco

[bottled leaf]

Good point.

Sorry theres no italian.

Did this just happen? Have you used nlite before? Like an earlier version and this happen?

Oh my, the cd bugs are exploding!!! Run!!!!!!!!

Hmmm, thats not good. Get orken.

[Francesco]

Good point.

Sorry theres no italian.

Did this just happen? Have you used nlite before? Like an earlier version and this happen?

Oh my, the cd bugs are exploding!!! Run!!!!!!!!

Hmmm, thats not good. Get orken.

No I use a clean wizard every time I just drag&drop the patches and make the cd.

[nuhi]

If integration went well except that file that's no reason to panic.

And it's easier to mantain personal list of only needed hotfixes.

What could be is that some other hotfix overwritten that file with his newer version, are you sure you're using only public hotfixes?

I will try that file just to be sure.

edit: Please post a version of the installed file on your windows with mistaken file (olecli32.dll).

If you already reinstalled that hotfix manually then extract the olecli32.dl_ from the nlited cd.

[Francesco]

If integration went well except that file that's no reason to panic.

And it's easier to mantain personal list of only needed hotfixes.

What could be is that some other hotfix overwritten that file with his newer version, are you sure you're using only public hotfixes?

I will try that file just to be sure.

I pratically installed a clean MCE on a virtual machine, I went on WU and wrote on paper all the hotfixes. WU for MCE sucks sometimes it reports wrong updates (for example sometimes it reports update rollup 1 for MCE even if it's old) it took me 2 days to find out the correct list of updates so don't rely on WU use my list instead. Those are all MS fixes and I also integrated last version of XPize (I don't know if it contains such DLL since I couldn't extract its archive).

Also the KB902400 has the last version of that DLL so it is strange that nlite doesn't use the latest version.

[nuhi]

Well which version does nlite use, be sure, don't just guess default windows file?

It may be that xpize changed the file checksum then all would be fine you would just need to ignore the hotfix or skip that file with xpize (probably overwrite with clean file after xpize).

[Francesco]

Well which version does nlite use, be sure, don't just guess default windows file?

It may be that xpize changed the file checksum then all would be fine you would just need to ignore the hotfix or skip that file with xpize (probably overwrite with clean file after xpize).

The version is different from the one present in the KB902400 package: it's the version included in the windows cd.

[nuhi]

Hm it integrates fine with me...probably MCE special thing then.

Lately more and more MCE posts and every time I have to say that nLite doesn't support it yet.

While that is a fact, it's also a fact that with your reports it will be supported some day...when I download a trial, currently at a slow connection.

Saved this in todo...until then either replace that file by hand or someone else will confirm it and we'll see the reason.

[Francesco]

Hm it integrates fine with me...probably MCE special thing then.

Lately more and more MCE posts and every time I have to say that nLite doesn't support it yet.

While that is a fact, it's also a fact that with your reports it will be supported some day...when I download a trial, currently at a slow connection.

Saved this in todo...until then either replace that file by hand or someone else will confirm it and we'll see the reason.

Yes I already knew it does integrate well on normal XP this is why I wrote "is wrongly integrated on MCE" in the topic name. My adsl connection doesn't work well right now so I can't try to see if one of them gives problem because windows update takes ages to load.

[mikesw]

I noticed KB885250 OS update patch for ITA isn't listed here. Does MCE require this one?

I had a problem with Nlite v1.0.1 when trying to include it in my XP Home and Pro version when it was put before KB885835. (Numeric order).

I could directly integrate KB885835, but when just just patching the OS without direct integration, nlite

would complain about an unknown error occurred when it got to KB885835. If I did KB885835 by itself

either by direct or non-direct integration, it would be ok. Thus, Nlite has a problem here IMHO.

I was wondering if nlite keeps track of the latest version of the file being integrated or not as

the KB files are merged. Do I have to integrate files in a certain order to guarantee that the only

file version used in all the KB's being integrated is the newest one?

I've integrated KB902400 along with XPize and other hotfixes (that all get completely integrated) but strangely the olecli32.dll installed by the cd is not the one present in KB902400 so windows update offers to install the update again. Any idea?

Here's the list of the patches I did integrate in the CD:

1. WindowsInstaller-KB893803-v2-x86.exe
   
2. WindowsMedia10-KB913800-x86-ITA.exe
   
3. WindowsMedia10-KB917734-x86-ITA.exe
   
4. WindowsXP-KB873339-x86-ITA.exe
   
5. WindowsXP-KB885835-x86-ITA.exe
   
6. WindowsXP-KB885836-x86-ITA.exe
   
7. WindowsXP-KB886185-x86-ita.exe
   

[Francesco]

I noticed KB885250 OS update patch for ITA isn't listed here. Does MCE require this one?

I had a problem with Nlite v1.0.1 when trying to include it in my XP Home and Pro version when it was put before KB885835. (Numeric order).

I could directly integrate KB885835, but when just just patching the OS without direct integration, nlite

would complain about an unknown error occurred when it got to KB885835. If I did KB885835 by itself

either by direct or non-direct integration, it would be ok. Thus, Nlite has a problem here IMHO.

I was wondering if nlite keeps track of the latest version of the file being integrated or not as

the KB files are merged. Do I have to integrate files in a certain order to guarantee that the only

file version used in all the KB's being integrated is the newest one?

If it's not in my list it means that it has been replaced by a cumulative patch (maybe a MCE patch). The integrated hotfixes + some other MCE specific ones integrated with a postinstall make my installations show 0 available updates on WU. Unless WU screwes up the italian updates for MCE.

Edited July 26, 2006 by Francesco