tarquel Posted October 1, 2004 Posted October 1, 2004 Hi all@GM:Just wanted to mention that using wget over the opus downloader was a great choice - tried the wget tool a little while ago for my own scripting uses and its great.Thought I should mention that Norton Internet Security (firewall) did ask whether it should let it access the internet but when I allowed it, no problem at all. So many options in it - its crazy. I'm using the 1.9.1 version btw - worked great for me.Also, on the site, it mentioned about firewall issues, or was that in the html help file I downloaded - ahhh...its 4am - forgive me for not remembering.G'nite all N.
GreenMachine Posted October 3, 2004 Author Posted October 3, 2004 Indeed, WGET seems to be working. The firewall issues sometimes prevented iOpus from getting out. I have yet to try WGET from behind a proxy, but no reason that should not work ...
tarquel Posted October 5, 2004 Posted October 5, 2004 Yep...the only thing that asked me was Norton Internet Security (easy enough to choose 'Allow' and 'always' really hehe)... Windows or my hardware firewall (in my router) didnt prevent it so should be much better and its a lovely proggy to use N.
Famer Posted October 6, 2004 Posted October 6, 2004 GM after xpcreate states launching hotfix extraction scriptit says saving the cat files it says file not foundthis happens @ 20:02:42next error happens @ 20:07:27 files already in cabs are not new file not found stated twice20:07:28 files already in i386 are not new file not found20:07:28 add list of new files to [Files] in dosnet.infthe only errors i got so far if you like i can test the beta version if you want
GreenMachine Posted October 6, 2004 Author Posted October 6, 2004 Thanks, Famer, I think all of those will be gone in the next version. As soon as I finish this road trip, some time next week, I will put up the Next Version for all to test. Until then I haven't much debugging time, which is why I am waiting.
Famer Posted October 6, 2004 Posted October 6, 2004 Gm also the errors i posted above seem to have no ill effects on the slipstreaming of the programs. it looks to be just cosmetic. but i could be wrong
GreenMachine Posted October 15, 2004 Author Posted October 15, 2004 Right you are: those are only cosmetic errors. No need to worry! (They have been eliminated ... )
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now