tomasz86 Posted May 15, 2011 Posted May 15, 2011 (edited) I made a w2k version of KB2443685.December 2010 cumulative time zone update for Windows operating systems [2010-11-22]Windows2000-KB2443685-x86-ENU.exe Edited May 15, 2011 by tomasz86
WildBill Posted May 16, 2011 Author Posted May 16, 2011 WildBill,I hope you don't mind but I made a v2 version of KB981852 (MS10-047). The point was to add the "Mup.sys" file from the older M$ official KB979683. By doing so KB981852-v2 supersedes KB979683. I also added the original .CAT file from KB979683 so WU won't ask for KB979683 after having installed KB981852-v2.Windows2000-KB981852-v2-x86-ENU.exeI don't mind at all. Should I post it in my MediaFire patches folder and update the download link?In other news, I've ported MS11-019 and added it to the list.
tomasz86 Posted May 17, 2011 Posted May 17, 2011 (edited) I don't mind at all. Should I post it in my MediaFire patches folder and update the download link?It would be an honour for me Edited May 17, 2011 by tomasz86
tomasz86 Posted May 17, 2011 Posted May 17, 2011 (edited) I made a v5 of KB2479628. It contains a few very important changes:1. First of all, I wanted to do something about the compatibility with IE5 and IE6 systems respectively. I thought it would be better than having two separate versions - one for IE5 and one for IE6. V5 solves this problem as it can be installed on both IE5 and IE6 systems. I used the logic which I already mentioned few days ago.before (v4) and now (v5)The content of the xpsp2_binarydrop folder:The problematic file 'browseui.dll' is copied only if IE6 SP1 is installed. It's not copied at all when IE5.x is present. I also did a HFSLIP test and it's the same - 'browseui.dll' is integrated only if IE6 is present in HFCABS folder.2. KB2479628 supersedes three other unofficial updates - 2160329, 2436673, 2286198. From these three 2286198 supersedes the official update 967715 and 2436673 supersedes the official update 979559. In order to prevent Windows Update from asking for the two older superseded official updates (967715, 979559) I added their catalog files to KB2479628-v5. I also added the original XP catalog file of 2479628 as it gets registered in a 2K system without any problems.I did some extensive testing concerning this and I think it's a 100% success All the three .CAT files get registered in Windows and Windows Update does not ask for the two superseded updates anymore.Here you go Windows2000-KB2479628-v5-x86-ENU.exeIt replaces both KB2479628-v4 and KB2479628-v4-IE5. Edited May 17, 2011 by tomasz86
bristols Posted May 17, 2011 Posted May 17, 2011 I made a v5 of KB2479628. It contains a few very important changes:1. First of all, I wanted to do something about the compatibility with IE5 and IE6 systems respectively.(...)Windows2000-KB2479628-v5-x86-ENU.exeIt replaces both KB2479628-v4 and KB2479628-v4-IE5.Fantastic work!Thanks very much! Added to the Windows 2000 Post-SP4 Updates for HFSLIP page.
WildBill Posted May 18, 2011 Author Posted May 18, 2011 Great job! So that's what the catalog files are for...I had no idea that they would stop WU from nagging about updates. Did you also have to add them back to the .inf file?
tomasz86 Posted May 18, 2011 Posted May 18, 2011 (edited) I'm not sure whether all of these strings are absolutely necessary but I decided to input them just in case. [ProductCatalogsToInstall] is the one directly responsible for installing catalogs. Edited May 18, 2011 by tomasz86
tomasz86 Posted May 18, 2011 Posted May 18, 2011 I think I found a bug in KB2479628...Windows Live Toolbar icons in IE6 look strange:This is how they should be displayed:I don't have enough time now to test it more thoroughly... could anyone install the toolbar and check the icons?http://support.microsoft.com/kb/944026
tomasz86 Posted May 19, 2011 Posted May 19, 2011 (edited) Also there is something wrong with icons in Event Manager :/They look normal when I switch to 16-bit display mode. In case of Windows Live Toolbar, switching display modes doesn't make any difference Edited May 19, 2011 by tomasz86
tomasz86 Posted May 19, 2011 Posted May 19, 2011 I did some tests to find out which file was causing these problems and it's comctl32.dll.Unfortunately, it seems that comctl32.dll is the core responsible for displaying 32-bit icons.I tried to remove it but the explorer doesn't look very pretty
tomasz86 Posted May 21, 2011 Posted May 21, 2011 (edited) I prepared something special for today HBR Mini Rollup for Windows 2000 Professional1. What is it?HBR Mini Rollup is a roll-up style package which contains almost all so called hotfixes (by request) available for Windows 2000 Professional. Server version hotfixes are not included in this package. HBR stands for "hotfix (by request)".2. The following updates are included:Windows2000-KB818383-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB820227-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB819745-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB823442-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB832004-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB827475-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB830051-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB824025-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB888111-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB831375-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB831694-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB837789-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB840172-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB836726-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB830460-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB843125-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB843503-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB872955-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB873437-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB324446-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB883528-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB885927-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB838417-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB890202-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB892294-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB892993-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB892496-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB889317-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB180410-v2-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB896674-v2-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB897711-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB899904-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB904711-v2-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB898465-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB909916-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB915365-v2-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB915985-v2-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB917423-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB911589-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB922667-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB922823-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB919862-x86-ENU.EXEWindows2000-KB932590-x86-ENU.EXE3. Which hotfixes (by request) are not included?KB822834 - Server hotfixKB823658 - Server hotfixKB838018 - Front Page Extensions; Server only but if you use it on a W2k Pro system then you should install it separatelyKB906952 - Server hotfixKB896414 - problematic hotfix (uses HFSVCPACK_SW1 instead of HF folder)KB925783 - Server hotfix4. What is the purpose of this Rollup?The main reason for making this HBR Rollup is to simplify the process of slipstreaming hotfixes by using HFSLIP. This Rollup can be put directly into the HF folder. You do not have to and should not slipstream any of the hotfixes listed in point 2 because they are already included in this Rollup.The other reason is that in order to download a hotfix (by request) you have to input your e-mail address, rewrite a random code, download the hotfix from an URL sent on your e-mail address and use a password to unpack the file with the hotfix so it takes a lot of time to download all of them.5. Technical informationThe filename of HBR Rollup is Windows2000-KB932590-v2-x86-ENU.exe. KB932590 is the last hotfix (by request) released by Microsoft. HBR Rollup uses its filename and its catalog file too. Catalog files from the rest of the integrated hotfixes are also registered when installing this Rollup.KB915985-v2 is made by BlackWingCat and contains a modified ntdll.dll file. The rest of the integrated updates are the official ones from Microsoft.6. Screenshots 7. DownloadWindows2000-KB932590-v2-x86-ENU.exe (18.73 MB)@editThe URL temporary removed as the new version is coming soon @edit Edited May 23, 2011 by tomasz86
PROBLEMCHYLD Posted May 21, 2011 Posted May 21, 2011 (edited) Thank you soooooo much. We all appreciate what you are doing.It would be nice if you made like a Server 2000 rollup just with server updates/hotfixes. Edited May 21, 2011 by PROBLEMCHYLD
PROBLEMCHYLD Posted May 21, 2011 Posted May 21, 2011 Can you add these filesWINDOWS2000-KB918622-X86-ENU.EXEWINDOWS2000-KB948745-X86-ENU.EXEWINDOWS2000-KB957280-X86-ENU.EXEthanks
tomasz86 Posted May 21, 2011 Posted May 21, 2011 (edited) 1. There will be a server version 2. I'm basing all my updates on bristols' updates list. KB957280 is listed there as obsolete and the other two are not present at all. I can't tell now if they were also replaced by other hotfixes or they are missing from the list. Let's wait for bristols himself to say something about it.Please keep in mind that this is HBR Update Rollup so I'm not going to include any other, i.e. non- hotfix (by request) updates. Edited May 21, 2011 by tomasz86
PROBLEMCHYLD Posted May 21, 2011 Posted May 21, 2011 1. There will be a server version 2. I'm basing all my updates on bristols' updates list. KB957280 is listed there as obsolete and the other two are not present at all. I can't tell now if they were also replaced by other hotfixes or they are missing from the list. Let's wait for bristols himself to say something about it.Please keep in mind that this is HBR Update Rollup so I'm not going to include any other, i.e. non- hotfix (by request) updates.KB957280 has ntdsa.dll version 5.0.2195.7178and your rollup pack has ntdsa.dll 5.0.2195.6961
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now