Jump to content

reserved bandwidth


Recommended Posts


well i donno how far it works, but this is the procedure with Windows XP and above versions there is a QOS packet handler that gets installed with the network protocol, you can take back the reserved bandwidth by this, type gpedit.msc in run, in that computer configuration - administrative templates -network - QOS packet scheduler - limit reservable bandwidth - enable - change 20 to 0%. Hope this helps

Link to comment
Share on other sites

... type gpedit.msc in run...
thanks for reply but computer can't find it
Gpedit is only included with XP Pro.

ok im using xp home sp2 does reserved bandwidth count on that and

on task manager it reports network bypassing never passing 0.5%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?...B;EN-US;Q316666

Clarification about the use of QoS in end computers that are running Windows XP

As in Windows 2000, programs can take advantage of QoS through the QoS APIs in Windows XP. One hundred percent of the network bandwidth is available to be shared by all programs unless a program specifically requests priority bandwidth. This "reserved" bandwidth is still available to other programs unless the requesting program is sending data. By default, programs can reserve up to an aggregate bandwidth of 20 percent of the underlying link speed on each interface on an end computer. If the program that reserved the bandwidth is not sending sufficient data to use it, the unused part of the reserved bandwidth is available for other data flows on the same host.

For more information about the QoS Packet Scheduler, see Windows XP Help. Additional information about Windows 2000 QoS is available in the Windows 2000 technical library.

Back to the top

QoS it a non issue regardless of XP edition. if your network hardware does support it (and if it does its almost never enabled by default) then it could potentially use up to 20% of your bandwidth but it would have almost zero performance impact even in that most unlikely scenario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...