woi
-
Posts
20 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Donations
0.00 USD
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by woi
-
-
After almost 10 months of waiting, it's finally out for XP.
https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/releases/tag/v121
1 -
On 1/5/2024 at 1:17 PM, Dell-AA-Mayweather said:
Wait a second...how'd you get the oldest Chrome UI back on Supermium??
BTW, I really can't wait for Supermium to come to XP. My 22-year-old daughter's really curious about using XP in the now age!!
I didn't, the picture is from a tester. But once Supermium 121 releases this month, there should be a option to it in chrome://flags.
EDIT: Seems like they made it as the default by looking at the commits.
1 -
On 12/9/2023 at 10:07 AM, WinSuper2005 said:
Microsoft Edge 114 does not work on Windows Vista Extended Kernel with the KERNEL32.dll error called FindPackagesByPackageFamily missing dll. So we need to wait for 2024 ( next month )
Maybe you can try this Blaukovitch's modified Edge.
You really need to read what @AstragonQC says before begging win32ss for Chromium 112-122 support.
0 -
For those who are curious about the progress of win32ss getting Supermium to run on XP. It's from a tester.
ignore the ugly trapezoidal tabs. image is from here anyway https://www.reddit.com/r/windowsxp/comments/18p7wrn/shhhh/
3 -
On 9/19/2023 at 5:12 AM, schwups said:
... can't verify. On ME it looks the same to me as on XPSP3.
This is what I mean (It is something to do with the theme not being friendly with Windows Classic UI, not the OS/KernelEx itself):
Noticed that the URL and the Search bar got faded?
0 -
Fixed XPChrome link: https://github.com/weolar/xpchrome/releases
1 -
*removed*
0 -
On 10/29/2023 at 12:42 AM, Dixel said:
Besides, Supermium doesn't show the "suffer warning of no longer supported" about using it on XP/Vista. So his image is fake.
This is how Supermium actually looks like on Windows XP with OCAPI (and with buggy GDI rendering enabled by using XP comp + --single-process).
But Dibya accidentally used the wrong picture from OCAPI Github issues about someone managed to run crac_ked Chrome on XP.
For those who wondering about any updates of @win32 porting Supermium to XP/Vista (without extended kernel), here's a screenshot (from win32ss):
Works completely fine on Vista (without extended kernel) and extension and download works here, but XP is not finished yet (something has to be done).
2 -
On 9/30/2023 at 12:05 AM, Dibya said:
I forgot to say this earlier but the browser on that picture is not Supermium, but a crac_ked version of Google Chrome.
0 -
On 10/2/2023 at 7:28 AM, mina7601 said:
It crashes when I run it on XP Pro x64 with One-Core-API. No error messages appear though, just a file named debug.log appears in the same folder chrome.exe is located. I had to unzip the installer, as the installer itself crashes.
This is the contents of debug.log:
[1002/002813.372:ERROR:registration_protocol_win.cc(107)] CreateFile: The system cannot find the file specified. (0x2) [1002/002813.466:ERROR:crashpad_client_win.cc(142)] crash server failed to launch, self-terminatingOf course it is not possible to launch anything above Chrome 102 as of version 3.0.1 (and 75 for XP 64), however it is possible to launch above 102 (including Supermium/CatsXP 117/118) on XP 32 by adding some DLLs from Wine 8.16 staging (ncrypt and bcrypt) next to chrome.exe and add "--no-sandbox --single-process --disable-webgl". Just tested it on a VM and it seems to work fine (You still can't download files/extensions).
Edit: Since One Core API version 3.0.2 got released, you don't need those DLLs from Wine, just set compatibility mode to Vista and it should work (add --no-sandbox if it doesn't start). You most likely don't need to install One Core API when win32ss successfully ported Supermium to XP.
1 -
Also, there is some glitches at the title bar when using the Basilisk Photonic theme https://addons.basilisk-browser.org/addon/photonic/ (SP52). But it can be fixed by going to "Customize -> Title Bar to enable it.
It also happens on Windows 2000 (with Extended Kernel) as well, but it's not as bad as Windows 9x (no fading effect).
0 -
54 minutes ago, schwups said:
Note, that the Kstub.ini with RaiseException in core.ini must placed on the right to Kexbasen,Kexbases. It doesn't work, if it is on the left side.
For me it looks like this:
contents=std,kexbasen,kexbases.kstub824,kexvista
Not sure if I'm on the right track or not.
0 -
Now since I added RaiseException=v4 on my Kstub824.ini, tiktok.com and whatismybrowser.com now works fine with WebRTC enabled. Also I replaced Serpent 52 modified mozjs.dll and xul.dll with the one that is unmodified.
0 -
Yes, sometime it crashed on MSFN when media.peerconnection.enabled (WebRTC) is set to true (but it's rare and it doesn't crash most of the time). But since I disabled it, most of the websites that crashes now works fine (including MSFN).
EDIT: Forgot to say this but "Tiktok.com" doesn't work too (with WebRTC enabled).
0 -
However, some website that used to work on Firefox 52/Mypal 29 now doesn't work (example: whatismybrowser.com). Not sure if this is a issue from Serpent/KernelEx.
0 -
Thanks! Now I can run Serpent 52 and 55 on my Windows ME and Windows 98 (VM). The good thing is that for those who stuck on Firefox 48/45 ESR can use this browser by downloading the IA-32 version from https://o.rthost.win/basilisk and replace RaiseException with GetLastError on mozjs.dll and xul.dll (don't forget to add XP dlls and change dependentlibs.list).
Also, github.com works! (meaning that you can download files, etc). Not sure if it works on Serpent 55, if it's not then you can try Serpent 52 (because it is more stable than Serpent 55).
0 -
On 7/28/2023 at 5:22 AM, LostEntrepreneur439 said:
update - i got mypal68 to work, windows2 said it worked for them and on page 99 of this topic they posted their kernelex options, so i tried applying them to my kernelex, and mypal68 is now working.
*removed*
0 -
Take a look at this: https://github.com/JHRobotics/mesa9x It's a port of Mesa 17.3.9.2 to Windows 9x.
It's for VMs only and i got Minecraft running on it. I did not test it on real hardware yet, but you can give it a shot if you want to.
0
Supermium
in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Posted · Edited by woi
Yea it's kinda buggy but it actually works for me, tested with fully patched XP. May not work through