Posts posted by MilkChan
-
-
11 hours ago, Start Me Up said: What information should the list contain?
Do you need a simple list of the identifiers like this format:
Q1
KB7
KB9
That would be a bit difficult because not all updates have an identification number. For example the Media Player 9 was not released with an identifier.
Or are you looking for a table with additional information? I attached a table with the following information (where available):
Type of the update ("non security related bug fix", "security related bug fix" or "feature extension")
Identifier of the update (for example "KB123")
Identifier of the security report (for example "MS07-123")
Status ("has been superseded" or "current version")
Affected components (for example "Internet Explorer 6.0 with SP 1")
Contained files (for example "advpack.dll in version 7.00.5489.0")
The list is incomplete and in an early stage. The version from 25th of August 2026 contains information about 508 updates from Microsoft Corporation and noone else.
Or are you looking for the most detailed listing one can find on the Internet? If that's the case then you might want to look into OnTheServer's Knowledge Database. It contains a lot of information about each update but it doesn't have many updates. The version from 20th of June 2026 is in a very early stage and contains 55 updates from Microsoft Corporation and 6 updates from OnTheServer.de.
I've got the complete list, although it took me a lot of time yesterday.
I had to search the web archive and dig through old threads on MSFN.
thx
-
-
On 5/3/2025 at 2:32 PM, tomasz86 said: I do plan to keep the site up as long as I'm around
. I've also got some plans to at least try to update the non-working URLs to use the Wayback Machine linked to the original, now obsolete, Microsoft's sources. This way you won't need to trust myself when downloading them, e.g. from the Download Archive, as it the case right now.Are you still there? I'd like a list of updates for Windows 2000.
I have the files for all languages.
-
On 4/18/2026 at 7:33 PM, NotHereToPlayGames said:
Interesting.
Could the affected tell us what they have these settings at?
I have all three DISABLED (always have, will never use, DO NOT TRUST THEM).
It would be interesting to see if these "protections" are what is CAUSING this to those affected.
But... I don't even think these were present in Iron v109 (the oldest browser being affected, if I recall).
It seems to be having an effect, but I'll have to wait and see.
-
-
-
On 2/20/2026 at 11:57 PM, Egorkaru said:
This Windows Update URLs lists contains update KB959426 for Windows XP SP2 (x86), which adds the GetLogicalProcessorInformation WinAPI function to the KERNEL32.DLL system library. This function is required by certain Windows XP software compiled with Microsoft Visual C++ 2013/2015. This update can be installed using one of two commands in CMD.EXE:
- for English version of Windows XP SP2 (x86):
windowsxp-kb959426-x86-enu_9bdfabdec1c98057a92503cb00ce6ed623b517c5.exe /b:SP2QFE
- for Russian version of Windows XP SP2 (x86):
windowsxp-kb959426-x86-rus_dab83f6b847f62ed024e0a41035991bb0fd6b4e6.exe /b:SP2QFEHowever, this Windows Update URLs lists are missing update KB921337 for Windows XP SP2 (x86). This hotfix for the SXS.DLL system library fixes the 0xC000021A BSOD when running certain Windows XP software that work correctly on Windows XP SP3 (x86).
Is there an update for the SXS.DLL system library on Windows XP SP2 (x86) listed in this Windows Update URLs lists that replaces the missing update KB921337? If yes, which one?
I have KB943232, which is newer than what you're looking for, and it your Russian language.
-
On 3/4/2026 at 8:29 PM, modnar said:
@MilkChan Would you also please also make a KB for 2003SP2 original fltMgr (5.2.3790.3959)? While it has a local vulnerability, it's the fastest for XP.
Let's Go KB933215-v2
https://mega.nz/file/msAHRYBQ#4yqci00ly1YwSOxroe5BgWsNsLJc5vSiaTP2NrI9OCo
-
On 3/4/2026 at 8:29 PM, modnar said:
@MilkChan Would you also please also make a KB for 2003SP2 original fltMgr (5.2.3790.3959)? While it has a local vulnerability, it's the fastest for XP.
ahh OK
-
4 hours ago, gooface said:
Last time I made an ISO for Windows XP x64 I followed this, do you have a more updated list of what needs installed now?
Is it just:
1. 5eraph_Windows_XP_x64_Post-SP2_UpdatePack_ENU_Ver20250522
2. 5er_IE8_Addon_2019-08_ENU_x64_TLS
3. WMP11 x64-AddonENU-v2
?
In the past I installed:
1.5eraph_Windows_XP_x64_Post-SP2_UpdatePack_ENU_v2019-08-HotfixTZ
2.5er_IE8_Addon_2019-08_1_x64
3.OnePiece_Microsoft_WinUsb_2.0_XPx64_True_Addon
4.Kernel Mode 1.9XP64_addon
5.WMP11 XPVer2003x64-v4_Addon
6.5er_NT5.2_EoS_FlashAX_32.0.0.465_SIAddon Flash Player
Thanks!
Before that, it was outdated. The current version should be installed. Some addons I already integrated into UpdatePacks are not needed. Because I fixed several important bugs even installing Realtek Audio Driver.
-
-
-
7 hours ago, modnar said:
The WorkAround for WinXP SP3 fltMgr (build 5512) with Tag=1 for now is (obeying "Tag" rules and similar to other Windows' configurations):
1.) Go into regedit (Run: regedit), HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE/System/CurrentControlSet/Services/FltMgr, make sure that it has "Tag" [DWORD] value of "1" (0x00000001).
2.) Go into HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE/System/CurrentControlSet/Control/Filesystem and make sure only these three settings are in there (factory XP_SP3 settings):
NtfsDisable8dot3NameCreation [DWORD] 0x00000000 (0) Win31FileSystem [DWORD] 0x00000000 (0) Win95TruncatedExtensions [DWORD] 0x00000001 (1)3.) If fltMgr service has Tag=1, you can then go to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE/System/CurrentControlSet/Control/GroupOrderList/FSFilter Infrastructure and edit it so it reads:
03 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 03 00 00 00.
4.) Restart and enjoy extra responsiveness without any ill-effects.
Oh, by the way, @MilkChan you packed the wrong fltMgr in the KB44xxxxxx package, the beta build instead of 6912.
WindowsXP-KB4512787-x86-ENU
build 6912 : https://mega.nz/file/T5gmCYBB#iogwxoD7JCY3-RIbW83J3CfcAKgmZ8zJDbP_k3YicOY
-
Edited by MilkChan
On 12/25/2025 at 10:50 PM, VistaLover said:Both, very old (end of 2017), links to WindowsXP-KB936235-v2 (EN) and/or WindowsXP-KB944340 (EN) return 404 currently
...
KB936235 : info file newversion
KB955988 Replace the Cimwin32.dll file.KB2676562 Leak Update Version for SP2 Replace all nt kernel & system files
KB944340 : info file newversion
KB2676562 Leak Update Version for SP2 Replace the kernel32.dll file.
You can get all my Source Files Update Packs SP2 here.
I would like everyone to archive them. Because they hotfix share is gone forever.https://drive.google.com/file/d/15B55MqPXmJlbSx3Uc4qNmXpsaUH63oBt/view?usp=sharing
my link backup in archive.org
https://archive.org/details/windows-2000-post-sp4-update-pack
https://archive.org/details/windows-xp-post-sp1-update-pack
https://archive.org/details/windows-xp-post-sp2-update-pack
https://archive.org/details/windows-xp-post-sp3-update-pack
https://archive.org/details/windows-xp-and-server-2003-x64-update-pack
https://archive.org/details/windows-server-2003-x86-update-pack_202506 -
1 hour ago, modnar said:
Thank you, @MilkChan for these two builds. 7-zip and WinZip here says the second, SSE2 update is corrupt - would you mind updating the archive, please?
Thank you, @Multibooter for testing.
The funniest thing now is upon re-configuration of my mini-filters, my system works better than ever before with the 5512 XPSP3 fltmgr and filter cascade. I also put TimeOutValue = 3c (60) (s) DWORD before minifilter re-config in my "disk" service (CurrControlSet) that for some reason did not exist in my harkaz-updated SP2 (to uSP4) XP. That might have had the most to do with it...
Nothing was damaged. This is because I use the same SFXCAB installer that Microsoft uses when distributing Updates.
The file is still normal.
7z or WinRAR are not useful because I create compressed files. -
14 minutes ago, Multibooter said:
Thanks for mentioning fltmgr.sys build 6750/KB4493563 in your posts. Build 6750 works OK on my SSE-only Inspiron 7500. The Properties sheet of fltmgr.sys indicates as File Version: 5.2.3790.6750 (srv03_sp2_qfe_escrow.190315-1901), no idea what "escrow" specifically refers to.
On my Inspiron 7500 with a Pentium IIi ["SSE-only" =Non-SSE2] I have tested/run OK the following versions of fltmgr.sys:
- MS fltmgr.sys v5.1.2600.2180 (WinXP SP2 32bit, 4Aug2004-19Jan2005)
- MS fltmgr.sys v5.1.2600.5512 (WinXP SP3 32bit, 13Apr2008)
- MS fltmgr.sys v5.2.3790.3959 (Win2003 SP2 32bit, 17Feb2007)
- MS fltmgr.sys v5.2.3790.5107 (KB2839229, 7Jan2013)
- MS fltmgr.sys v5.2.3790.6750 (KB4493563, 16Mar2019)
- MS fltmgr.sys v5.2.3790.6912 (KB4512787, 11Jul2019)The above versions of fltmgr.sys work under both Non-SSE2 and SSE2. I don't use a special installer, just a file-copy after booting into another operating system.
"MS fltmgr.sys v5.1.2600.2180 (WinXP SP2 32bit, 4Aug2004-19Jan2005)" is a leftover on my Inspiron 7500 in \$ntservicepackuninstall$\,
after the upgrade from WinXP SP2 to SP3. Its timestamp is 4Aug2004 and its file modificaton date is 19Jan2005info here It states that :
Sometimes Microsoft released builds referred to as “Escrow”. Escrow means the development of a branch gets stopped and the code is being tested. If Microsoft or its testers don’t discover any serious bugs (“showstoppers”), the current build becomes the final milestone (usually RC or RTM, but sometimes there are also beta escrow builds). Escrow builds are usually handed out to TAP (Technology Adoption Program) testers, ISVs, IHVs, etc.http://www.windowswiki.info/2010/01/10/what-does-idsidw-mean-and-what-are-escrow-builds/
-
8 hours ago, modnar said:
Exactly! I'm glad you noticed the difference! That is how much filter manager is important for the system (it's a tree that all mini-filters are branches of) and bloody Microsoft scum put such pile of horse manure into WindowsXP_SP3!!! Outrageous! I'm superglad it works out for you.
I'm glad it works well for you too! It's such an important part of the system and really can make a difference. I just don't know how on my multi core and multi partition and multi disk system it can't work right... Sigh.
me have some knowledge of modifying Microsoft installer files.
I've modified the update.inf file to a single file and removed files from Server 2003,
except for fltmgr.sys, because it contains necessary registry entries.
-
On 12/21/2025 at 11:14 PM, modnar said:
Indeed. I have the KB4512788 (x86 for Win2003 Server); it contains fltmgr build 6912 and all 4 kernel HALs again and also kernel. This fltmgr works in XPSP3/uSP4, but hitches even more than 5107...
If this thing would work normally in XP, it is a much better experience because it isn't maimed like the XPSP3_fltmgr_build5512 is. When it works, the system feels much more robust as WinNT always used to feel when coming from / dual booting 98 and NT4 and NT5. Now XP just because of this one very low level component feels like Windows 98. But hey, it's all we've got so it'll have to be enough until someone backports a proper fltmgr for it.
KB3045999
There's also fltmgr.sys same version
5.2.3790.5107 (srv03_sp2_qfe.130106-1434)I installed it today as I specified,
and saw the difference compared to Windows XP before the update file.
It's as you said, but didn't have any problems with the ESU Update version KB4493563.
-
-
On 12/12/2025 at 3:42 PM, Start Me Up said:
Hello Windows 2000 fans,
when using vanilla Windows 2000 with a rather new version of win32k.sys, there is a bug in the function "fsg_RunPreProgram" which reduces that drawing quality of some fonts. This bug was fixed with the version 5.00.2195.7610 by Microsoft. However, it was reintroduced into the operating system shortly afterwards, so it still exists in the newest version of win32k.sys (5.00.2195.7640).
To fix this bug there are 2 ways:
- Use Extended Kernel 3.1H or newer. Blackwingcat fixed this bug.
- If you don't like or can't install Extended Kernel, there is now a second option available: WINDOWS2000-OTSKB3037639-V1-X86-INTL.exe
There is an article in the knowledge database available with more information on the nature of this bug.
There is some more auxilliary information available, which I do not plan to distribute among end users: code.htm
---
If someone likes to help with an upcoming Windows 2000 update: I am looking for Windows XP updates which contain a version of win32k.sys. My list of known updates is currently pretty short:
- KB3013455 contains version 5.1.2600.6712
- KB3034344 contains version 5.1.2600.6755
- KB4039384 contains version 5.1.2600.7334
Thank you.
You should go to this link. There will be a txt file containing:
Links to all Microsoft files uploaded directly to the MS Catalog.
In all languages.
So you can find all the files you need.https://msfn.org/board/topic/182599-nt-5x-windows-update-urls-dump-inc-custom-support-updates/
-
4 hours ago, jumper said:
I'll look into it.
12 hours ago, assenort said:Thank you, @jumper, for patching the MS Office 2010 MSO.DLL file (x32-bit version).
Can you please do the same for the 64-bit version too? Thanks in advance :-)
Greets!
It seems like abbodi1406 has already done that in
# Office 2010 MSI Upsourcer
You should try it.Link : https://mega.nz/file/LgZyCZxa#ew7SgnszJXa8lX0miZAIQk6qGQJljiRxSunc-ynaSow
-
-
14 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said:
My Office is 2007, so I may not be of much help.
But maybe this will fix your issue (article cites your exact issue but on Windows 2000) -- https://superuser.com/questions/1504407/office-2003-cant-open-newer-office-files
More specifically, solution was to use "version 2" of the compatibility pack (linked in superuser article) -- https://www.malavida.com/en/soft/microsoft-office-compatbility-pack/download
"This is a pre-release version of the Compatibility Pack and can only open pre-release Office 2007 files."
= This is a problem with MSVCRT.DLL in Windows 2000.
I have created Update KB926436-v2 to fix this issue in Windows 2000.You can use the latest version.
MEGA
Thanks for the information from 2013.
https://msfn.org/board/topic/161323-msvcrtdll-without-_resetstkoflw-w2k/ -
2 hours ago, Start Me Up said:
zip file? Which zip file? I have no zip file with this name. Anyway, I found them on Microsoft's server.
???????
You didn't check these links of mine which have all the files you need
https://archive.org/details/windows-2000-post-sp4-update-pack
https://archive.org/details/windows-xp-post-sp1-update-pack
https://archive.org/details/windows-xp-post-sp2-update-pack
https://archive.org/details/windows-xp-post-sp3-update-pack
https://archive.org/details/windows-server-2003-x86-update-pack_202506
https://archive.org/details/windows-xp-and-server-2003-x64-update-pack


Root Certificates and Revoked Certificates for Windows XP
in Windows XP
·
Edited by MilkChan
Okay, I accidentally deleted some photos from IBB.