Jump to content

Vistapocalypse

Member
  • Posts

    1,082
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    14
  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    United States

Posts posted by Vistapocalypse

  1. 47 minutes ago, AstroSkipper said:

    Although I can't say much about the quality of its protection, you have the option of installing the Avira Scan Engine which increases the detection rate of this programme considerably, as AV-Test has shown in the follow-up version 9.2. Here is an image taken from the test:


    Test_Antivirus-Programme_Qihoo_360_I_AV-
     

    That brings back memories about a company that has long been deemed untrustworthy by many in the West:

    https://www.computerworld.com/article/2917384/antivirus-test-labs-call-out-chinese-security-company-as-cheat.html

     

  2. 11 hours ago, WSC4 said:

    I have given up on Panda and have decided it is not suitable for XP 64-bit and will move on and try others.

    I am more favorably disposed toward Avast/AVG 18.8 than AstroSkipper is, but once again the system requirements specified “XP SP3*” with an asterisk indicating a footnote: “Both the 32- and 64-bit versions...” Do they not know that Service Pack 3 only exists in a 32-bit version?

    I have no idea whether or not Kaspersky 18 supported XP x64. I can tell you that it required .NET 4 and did not require SSE2.

    Good luck with your testing! :)

  3. 6 hours ago, mina7601 said:

    so yes, it is referring to a different Panda product.

    It would be very strange if some Panda products support XP x64 while others only support XP SP3 x86. Not inconceivable perhaps, but the contradictory information is more likely attributable to a writer who is not very knowledgeable about Windows XP. It will be interesting to hear from WSC4 if he tests Panda.

  4. 5 hours ago, WSC4 said:

    I think I need to try more that you recommend.  Your second choice is Panda Antivirus.  I'll try this and let you know.

    There appears to be contradictory information about Panda’s system requirements with respect to Windows XP. It is said to be compatible with “SP3 or higher” here (as mentioned by AstroSkipper in his page 1 article on Panda), which would seem to exclude XP x64. On the other hand, the  minimum requirements here specifically mention “32 and 64-bit,” but might perhaps refer to a different Panda product. (I’m not very familiar with Panda’s products due to a bad experience 8 years ago.) So yes, confirmation from an XP x64 user would be enlightening. :)

  5. 4 hours ago, alzcore397 said:

    eset, kaspersky.

    There is no free version of ESET, and the original poster is already a Kaspersky user looking for a free alternative. However this discussion has clearly left the OP’s question behind, and the products you mention are good choices. :)

  6. Windows 10 and 11 users can and IMO should simply use Microsoft’s built-in antivirus protection. (No, I’m not the “Kaspersky salesman” as you-know-who likes to insinuate. If MSE was still an option for XP, then there wouldn’t be any Windows XP antivirus thread at all.) Of course every other antivirus product is struggling for a share of the Windows 10/11 pie, but the going is tough - which is why there have been so many mergers in recent years.

  7. Now that that’s finally been settled, I would like to suggest adding Norton to the blacklist on page 1 as another “Should be avoided” product. This should not cause any controversy, since no one at MSFN has admitted using Norton for as long as I can remember. I believe the final maintenance mode version was 22.15.5.40, and definition updates were never cut off AFAIK, but it’s hard to be certain when you don’t know of any XP users with a Norton licence.

    https://community.norton.com/en/blogs/product-update-announcements/norton-2215-windows-xp-windows-vista-windows-7-sp0-now-available

  8. 4 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said:

    Do we even have a section dedicated to SMART PHONES?  That is the ONLY thing that "kids these days" even USE!

    But why would we have a section dedicated to SMART PHONES, wouldn't we need a "mobile version" of the web site for them to even visit?

    It is not only “kids these days” who are using smart phones. My mother (may she rest in peace) actually had an iPhone (a gift from my sister) before I did, since I was so attached to my old Vista PC in those days. And not only in the United States: My recent reading about app bans in India leaves little doubt that practically everyone in that country uses a smart phone.

    MSFN works fine from my iPhone! One thing I cannot seem to do that was quite possible using a PC is insert a quotation from an external source, although quoting other posts in the same thread is no problem.

    I doubt that the OP will find page 2 very helpful, but I already answered as best I could on page 1.

  9. On 8/4/2023 at 9:48 AM, VistaLover said:

    ... Technically speaking, Sandboxie can't/shouldn't be regarded as a proper Antivirus/Internet Security Suite and/or a third party firewall application, as is the case with the software on the list you linked to :P ...

    You’re right: It was not “odd” that only Sandboxie and not Kaspersky mentioned a conflict between the two. :)

    Speaking of Kaspersky: AV Test has recently posted test results for June 2023. It almost goes without saying that Kaspersky is still a “top product,” but I note that the German government has still not pressured the lab into parroting any FUD about Kaspersky. To me, this is a healthy sign that Germany is still a free country. 🇩🇪

    https://www.av-test.org/en/antivirus/home-windows/windows-10/june-2023/kaspersky-lab-standard-21.13-231311/

  10. It might be a little late to warn the original poster about how “harmful” Kaspersky supposedly is because he is already a paid Kaspersky user looking for a free alternative.

    On 8/10/2023 at 2:51 PM, tekkaman said:

    I have been too busy and haven't had the time to check Kaspersky on XP.

    Kaspersky 18 is still an option for XP, and probably 19 (but there is no official download link for a KFA 19 installer).

  11. On 8/6/2023 at 12:49 PM, Vistapocalypse said:

    ...India has banned TikTok along with many other Chinese apps, ostensibly to protect the personal data of its citizens - although the policy evidently began after a deadly border clash with Chinese forces in June 2020:

    https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-53225720

    That link is only one among many and I have certainly not read them all, but India’s list of banned Chinese apps has subsequently grown from dozens to hundreds...

    Here’s a critical analysis of India’s app bans from Atlantic Council that I am inclined to agree with:

    https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/southasiasource/the-problem-with-indias-app-bans/

  12. I chose to ignore my Ignored Users list and take a peek at your post, and was pleasantly surprised to find that it wasn’t calculated to offend me!?? As an MSFN member, there is little I can do about the lack of basic freedoms in China or Russia. The “free-speech” I was referring to was speech right here at MSFN. 

    On June 2 an MSFN member with an actual Russian flag directed a question     about Kaspersky to the only member who has reported success with it (or indeed with any real-time antivirus) on Vista x64 with extended kernel, and neither member was harassed by the usual suspects, which is highly commendable! Evidently it is not Russians who must be harassed for daring to mention Kaspersky here, but only an American such as myself who doesn’t show the proper respect for government warnings?

    Here in the USA, cigarette packs have featured government warnings for perhaps half a century, but I still smoke. Every road has a posted speed limit, but I still drive somewhat faster than that (albeit not nearly as fast as I drove in my youth).

    It seems to me that Kaspersky’s critics don’t show the proper respect for test results by independent labs such as AV Test in Germany, where Kaspersky has long been a top product. Everything else seems anecdotal to me. Let me remind you that NATO is not at war (and if we ever are, may God help us).

  13. 5 hours ago, vinifera said:

    Trend Micro House Call

    Malwarebytes Antimalware

    Malwarebytes Premium is not free and Malwarebytes Free is not an antivirus, whereas the original post inquired about a “free antivirus” - but true enough, Malwarebytes still supports Windows 7 assuming one did not skip the SHA-2 update (which is also required by MSE, ESET, etc.)

  14. As an MSFN member, one thing I would never do is create multiple accounts in order to harass other members and give myself false “reputation.” :no:

    I’m sure that India’s immense oil purchases are of infinitely greater assistance to Russia than e.g. an XP user choosing to use a legacy version of Kaspersky because it is his best remaining option. (For the record, my advice for users of Windows 10 and 11 is simply to use Microsoft’s built-in protection and completely forget about third-party antivirus products.) Nevertheless, I thought India’s ban of hundreds of Chinese apps might be thought-provoking, but perhaps I overestimated the “new” MSFN.

  15. My apologies for bumping this topic, but it has come to my attention that India has banned TikTok along with many other Chinese apps, ostensibly to protect the personal data of its citizens - although the policy evidently began after a deadly border clash with Chinese forces in June 2020:

    https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-53225720

    That link is only one among many and I have certainly not read them all, but India’s list of banned Chinese apps has subsequently grown from dozens to hundreds

    I certainly do not wish to start an argument, but this does raise difficult questions about proper forum conduct. As an MSFN member, should I show my solidarity with the “world’s largest democracy” (not to mention the fairly large democracy I was born in) by discouraging the use of TikTok, and perhaps even all Chinese software? Would this not contradict the free-speech position I have taken with respect to Kaspersky (which is a Russian company in case someone still doesn’t know that)?  Might it be considered racist to even point out the Chinese origins of software? (If so, then I might be guilty - a rare occasion when my chief antagonist expressed approval for one of my posts.) Might it be considered racist to attach greater weight to software bans by Western governments than to software bans by the government of India? 🤔

    The wisdom of avoiding all political topics here is becoming increasingly clear to me. Have a nice day. :)

  16. On 8/2/2023 at 11:12 AM, Vistapocalypse said:

    Here is a link for the old Sandboxie webpage describing Known Conflicts:

    https://sandboxie-website-archive.github.io/www.sandboxie.com/KnownConflicts.html

    Kaspersky was indeed listed...

    Oddly enough, Sandboxie was not mentioned in Kaspersky’s list of incompatible applications for 2018 (although Comodo certainly was):

    https://support.kaspersky.com/us/kav2018/install/13598#block2

  17. 22 hours ago, Vistapocalypse said:

    Incompatibilities are good news? I recall reports that Sandboxie was incompatible with Kaspersky. 

    Here is a link for the old Sandboxie webpage describing Known Conflicts:

    https://sandboxie-website-archive.github.io/www.sandboxie.com/KnownConflicts.html

    Kaspersky was indeed listed (among other software), but IDK if this old information is applicable to SBIE 5.40, which Sampei.Nihira mentioned in a December 2020 post.

×
×
  • Create New...