Jump to content

Killjoy

Member
  • Posts

    41
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    Serbia

Posts posted by Killjoy

  1. EDIT: I tested this just now, and the result is: No, we don't need the KB951376 hack for KB2862330.

    Here is what I've done. I installed XP on a VirtualBox VM with the virtual USB controller explicitly disabled. On such system, only usb8023.sys driver is installed (but not loaded). The rest of these files are not installed at all (they reside in DRIVER.CAB and SP3.CAB so that users don't need to insert the XP CD when system needs the driver)

    I've tried just the same thing and you are correct Explorer.

    Just DISABLE USB during setup of XP and 2862330 will be installed correctly.

    Good job E09. :D

  2. I've got a same problem, but I updated "update pack" (hofixes from -X-'s pack) until November.

    I'm not using IE8 and his fixes, I use IE6 + hotfixes for IE6.

    KB2862330 is the same problem with me.

    We are using different update packs and 2862330 is still problem.

    That is not your mistake, not mine and not -X-'s mistake.

    There something wrong with hotfix itself.

    Let's hope that -X- will fix it with some "cab" archive (repack) of 2862330. ;)

  3. While I won't argue that your VLK key works with your downloaded VL ISO, unless you have a TechNet subscription and downloaded the ISO directly from MS, your ISO is considered warez, ie not obtained from an authorized source in a lawful and authorized manner. So please make no more mention of it at all on this forum. Mentioning it further or discussing it will risk you being banned. And as submix8c reminded you. if you did obtain a VL ISO from anywhere other than directly from MS, unless its MD5 hash matches those from TechNet, just because your key works does not mean that your source is clean with no surprises lurking.

    Cheers and Regards

    Misunderstanding.

    I've downloaded ISO just in puposes of testing not piracy or something. I couldn't do something like that to my company.

    I'm loyal as puppy.

    Windows from my company is bought with SP2 already on it.

    I just want to try CLEAN Windows + SP3 + hotfixes.

  4. OK fine, REMOVE the IE8 files from -X- Updates. IGNORE WMP11. YOU are responsible for the IE6 Updates as -X- has made them "Obsolete".

    If u agree, whole XP is almost obsolete, not only IE6.

    We all using Firefox or Chrome....maybe Opera.

    ADD all -X- Updates and SORT them. THEN add YOUR files.

    How in the WORLD can nLite Slip Updates to an Add-On that has NOT YET BEEN SLIPPED?

    1 - Include an Add-On

    2 - NOW include an Add-On fix so nLite can OVERLAY the ORIGINALS

    See? Order is Important...

    That make sense.

    Verstehen Sie?

    Jawohl mein Führer. :D

    BIG GIANT P.S. - MS said you can't INSTALL the Service Pack on a RUNNING system, that does NOT include Slipstreaming!

    Well I didn't know that! My mistake.

  5. -X- does NOT provide "Optional Updates" and that was SPECIFICALLY STATED in the OTHER "How to Integrate" Topic. You have not been paying attention.

    I know that. Just asking myself.

    DO NOT BOTHER with SP2 - My Topic INCLUDED the SP3, did it not? :yes:

    You can's slip SP3 onto CLEAN XP!

    Well at least I didn't try and MS said that you need at least SP1 to slip SP3 onto XP.

    Downloading the "extras" now. Are you integrating them in the correct order? (will check your LastSession.)

    Are u kidding me???

    For a five years I'm listening about ORDER of hotfixes and that the order is not important.

    P.S. -

    Downloaded a VL - really? Are you SURE it's "clean"?

    And... DOWNLOADED? REALLY??? :ph34r:

    Well yeah!

    My LEGAL VLK works only with VL Windows.

    Actually, I have downloaded Windows RTM Retail, OEM and VL.

    I've tried all of them and my product code works only with VL version (no yellow "sticker" during setup with 25 digits (x)).

    edit -

    Found your problem, Slick! You ignored the ORIGINAL instructions about SORT ORDER! Congratulations for not reading the instructions. :whistle::thumbup

    Do it ALL OVER again, and do EXACTLY as stated in Other Topic, THEN one-by-one add the "real" Add-On's AFTERWARD. Order IS important! :yes:

    I haven't tried the OTHER files DIRECTLY from MS that you tried to "add" but they MAY not be able to Integrate directly. ;)

    Yes well..... Mister -X- told me few times before that ORDER is not important....and that I should put ALL OF MY and HIS addons into one slipstream process.

    But that was long ago...maybe he wasn't aware of the ORDER....nevermind.

    Oh yes!

    Just to think of it....I don't even need IE.

    I'm using it only for update of Windows so...I'll stay on IE6.

    And in "my eyes" WMP 9 is far better than WMP 11. :D

    Just tell me once more.....

    1st slipstream I should use only files from -X- package??? And sort them BY BUILD DATE???

    And then what?

    Put the rest of the addons into 2nd slipstream process???

    DX, .NET and other KB's???

    And sorting order (I GUESS) is not important for them???

    Oh yes, can REMOVE some of the Windows components?

    Is it safe to remove MSN, Windows Messenger, Internet Games and similar cr*p from Windows???

    And should I remove them BEFORE or AFTER slipping???

  6. Problem occurs guys!

    I'm using -X-'s update pack WITH IE8 and his fixes.

    Hotfix IE8-WindowsXP-KB2817183-x86-ENU won't slipstream into setup.

    I've downloaded PURE/CLEAN Windows XP (VL) setup since my product key is VLK.

    Slipstreamed first SP2 than SP3.

    Within -X-'s hotfixes and updates, I'm using few more from WinCert forums, OnePiece's addons and few extra fixes from MS.

    KB942288 v3

    KB961118

    KB981669

    KB2492386

    DirectX 9.0c Runtimes Addon;

    .Net FX 1.1 + hotfixes addon;

    .Net FX 3.5 + hotfixes addon;

    VC+VB Runtimes + Legacy Runtimes.

    I'll provide you a link if u want for those "extra" addons.

    And BTW, IE 8 won't work as it should be....as IE6. Ie6 without a problem goes to MS Update webpage and showes me updates.

    IE8 take time to check for updates on MS site.

    updatesxg.png

    I have used only your (-X-'s) update pack with old hotfixes and updates for IE6 instead IE8 and WITHOUT mine (additional) addons: .NET, DirectX etc.

    Everything is OK.

    P.S. I've replaced DotNET 3.5 with 2.0 due to a longer installation of XP (20 minutes more than usual).

    Problem is next:

    Some of my additional addons are making problem! WHICH ONE???

    WindowsXP-KB942288-v3-x86.exe

    WindowsXP-KB981669-x86-ENU.exe

    WindowsXP-KB2492386-x86-ENU.exe

    OnePiece .NET v1.1

    OnePiece .NET v2.0

    www.mediafire.com/?tqu9nska2ai62c4

    Visual c++ 2005 SP1 v8.0.50727.6229

    Visual c++ 2008 SP1 v9.0.30729.7497

    Visual c++ 2010 SP1 v10.0.40219.436

    ge.tt/api/1/files/1gjgKIb/0/blob?download

    Visual c++ 2012 ATL v11.0.51106.1

    ge.tt/api/1/files/736UbIb/0/blob?download

    Microsoft Legacy Runtimes

    Legacy Microsoft VB and VC Runtimes completing the VC8+9+10 Addons

    Contains: VC1, VB1-4 and VC7 runtimes

    Native in XP: VB5-VB6 and VC2-VC6

    ge.tt/api/1/files/3VpScIb/0/blob?download

    Bolded links just copy into address bar of your browser!

    P.S. I've just checked MS Update Webpage and it reports me this.

    updatesx.png

    It is very interesting that Windows Installer 4.5 IS AN OPTIONAL UPDATE and still not offered by MS.

    OK, .NETs are understandeable offered....

    What's with the root cert from December???

    I thought that December one was "outdated" and the new certificates are in january Release.

    LAST SESSION.INI

  7. Yeah, just download and run the latest UDC script in which IE6 has been replaced with IE8.

    My GOD!

    I'm a dumbas*!

    I don't understand a half of the first post.

    I only want to REPLACE IE6 with IE8.

    I don't want to see the trace of IE6 like it never existed on XP.

    Is that possible???

    As -X- said.

    No, you're not a @#$%....

    Edited first post for clarification (third paragraph)... no longer "clear as mud". ;)

    I guees that complete IE8 is in UDC pack???

    Thanks guys!

    I've just tried your whole pack within XP sp3.

    As before and ALWAYS one of the IE hotfixes is not slipped properly, 2817183.

    But, I'm using few optional updates from WinCert forums:

    Addon DirectX Runtimes;

    Addon OnePiece DotNet 1.1 and 2.0 + their hotfixes;

    Addon VB + VC + Legacy Runtimes;

    KB942288 Windows Installer 4.5

    KB981669 Windows Installer 4.5 Hotfix

    KB961118 .NET 1.1 hotfix (not included in Addon Pack);

    KB2492386

    But AS always one of the hotfixes for IE6 or IE8 whatever is not slipped properly.

    Anybody knows WHY???

  8. Hey, hey, hey......I'm back again! :D

    Just joking!

    Hello! How r u?

    Small problem with one of the new hotfixes within your new updates pack.

    Hotfix is for IE6 KB2722913.

    WinUpdate site is showing KB2722913 still available for update and installation.

    screenshot1vd.png

    I've got your pack for slipstream (14th August), PLUS :

    KB942288 v3 --> WinInstaller 4.5

    KB961118 --> .NET 1.1 fix

    KB981669 --> Win Installer FIX

    KB2492386 --> Optional), PLUS--->

    72274805.png

  9. Sorry for late reply. But your problem doesn't seem to be in the registry, so I think you need to check the files.

    If you still have the slipstreamed disc, try this in your command prompt:

    cd %YourDisc%\I386
    mkdir %TEMP%\extract
    for %i in (
    browseui.dl_ html.ie_ ieencode.dl_ iepeers.dl_ mshtml.dl_ mshtmled.dl_
    mstime.dl_ shdocvw.dl_ tdc.oc_ url.dl_ urlmon.dl_ wininet.dl_
    ) do expand -r %i %TEMP%\%extract
    explorer %TEMP%\extract

    Then, check if the file versions match the following:

    tdc.ocx - 1.3.0.3131
    html.iec and ieencode.dll - 2011.1.31.10
    All other files - 6.0.2900.6197

    If one of these doesn't match, then your KB2675157 wasn't integrated correctly.

    I don't have that disc. I've deleted it. But I'm working on a new one.

    As soon as I slipstream all hotfixes, I'll post results.

    Can you wrote those commands again? I can't read them properly.

    Step by step, cause I'm an id*** with command prompt and MS-DOS also. :whistle:

  10. First, Killjoy, you have integrated KB2492386, so feel free to delete KB955759.

    Second, KB961118 is a high-priority update but it's offered only after you installed .NET Framework. I should have told -X- about this (but he didn't add it to the list).

    Third, I cannot know why you can't integrate KB2675157. Could you please attach the nLite.in_ file in your i386 folder of your disc, so that I could look at the problem?

    So I have .NET 1.1 integrated into system and I can integrate 961118? OK, thanks.

    File nLite.in_ is in attach in RAR archive.

    NLITE.rar

  11. Not that that was the most polite way you could have asked for help, and assuming you are asking regarding XP SP3, which you didn't say, I believe the answer is both.

    From mimo's site http://mimo.zxq.net/updatelist.htm:

    The high-priority KB973687 replaces KB954459.

    The optional KB973685 replaces KB954430.

    Cheers and Regards

    I'm sorry I was in a hurry.

    Yes, it's XP SP3.

    Sooo.......both of them are OK for integration???

    THANK U. ;)

    Sorry again.

  12. My vote goes to Firefox.

    I've had some issues with passing from Firefox to Chrome.

    Anyway, when I was installing Chrome, he asks me to IMPORT Bookmarks, Passwords etc. from Firefox to Chrome. YES ofcourse.

    I've imported only BOOKMARKS and PASSWORDS, nothing more.

    Then........OMG! Chrome started to crashing every 5 seconds.

    Startup was so slow......every time.

    It seems that Chrome isn't optimized as well as Firefox. Firefox is fast as lighning without addons, plugins etc.

    But even with all of them, he is pretty fast, maybe not fast as Chrome (clean CHROME (no bookmarks etc.)).

    So, again, MY VOTE GOES to Firefox. ;)

  13. You didn't add them or something. Here are screenshots from my page.

    KB2675157.png

    flash.png

    Yes I did.

    For example, in your opinion, WINDOWS INSTALLER 4.5 and hotfix for Windows Installer (KB942288 v-3 and KB958655-v2) is NOT an "IMPORTANT" update for Windows???

    It is if you ask me.

    By the way, every time when I've slipstreamed AdobeAX from your page, IE asks me to update AX component. Why should I slipstreamed that update from your page if it is not working properly???

    By the way, 2564958 WAS NOT AVAILABLE that moment when I was starting to use your update page.

    What's wrong with optional updates???

    ROOT Certificats for example? Or AGAIN Windows Installer??? IT'S NOT IE or MESSENGER OK?

    Those are very important imho.

    KB971513 is an optional update. -X-'s page list only high-priority updates and that's why he never mentions the KB971513. Am I right?

    EDIT: One more thing.

    I get no such dialogs. He's adding who knows what and doing multiple nLite runs.

    For a few updates, you should expect to get those "file is not present in ISO to be updated" dialogs. Because these updates do contain files not present in the disc (for some reasons). Here they are:

    • KB2564958 (file: uiautomationcore.dll)
    • KB2603381 (file: customaddreg.dll)
    • KB2661637 (file: iacenc.dll)
    • Time zone updates such as KB2633952 (file: tzchange.dll)

    EDIT: Still another thing. I checked Killjoy's list of updates he integrated and I see no problem except 971513 and 955759. I have mentioned 971513 already, but for 955759, I think it could be removed as well. Because, the high-priority 955759 update can be replaced by the optional 2492386 and Killjoy have decided to integrate 2492386.

    Is it OK to leave them both on my list or should I delete 955759?

    @ -X- @

    If you are already updating your update page, you should definitely offer OPTIONAL UPDATES WITH High Priority.

    Not software as IE or WLM or PowerToys and things....or new calculator.

    What I want to do? I have Windows XP with SP3. With components: IE6, Movie Maker etc.

    I only want updates for them, for SYSTEM COMPONENTS and for system itself. NOTHING MORE.

    No new WMP 11 or IE8.

    Here is complete list of my updates. I've excluded AdobeAX.

    45575501.jpg

    92609307.jpg

    38464509.jpg

    IF you find solution to my problem, I'm gonna probably kiss your sweet as*!!! OK???

    Thank you all.

    Thank you all for wasting your time on me.

    Third time today........2675157 for IE is not integrated as it should be. He is not even in Add or Remove Progs under SOFTWARE UPDATES.

    By the way, I've looked at SVCPACK folder on ISO and it shows ONLY "CA_" type of file of 2675157.

    41642728.jpg

    It was all in one integration -X-. You've said that multiple nLite runs aren't OK.

    That reminds me. You've said that you are "provider" for only HIGH-PRIORITY updates.

    Why Microsoft reports me that KB961118 is available???

    01softwareoptional.jpg

    02highpriority.jpg

  14. No you are not following my package. If you did you wouldn't be having all these problems.

    971513? Where did you get that? What makes you think that needs to be added? Is that a SP2 or SP1 or SP0 update? My website covers Windows XP SP3 high-priority updates only! It's impossible to list everything that one MIGHT add? I'm not a mind reader. Just add what's on my page and you will be fine. Why do you feel the need to add more? They are not needed!

    Well, first time when I was using YOUR updates, 971513 was shown under WINDOWS UPDATES in IE.

    Here it is.

    16258494.jpg

    IE hotfix, obviously is not integrated as it should be.

    Also 923789 for Flash.

    WHY???? I don't know and I don't even care.

  15. I MUST put some hotfixes in separate folder because in you "package" you don't have all of them, only "high risk" hotfixes, for example 971513.

    You should check this out.

    Those dialogs are expected. nLite is simply complaining that either (1) the file in the patch is not present in the CD, or (2) the file in the CD is newer than the patch.

    EDIT: Wait a minute! Killjoy, you don't need the KB971513 as it was replaced by KB2564958. Remove KB971513 and you'll fix your problem.

    Really? I'll try. Tnx.

    I get no such dialogs. He's adding who knows what and doing multiple nLite runs.

    Oh yes! I've tried to do what you've said. Put all hotfixes together and try to integrate them all at once. About 30 errors poped-up.

    OK???

    I'm not doing anything special. Just trying to install all of them.

    Look -X-, I'm just following your package.

    How da hell should I know that 971513 is replaced by 2564958 IF you didn't wrote that on your "update" page???

    There are no traces of 971513 there.

  16. Here's your problem....

    svcpack.inf

    [setupHotfixesToRun]

    kb942288-v3.exe /q /n /z /o /b:sp3qfe

    kb971513.exe /q /n /z /o

    kb898461.exe /q /n /z /o

    KB973685.EXE /quiet

    kb2570947.exe /q /n /z /o /b:sp3gdr

    kb2603381.exe /q /n /z /o /b:sp3gdr

    kb2633952.exe /q /n /z /o

    kb2661637.exe /q /n /z /o /b:sp3gdr

    kb2647518.exe /q /n /z /o /b:sp3gdr

    directx32.exe

    WUA.exe /quiet /norestart

    AVC89.EXE -gm2 -ai

    AVC10.EXE -gm2 -ai

    There should be a kb2564958.exe /q /n /z /o line there along with the binary, KB2564958.exe, in the svcpack folder.

    Start over with a fresh copy of your XP source and do everything in one go and check that those 2 things are there.

    You already told me about that here.

    Fresh copy??? Where da hell should I find fresh copy of XP???

    I have XP with SP3. Only that. My original disk is destroyed long time ago.

    What do I have to do?

    Trying to find "PURE" XP online??? You must be joking.

    I'll try with the one I have.

    EDIT:

    Success!!! Only if I integrate that hotfix, not with the others, it's working. Installation grew 1,35MB.

    But IF I integrate along with the others, that little prick is making problems.

    STUPID Microsoft!!! Tnx man!

    EDIT:

    More problems on the way. Some hotfixes reporting something like "file is not present in ISO to be updated" etc.

    Before fixing the problem with KB2564958, I didn't have problems with other hotfixes.

    Btw, there are some conflicts between some hotfixes.

    I'll try again all over from the beggining and post problems in pictures.

    I MUST put some hotfixes in separate folder because in you "package" you don't have all of them, only "high risk" hotfixes, for example 971513.

    You should check this out.

    35812349.jpg

    85913771.jpg

    20749322.jpg

    36611039.jpg

    14181564.jpg

    43133071.jpg

    95418294.jpg

  17. You should be doing everything in one go. Except the SP. That can be done at the beginning by itself then save that as your clean source. Make a copy of it and work on the copy.

    You only need to integrate SP3 not 1, 2, and 3. SP3 has everything in 1 and 2.

    I have that Windows 9 years. SP2 was not available back than. So, I've slipstreamed Sp1, than Sp2 and in 2008 Sp3.

    Look in your i386 folder for a file named SVCPACK.IN_. Please attach it to your next post. Also look for uiautomationcore.dll, oleacc.dll and oleaccrc.dll in your i386 folder.

    All three files are in RAR.

    Download from here http://www.mediafire.com/?o554ki5v1ppad7k.

    By the way, I'm integrating files in 3 sessions.

    I've separated hotfixes on those with NON DIRECT integration and others. Only that.

    Dx, DotNET and others are also integrated after hotfixes.

  18. Does nLite report an error?

    Can you attach your last session.ini

    Download it again and replace the one you have been using. http://download.microsoft.com/download/7/9/A/79A50443-29E8-406C-BD1D-37E975BA3113/WindowsXP-KB2564958-X86-ENU.exe

    No errors reported.

    That one you gave me is identical with the one that I have. I've downloaded that hotfix at least 100 times.

    nLite says after integration: The installation grew 0,01MB.

    Right now, I'm going to install VirtualBOX and test that Windows.

    I'm slipstreaming these hotfixes, in 3 or 4 sessions.

    1nondirect.jpg

    2pack1g.jpg

    2pack2.jpg

    2pack3.jpg

    3dotnetdxc.jpg

    4ie8.jpg

    Btw, I'm using Windows XP SP3 clean for integration of hotfixes.

    At first, that was ONLY Windows XP.

    I've slipstreamed SP1, than SP2 and SP3 at the end.

    Last Session.ini

  19. What problem with the name?

    That update runs from svcpack so there should be an entry in add-remove programs when show updates is checked. Can you confirm?

    Also check for uiautomationcore.dll in system32

    You didn't understand. Using nLite, KB2564958 WON'T integrate into Windows at all.

    Every other hotfix from YOUR package is integrated, only that (KB2564958) is making problem.

×
×
  • Create New...