zorphnog Posted June 11, 2007 Share Posted June 11, 2007 Ok I have to say the documentation for the API is very poor. I'm trying to determine whether the WIM_MSG_ALIGNMENT message will allow you to reattempt the application of a file. Its not really clear what the alignment call allows you to do, but perhaps if you are able to send a -1 or something like that it would be able to go back to the file that failed.The other idea I have is to create a custom split function that would count the number of files in each .swm file before the WIM_MSG_SPLIT message is fired. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kickenchicken57 Posted June 11, 2007 Share Posted June 11, 2007 Turns out this is an issue that microsoft is aware about and I should be hearing back with some sort of solution. I have already created a cutom splitter to allow for different sizes (ex. 400mb on the first CD and 650 on the rest). I dont like the idea of counting the files within the splitter because applying the split files would rely on the custom splitter creating a file that says how many files each SWM holds. This means that split files created with imageX will not be compatible with the new applying program Plus, the WIM_MSG_SPLIT message provides no way of knowing how many files where processed in that swm. It is only fired when one part has been created and holds this info:wParam = (LPWSTR *) lplpszPartPath;lParam = (LARGE_INTEGER *) pliPartSize;Which does not help much. Hopefully I will hear back about this soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zorphnog Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 Well obviously there is someway to do it since the Vista installation can be split. Hopefully M$ will be forthcoming and timely in their response. Keep us posted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
p4ntb0y Posted June 12, 2007 Author Share Posted June 12, 2007 wow! you guys are making good progress sorry for my late delay!Anyhows I am at the state now of adding split wim support in my VB Imagex GUI and reading some of the posts it should be a bit easier to implement.As M$ can do it I am sure we should be able to do it. I will post the code here as soon as I have a solution as long as you like vb6 :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kickenchicken57 Posted June 14, 2007 Share Posted June 14, 2007 Bad news....Microsoft said to copy all of the split wims onto my target device and apply them from there. I am about finished with a utility that does the process automatically, but i would rather do it the right way, and apply directly from disk and wait between disks. Hopefully they release a solution in the near future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zorphnog Posted June 19, 2007 Share Posted June 19, 2007 What a bunch of crap. Looks like I'll be sticking with ghost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
p4ntb0y Posted June 20, 2007 Author Share Posted June 20, 2007 I beleive that M$ Copy each wim to a temp drive on the target machine.The trick here is to find out how to get the spilt wim info to find out the amount of cds required. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kickenchicken57 Posted July 18, 2007 Share Posted July 18, 2007 (edited) Here is another thing about ImageX for all of those who are interested:"Although the ImageX.exe tool may appear to be a mechanism to create an image of a computer for backup, there are several issues that prevent using the ImageX.exe tool as a supported backup mechanism.The following are the issues when you use the ImageX.exe tool as a backup mechanism: • Extended attributes are lost. • The ImageX.exe tool only applies reparse points that are symbolic links or junctions. • Sparse files on the system are captured and applied. However, the sparse files are no longer sparse after they have been applied. • Object IDs on files are lost in the capture process or in the apply process."You can read the full article here:http://support.microsoft.com/kb/935467EDIT:If anyone is interested in a method of scanning the hard drive for these NTFS features feel free to give me a PM Edited July 20, 2007 by kickenchicken57 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now