Jump to content

Recommended Posts


Posted
WinRAR imo..

Was that decision based on the popularity of the format? :rolleyes::)

I don't use WinACE myself now, but did find in a couple of tests in the past that it compressed a further 5-20mb than WinRAR, it varies depending on what you're compressing.

Posted

i use it because i find it compresses files a hell lot more smaller.. and because of the fact i got q3 dir which is over 400mg+ and rared it to around 90-150mb.. thats over 60% compression.. thats why :)

Posted
i use it because i find it compresses files a hell lot more smaller.. and because of the fact i got q3 dir which is over 400mg+ and rared it to around 90-150mb.. thats over 60% compression.. thats why :)

Same here, using WinRAR too, with my NTFS partitions. :rolleyes:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...