Jump to content

Windows 2000 question....


DarkCloud

Recommended Posts

Those looking for dual core processors should be considering what they do with their PCs - if you play games and do some word processing and email/net access, a dual processor box is an expense that is (at least for the most part) not justified. However, for those of us who run multiple VM's, compile, and use threaded applications, the more the merrier. Anyone who is a "power user" (not gamer, but power user) will tell you that a multiprocessor machine performs better under load than a single processor machine, at almost ANY task.

However, since both Intel and AMD have pretty much put the future in dual-core processors, you will see more threaded, multiprocessor aware applications within the next year or two. The MHz race has become the "more chips on one die" race, and it will be good for consumers in the long run :).

Edited by cluberti
Link to comment
Share on other sites


the more cores the merrie

actualy we allready have a winner, (IBM to be exact, (128 d(mm)x like cores, on a single chip).

its not realy blazingly fast clocked chip, but it can hendle just to many threads an once... (perfect voor rendering and probebly compiling as well).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...