Scubar Posted June 15, 2005 Posted June 15, 2005 (edited) i have just downloaded and tried out the new WinUHA RC1 to compare it against WinRAR and i am amazed at the results.56.1MB unpacked size WinRAR Maximum Compression 17.6MB totalWinUHA Maximum Compression 11.3MB totalneed i say morehttp://www.klaimsoft.com/winuha/might be useful as a good alternative if u really want to cram stuff in to small spaces Edited June 15, 2005 by ScubaSteve
mark strelecki Posted June 15, 2005 Posted June 15, 2005 I agree with ScubaSteve - WinUHA really shrinks stuff...But at what TIME cost? WinUHA is slower than WinRAR at both compression and decompression.I wonder if we'll see similar features in the next WinRAR, my archiver of choice (having switched from WinZip some time ago).ScubaSteve, please share your working times for the above ref'd process. Thanks for mentioning the latest and greatest archiving application here in the forums.
Scubar Posted June 15, 2005 Author Posted June 15, 2005 working times. this is using a PIII 450 so dont expect great results.the details in the first post are slightly off. here ar the correct ones,WinRAR Compressed 17.4MBCompression Time 2:43 secsDecompression Time 55 secsWinUHA Compressed 11.6MBCompression Time 12:35 secsDecompression Time 1:38 secs
spiritpyre Posted June 16, 2005 Posted June 16, 2005 seems interesting...if a little slow.btw what version of winrar were you using?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now