June 14, 200521 yr I think that I may have identified a bug. Consider the following code:selected.0.0=1description.0.0=Baseballhelptext.0.0=This will install the Baseball mouse cursor scheme.command.0.0=CMD.EXE /C %SCRIPTSDIR%\SYSTEM-MAININDEX.CMD %BASEDIR% selected.0.1=1description.0.1=Basketballhelptext.0.1=This will install the Basketball mouse cursor scheme.command.0.1=CMD.EXE /C %SCRIPTSDIR%\SYSTEM-MAININDEX.CMD %BASEDIR% selected.0.2=1description.0.2=Billardshelptext.0.2=This will install the Billards mouse cursor scheme.command.0.2=CMD.EXE /C %SCRIPTSDIR%\SYSTEM-MAININDEX.CMD %BASEDIR%If I remove .0.1 and do not renumber, then when WIHU is ran, .0.2 doesn't show up in the list. This seems to be pretty consistent across the board as far as numbering is concerned.
June 14, 200521 yr No this isn't a bug since each number have to be continuous numbered. If you remove .0.1 you have to fill the gap between the next entry.Recommended procedding:Deleting item 1.1 from ListBeforeExample:1 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3After deletingExample:1 1.0 1.2 1.3After adjustmentExample:1 1.0 1.2 1.1If I remove this restriction, it would mean that loading ini file would take very long (some seconds) because each level s recursively loaded. Edited June 14, 200521 yr by BenjaminKalytta
June 14, 200521 yr Changes in Version *.2: /HasGaps switch may be used to support ini files with uncontinuous keyword indizes. But, note, this will slow down ini file loading process.Benjamin Kalytta
Create an account or sign in to comment