I was trying to access my E drive from a remote PC using e$ yea I know security ant to good on my network

Well I could see some files and folders. If you typed the entire address it would still load the 'hidden' files

I have found a workaround

ping the computer to get its IP and type in the IP instead of the computer name

NS1 - Before

NS2 - After using IP and refreshed normal link

Has anyone else experienced this? Especially if you have use my WinNT Tweaker (Please state version) and/or RyanVM's update pack (State version)

I used a slightly modified WinNT Tweaker v1.1005 and also RVM Update Pack v1.2

Pretty sure it wasn’t doing this before Ryan's latest pack (v1.2)

Hey!

Same problem. Norwegian win xp pro, no ryanvm pack. When i browse \\computername\ it only shows some files, although the remote files are not hidden, its not visible.

Myabe its a regtweak causing this?

Myabe its a regtweak causing this?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I thought that too hence why my WinNT Tweaker has been taken off until I figure out what it is

I need to install this PC again with out the tweaks all the clients have been reinstalled its just the data server left now

I have reinstalled my data server now so will find out next time I try and browse my drives from a remote PC

Hi your problem is because of this update KB885250.

Just uninstall it and all will get back.

I had the same problem

http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?showtopic=39408&hl=

Hi your problem is because of this update KB885250.

Just uninstall it and all will get back.

I had the same problem

http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?showtopic=39408&hl=

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I have it installed and there’s no problem with it on my computer, just not using my tweaking app until I have updated it. It was installed using RyanVM Pack v1.2

Just adding last few things to the Engine side of things then I will get on with creating the tweaks list hopefully I will be able to generate it from a database instead of typing it all out. Next version will more than likely by hand coded and the version after that will hopefully be generated. Hand coding this one so I know what the compiler need to be capable of.

lolocite: do you mean that we should not integrate this hotfix, and remove it from the svcpack??

also what is this update?