Windows XP SP2 RTM Build 2153?

[codejunkie]

I downloaded the RTM but when I go into safe mode it thinks its build 2153? is this right? I redownloaded it from MS to make shore and still no change, some files are build 2180

but Safe mode still says 2153 whats going on? can someone help?

PS I have never downloaded version 2153!

[gamehead200]

That's weird... The build I have is 2180 and the timestamp is 21:58... Are you sure you're not confusing it with something else? Can we see a screenshot?

[schalti]

Version 5.1 (Build.2600.xpsp_sp2_rtm.040803-2158: Service Pack 2)

which means that it was built on August 3rd 2004 21:58

So 2158 is two minutes before ten o'clock in the evening, NOT Build 2158.

The Build is 2180, just take some DLL or EXE in %WINDIR% or in system32 and you will see.

[arablizzard2413]

oh he was looking in the wrong spot...yeah that's the build time, not the build number.

[codejunkie]

Microsoft ® Windows XP ® (Build 2600.xpsp2_sp2_rtm.040803-2153: Service Pack 2)

But regedit says otherwise, 2180 ?????

[Vann]

This has been discussed extensively already, in multiple threads, even. 2158 is the timestamp. Every SP2 final will display that. The actual version number is displayed when you right-click on ntoskrnl.exe and select "properties."

[codejunkie]

here is the info on the RTM file aswell, I deleted the old SP2 Beta files first too, its was slipsteamed with my WinXP SP1 CD (Original)

[jroc]

@codejunkie...why are you still posting....stuff...Your Question to you first post has been anwsered.....2158 is the time stamp...or in the future use the MD5 Hash Check.

[gamehead200]

Microsoft ® Windows XP ® (Build 2600.xpsp2_sp2_rtm.040803-2153: Service Pack 2)

But regedit says otherwise, 2180 ?????

It does not say 2153 as the timestamp, it says 2158... If it says RTM, then you have 2180.

[codejunkie]

Ok Sorry my fault, I miss read 2158 as 2153 and I thought the number at the end was the build number