i have a PHP-Nuke site up right now but im not sure if thats wut i should use. And i just wanted to ask the general question on who likes wut better.

I don't exactly see the point of the poll. Static vs Dynamic content?? Markup language (superseeded by xhtml ) vs embedded scripting language? It's comparing 2 quite different technologies... You use what you have to...

I'd use HTML for static content.. but I'd use ASP for dynamic (Since it's what I know) Both are good, for different reasons.. although, ultimately, PHP (and any other server side language pumps out HTML (or some other file type)

I use ASP and ASP.Net mostly in corporate environments (domains, with IIS as a webserver), but if it's for the www, and expenses out of your pocket, you'll find quickly than unix hosting with apache/php/mysql is MUCH cheaper than windows hosting (iis/asp/asp.net) with sql server. php is very capable as well.