Jump to content

Kelsenellenelvian

Patron
  • Posts

    9,018
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1
  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    United States

Posts posted by Kelsenellenelvian

  1. Do you actually belive the crap you spout?

    The people here, including me have well over thirty years of knowledge and practice. I started during the commodore 64 age. I have used and studied every version of windows released and some not released extensively. Telling someone they actually need sixteen gigs of page file is just pure BS.

    I agree that a tiny page file can be needed on rare occasion but any more if you have enough ran to actually need a 64 bit OS you're rarely going to touch any page file at all

    did u mean me ?

    if u set the pagefile to min and max its wont expand to full size till it used it all

    in server that might happened

    for client user, the most high i saw ~100mb used

    not you. That other guy I have seen bigger page files fill and never empty too.
  2. Letting windows waste upto sixteen gigs is bs. We've seen many times windows fill a page file and keep it full because it had always had issues cleaning it. That's a waste of space and resource.

    Have you come across this issue on Windows 10? You still appear to have a massive misunderstanding as to what the pagefile is and why it's needed. I really would encourage you to read the technet blog I linked to.

    While I study ten I refuse to use it. I won't give up my pc freedom and let MS rape my pc whenever they want. Plus I like a pc where I can actually work not just pretend to do serious computing

  3. Letting windows waste upto sixteen gigs is bs. We've seen many times windows fill a page file and keep it full because it had always had issues cleaning it. That's a waste of space and resource.

    Have you come across this issue on Windows 10? You still appear to have a massive misunderstanding as to what the pagefile is and why it's needed. I really would encourage you to read the technet blog I linked to.
    How about you find and read the in depth studies and practical tests several of us did here a decade ago regarding page files and the actual uses of then by the system? A page file (no matter how the system uses it) is hardly needed at all anymore with the amounts of ram a system comes with now a days.

    You have read allot but have you actually had any real practice? There have been systems run by senior members of this forum without page files for years. Get that? YEARS the page file is for the most part out dated and not needed.

    In essence a page file is only needed if the ram fills up. Some programs still use it to lessen the burden on the system but that's all

  4. Do you actually belive the crap you spout?

    The people here, including me have well over thirty years of knowledge and practice. I started during the commodore 64 age. I have used and studied every version of windows released and some not released extensively. Telling someone they actually need sixteen gigs of page file is just pure BS.

    I agree that a tiny page file can be needed on rare occasion but any more if you have enough ran to actually need a 64 bit OS you're rarely going to touch any page file at all

  5. Out of curiosity, how small of a size are you going for? Using an install.esd over an install.wim will save you ~1GB of space, and considering the unpacked install.wim/esd is ~19GB, that's a fairly substantial compression ratio.

    Around here allot of people aren't happy with that little he might want less than two gigs

  6. How about from already proven experience every for months when milestones are pushed it uninstalls programs for no real reason? When you give up something it makes it not free. Millions also gave up their very expensive windows seven licenses for this crap and millions more gave up their not so expensive windows eight licenses.

  7. It's been proven many times that a small minimum large maximum page file fragments the hard drive more, a static sized drive is the optimal choice as it doesn't fragment the drive.

  8. ^^ That's a good question. I'd be surprised if there were a contract or agreement somewhere between Microsoft and third-party software vendors, that gave Microsoft the right to uninstall third-party programs at will.

    --JorgeA

    Why would you be surprised? Do you think hardware manufacturers stopped providind Win9x/2000/XP drivers for newer hardware simply on a whim? They always are in agreement and they never care about the end user as long as they know there will be income.

    Microsoft has to go, forever. Or there will be no more computing for the average user.

    That's the rub here. Most of the reported apps that are being removed are free ones like cpu-z

×
×
  • Create New...