Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Donations


Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About maya77

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
  1. maya77


    Bravo Nuhi ljubi te daidža. Keep up the good work!
  2. I'm wondering why you would slipstream beta product into Windows installation? It expires in a few months. June 30 2010, I think. SP1 beta works fine for me. However there are no visual improvements, but we all know this is maintenance release. I'll wait for final to slipstream.
  3. 2010-08-19 20:00:34, Info CBS SPI: Starting SPInstall version 6.1.7601.16562 2010-08-19 20:00:35, Error CBS SPI: (CheckForPendingFlag:90)Failed to open component hive at C:\Windows\System32\config\components er=0x0 2010-08-19 20:00:35, Error CBS SPI: (SPIRegQueryDWORDValue:413)Failed to query registry value: ComponentsRemoved er=0x2 2010-08-19 20:00:35, Info CBS Self extracting header found. 54 files 2010-08-19 20:00:35, Info CBS Offset: 306924 Size: 593168 Name len: 13 Name: spinstall.exe CRC32
  4. Here are the lines which contains info about OS: BootDevice=\Device\HarddiskVolume2 BuildNumber=7600 BuildType=Multiprocessor Free Caption=Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate CodeSet=1252 CountryCode=1 CreationClassName=Win32_OperatingSystem Manufacturer=Microsoft Corporation MUILanguages={"en-US"} Name=Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate |C:\Windows|\Device\Harddisk1\Partition1 OperatingSystemSKU=1 OSArchitecture=64-bit OSLanguage=1033 OSProductSuite=256 OSType=18 Primary=TRUE ProductType=1 ServicePackMajorVersion=0 ServicePackMinorVersion=0 Status=OK SystemDevice=\Device\HarddiskVolume2 SystemDirectory=C:
  5. Won't install here: - I'm using Win7 Final - I've tried System Update Readiness Tool Any idea?
  6. Is it possible to remove "evaluation" desktop notice from XP x64. Is it possible to remove it in installation files? Thanks.
  7. http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?showtopic=53455
  8. Thanks to all for welcome me
  9. There is one color scheme. Not what I would call a tweak. Additionally I think, no one wants Gape to add tweaks to his pack because they like for what it is. A solid and (almost) complete update to 98SE. Well, they have a specific stickie thread each, in which you can post to ask your question. If you were posting at the right place I wouldn't be giving you my unwanted answers. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Your posts are not unwanted
  10. No it is not confusion... I know Win98 SE SP is legal but is not only bunch of updates. It contains some fine tweaks originally released for Win2000... Revolution Pack is also fine. The question was for both authors (author of Revolution pack and author of unofficial sp for Win98 SE) if they are plannig to make something similar for Windows 2000? Thanks for reply anyway
  11. Hi all Why you programers who is working on Win98 SE Service/Revolutions Packs doesn't make something like that for Windows 2000. It is very strong OS and you can make it better yet. You can improve it's look and functionality, make it closer to XP but faster and more stable than XP Windows 98 SE is history. You are doing great work, thanks!
  12. Hi all. This is very nice place. Hope I will be helpful member.
  • Create New...