Jump to content
Strawberry Orange Banana Lime Leaf Slate Sky Blueberry Grape Watermelon Chocolate Marble
Strawberry Orange Banana Lime Leaf Slate Sky Blueberry Grape Watermelon Chocolate Marble

MSFN is made available via donations, subscriptions and advertising revenue. The use of ad-blocking software hurts the site. Please disable ad-blocking software or set an exception for MSFN. Alternatively, register and become a site sponsor/subscriber and ads will be disabled automatically. 


rn10950

Member
  • Content Count

    254
  • Donations

    $0.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by rn10950


  1. Just now, cov3rt said:

    im curious to know if what this newer retrozilla 2.2 with tsl 1.2 version "20190223" has vs retrozilla 2.2 with tls 1.2 version "20180708". i currently have the version "20180708" that works in my windows 95 systems so i wanted to see if this newer version will work on windows 95 and what specific changes were made, because the change log makes it seem like it's the first version and i'm not seeing what really stands out as a major change. also i was wondering if it's better to use the .exe or zip version of the program, i just wanted to know what advantages or disadvantages there would be generally speaking, lastly, i was wondering if someone can explain to me why i can't download youtube videos from "https://youtubemp4.to" on retrozilla 2.2 with tls 1.2 20180708. it would be nice to be able to download videos in 720p hd that is offered from this site, but i've only got it to work properly on firefox 3.6.28 or newer ( i think that was the oldest web browser i tested for that youtube to mp4 site ).  

    This is my first release of RetroZilla 2.2, any other build is unofficial. This release, as with all RetroZilla releases, is tested on both Windows 95 and Windows NT 4.0. The changelog appears like it's the first release on the GitHub link because it is only showing the latest release. You can view all the releases, with their associated changelogs here, as well as about:changelog from within RetroZilla. The only differences between the exe and zip versions is the exe is a graphical installer. (i.e. installs into \Program Files, adds shortcuts, etc) Regarding youtubemp4.to, from what it looks like, the JavaScript code used is too new to work in RetroZilla at this time. It may work in a future release.

    • Like 1

  2. 2.2 is out!

    https://github.com/rn10950/RetroZilla/releases/tag/2.2

     

    Edit: It turns out that Github is refusing connections from RetroZilla 2.1, so it is impossible to download RetroZilla 2.2 using RetroZilla 2.1 (and I assume any official Mozilla release for 9x and NT4 as well as IE6). This issue will only affect 2.1 and below, as the security suite was updated in 2.2 (thanks @roytam1). I will look further to see if there is a way to access github using HTTP, or find an alternative host for the 2.2 binaries. There will be no way to change this in existing 2.1 installations, so consider the updater for 2.1 a notifier.

     

    Edit 2: Link that works in RetroZilla 2.1: http://www.filedropper.com/retrozilla-22en-uswin32installer

    • Like 3

  3. @roytam1 Do you have the complete source of NM28 online somewhere? I need to fix a problem specific to my CPU that is keeping me on 27. (For some reason NM28, or any 52.x-based browser for that matter, doesn't like my dual-Xeon setup too much.

    I tried git-applying the patches, but they don't want to apply.

     

    Quote

    C:/patches/cr-zlib.git.diff:704: trailing whitespace.
    #define inline
    C:/patches/cr-zlib.git.diff:3026: trailing whitespace.
        else
    error: patch failed: modules/zlib/src/ChangeLog:1
    error: modules/zlib/src/ChangeLog: patch does not apply
    error: patch failed: modules/zlib/src/ChangeLog.moz:63
    error: modules/zlib/src/ChangeLog.moz: patch does not apply
    error: patch failed: modules/zlib/src/README:1
    error: modules/zlib/src/README: patch does not apply
    error: patch failed: modules/zlib/src/adler32.c:1
    error: modules/zlib/src/adler32.c: patch does not apply
    error: patch failed: modules/zlib/src/compress.c:1
    error: modules/zlib/src/compress.c: patch does not apply
    error: patch failed: modules/zlib/src/crc32.c:1
    error: modules/zlib/src/crc32.c: patch does not apply
    error: patch failed: modules/zlib/src/deflate.c:1
    error: modules/zlib/src/deflate.c: patch does not apply
    error: patch failed: modules/zlib/src/deflate.h:1
    error: modules/zlib/src/deflate.h: patch does not apply
    error: patch failed: modules/zlib/src/gzguts.h:1
    error: modules/zlib/src/gzguts.h: patch does not apply
    error: patch failed: modules/zlib/src/gzlib.c:1
    error: modules/zlib/src/gzlib.c: patch does not apply
    error: patch failed: modules/zlib/src/gzread.c:1
    error: modules/zlib/src/gzread.c: patch does not apply
    error: patch failed: modules/zlib/src/gzwrite.c:1
    error: modules/zlib/src/gzwrite.c: patch does not apply
    error: patch failed: modules/zlib/src/infback.c:1
    error: modules/zlib/src/infback.c: patch does not apply
    error: patch failed: modules/zlib/src/inffast.c:1
    error: modules/zlib/src/inffast.c: patch does not apply
    error: patch failed: modules/zlib/src/inflate.c:1
    error: modules/zlib/src/inflate.c: patch does not apply
    error: patch failed: modules/zlib/src/inflate.h:1
    error: modules/zlib/src/inflate.h: patch does not apply
    error: patch failed: modules/zlib/src/inftrees.c:1
    error: modules/zlib/src/inftrees.c: patch does not apply
    error: patch failed: modules/zlib/src/mozzconf.h:44
    error: modules/zlib/src/mozzconf.h: patch does not apply
    error: patch failed: modules/zlib/src/trees.c:1
    error: modules/zlib/src/trees.c: patch does not apply
    error: patch failed: modules/zlib/src/uncompr.c:1
    error: modules/zlib/src/uncompr.c: patch does not apply
    error: patch failed: modules/zlib/src/zconf.h:1
    error: modules/zlib/src/zconf.h: patch does not apply
    error: patch failed: modules/zlib/src/zlib.h:1
    error: modules/zlib/src/zlib.h: patch does not apply
    error: patch failed: modules/zlib/src/zutil.c:1
    error: modules/zlib/src/zutil.c: patch does not apply
    error: patch failed: modules/zlib/src/zutil.h:1
    error: modules/zlib/src/zutil.h: patch does not apply

     


  4. @roytam1 Have you run into certificate issues?  I checked the Mozilla CA file in NSS and there are no root certificates in that file that are not in ours. I get this issue in both Win98 and my Win2k dev machine, both with BlackWingCat's root certificate update for 2018 installed. Do not have an XP+ machine with RZ to test on, but I don't think that will matter, as I have a semi-recent version of SeaMonkey working on Win2k with the updated kernel with no certificate issues.


  5. On 12/3/2017 at 6:43 PM, cc333 said:

    It's probably a longshot, but it might be worth trying to get Pale Moon to compile and run on 9x. This is most likely impossible, even with KernelEx, but some features and improvements could be backported to Retrozilla?

    Has anyone tried running that custom Pale Moon over on the XP forum with KEX?

     

    And yes, some of the changes could be backported. Right now, one of the major problems on RZ (at least in my experience using it while not developing it) is some security/cert issues. I have been getting errors and warnings a lot more lately, that's probably the next big thing to be fixed. I'm still thinking of the best way to do rendering. The Mozilla graphics rendering engine switched between 2.x and 3.x, so I have to think about how to go about it. CSS/HTML shims are a possibility going forward, as well as possibly including NoScript and enabling it by default.


  6. 21 hours ago, cc333 said:

    Is it faster and less clunky than modern Firefox on 2000? FF on 2k works okay for me, but it's slow and somewhat quirky (for example, bookmarking doesn't work). On the other hand, I've found recent versions of FF to be slow and somewhat quirky on modern, supposedly supported platforms as well, so maybe it doesn't matter anymore?

    c

    Not sure, didn't really test it that much as SeaMonkey is my default browser on that machine. However, on my high-powered XP machine, I did notice an improvement over Fx52 ESR. (This machine has 2x octa-core Xeons and 16 GB of RAM) I don't know if this benefit will be noticeable on more modest machines.

     

    19 hours ago, 98SE said:

    Can you try New Moon on Windows 2000 or 2000 SP4 minus BWC Extended Kernel?

    What computer system was this installed on?

    I don't have easy access to a vanilla 2k installation at the moment, but I assume that it wouldn't work. Pale Moon was forked from Gecko 38, which was a lot newer than native 2000 support. (The drop in support was due to a change in MSVC versions used to compile it) The BWC kernel adds a lot of functions and newer MSVC support.

     

    This 2000 installation was running on a Pentium 4 2.4GHz with 1GB of RAM. It is an upgraded Dell Dimension system, however I do not remember which one.


  7. 7 hours ago, roytam1 said:

    First BIG step of porting Firefox 3.6 to old NT.

    It runs but it cannot show any text.

    fx36-nt4.png

     

    for Firefox 3 or later not working (exit immediately) on NT4, the biggest reason is that, NT4 doesn't like "Local\" or "Global\" namespace/prefix in the Mutex.

     

    Test binary: http://roy.orz.hm/gpc/files1.rt/fx36vc71-20171014.7z

    Source: https://github.com/roytam1/fx36oldwin

    It's not working for me, it's complaining about GdiGradientFill in GDI32.DLL.


  8. 2.1 is out!

    I changed many of the default security popup dialogs ("you are entering/leaving a secure site") to be disabled by default, as most people consider them to be annoying, I disabled the sidebar opening every time you search from the urlbar, added the StartPage search engine (Google results without the tracking), added a few urlbar keywords to search easier, and added an update notification to the default home page.

    Any issues please let me know.

    Download RetroZilla 2.1


  9. A lot of progress is being made on the stopgap release before I get to updating Gecko. I am planning on dropping 2.1 within the next few days, possibly as early as tonight. Has a few improvements, especially in the realm of search and a few security-related prefs. These fixes are all already in the codebase, roytam1's patches will be applied to the next release, the reason behind this is to get another release out quicker and allow for more further testing and development of the patches. (I may apply those patches in a 2.2 release, or just hold off for 3.x, depending on how certain things go.)

    • Like 1

  10. Just tried it out and it's great, the native 64-bit version works and is fast, and it is extremely customizable. I found a Netscape 4/Mozilla Classic theme right away and installed TreeStyleTabs and it works just like my SeaMonkey install. (maybe once RetroZilla stabilizes a bit, I will work on a project that I will dub MoonSuite XP- an XP-compatible Pale Moon based SeaMonkey) Here's my setup if anyone's interested:

    29LAFqf.png

    • Like 1

  11. 25 minutes ago, roytam1 said:

    By my binaries or official rz2.0?
    I doesn't test my build on NT 3.51 yet.

    BTW I'm still trying to get fx3.6 build with VC2003(as my old effort some years ago, and now I pick it up again), and chromium ipc library hurts. :P

    The official source tree. If the tree built by VC6 works on NT3.51, we could try to backport the TLS patches to build on VC6 and add NT3.51 to the supported OS list.

×
×
  • Create New...