Jump to content

pallavsuri

Member
  • Posts

    94
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    India

Posts posted by pallavsuri

  1. hi guys ms released a new build of vista sp2 on 30th but its nowhere on the net. build number is 16497. installation is the same way. the same reg key tweak works.

    i also got the chance of installing windows 7 and had a few program compatibilty issues otherwise it had a lot of new customisation settings which is impressive.

    for now vista sp2 (16497) is performing a bit better than windows 7 on my machine.

    x

    ok tried with a fresh non vlite install the situation is the same. despite the registry update for sp2 windows update is showing that its upto date.

    ps: ive downloaded he 504 mb psf file and the installer for sp2 but no luck. anyone know what to do with these **** psf files??

  2. i too have the same setup - integrated sp3 image and use no cd (i use manual installation option within the nlited xpsp3 real installation) to install from one partition to another( i dont use daemon tools or ms virtual cd or any iso.... i just run the setup from the folder which nlite modifies). i face same problems.... start menu shortcuts are missing e.g. no wmp no ie no calc on the start menu, drivers are not integrated properly, unattend file doesnt work so on...

    also when i run manual setup with an answer file then why do i need to enter cd key etc?

    i hope there is a solution to this soon!! i hope nuhi is reading this !!

  3. haha there is no paranoia my friend nuhi...

    the product version shot is attached for your kind perusal as well

    good job with nlite/vlite

    despite the good intentions supporting 5503 is supporting piracy dear friend :) (no insults intended) :ph34r:

    catch you later :)

    post-121756-1205699531_thumb.jpg

  4. @nuhi my exact point why should anyone bother with "crafty Chinese and Russians resigned the changed SP3 which is actually a virus in some wonder land?"

    nothing personal or not even trying to insult anyone here but providing official support for pirated releases is supporting what?

  5. argument of being bored holds little water. there are sufficient commercial reasons to do that - bored or not.

    jumping the gun without any official confirmation is pretty strange - releasing 1.4.5 b2 is supporting piracy imho.

  6. well 3311 to 5503 for starters is a pretty big jump especially since there is nothing different compared to 3311 on the face of it.

    how difficult is it to hack/change build numbers anyway.

    insert some malware in 3311, bump up the build number and re-release it.

    who knows?

    the only reason for it to be legit is the new integration method needed.

    btw, offtopic sysinfo and ipconfig commands no longer work in command prompt... what component is responsible?

    thanks :)

×
×
  • Create New...