slipstream hotfix on top of update/addon packs?

[drixomanbeta]

Really silly question:

Is it okay to slipstream with nLite individual hotfixes (yes i know there're some exceptional hotfix that can't slip properly, what they are is a separate matter) after already applying a update packs from someone else? The pack I have is kind of outdated by months and there doesn't seem to be any new update for it coming in sight from the author (the packs is behind about 30 hotfixes).

I tried to let them install at T-13 but somewhere along the way some unreadable error occurred (I'm not using english so it came out garbled/boxed).

[Guest]

It depends on the update pack and whether you used nLite to slipstream it. nLite should not be used more than once on a given source.

[drixomanbeta]

Oh...I don't know if it helps but I use packs made by YumeYao, but s/he doesn't seem to be active lately.

And about nLite, I tried to order the hotfix to be below the updatepack but nLite seem to slip them first regardless.

[Guest]

Use RVMi to slipstream the update pack, then use nLite for the updates and everything else.

[drixomanbeta]

So does that mean it's okay to add regular hotfix onto packs; nLite shouldn't "break" anything RVMi done should it? I don't know if doing so would compromise any integrity prospect...

[Guest]

I can't say with certainty because I can't download his update packs from FileSonic and look for myself, but it's worth a try.