Jump to content

Integrated vs switchless ?


Patosan
 Share

Recommended Posts

This is probably a lame question but I'm curious about the meaning of "integrated" and "switchless" instals.

I've been experimenting with wmp11 slipstreamer and wmp11 integrator on my Japanese ver of XP. Slipstreamer didn't tell me of any problem, gave a smaller iso size than Integrator but failed at vpc test install. Integrator succeeded in vpc install yet produced a much larger iso size. I read somewhere that slipstreamer is a true integration of the wmp11 rather than a switchless (I think that's the term) of Intergrator.

So my guess is that :

a. Both systems will give identical os installs.

b. Integration replaces components rather than adding, thus smaller iso size.

Am I somewhere near the truth ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...