Jump to content

slayer1994

Member
  • Posts

    40
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    Italy

Posts posted by slayer1994

  1. 15 minutes ago, GianLuca18092004 said:

    What is that tool, what is it called? I have Dependency Walker but only to see what instructions and/or dll are missing

    You can find it in his site (see his profile). But it is not free...

    EDIT: By the way, I recommend you to wait because Blackwingcat always updates his kernelex.For example firefox 53+ doesn't work even with windows XP. If you want an up to date browser for windows 2000, you can use basilisk,k-meleon or palemoon. They work with Blackwingcat's kernelex. Roytam releases the binaries every week ;)

     

     

  2. 9 hours ago, sdfox7 said:

    Beta channel for Adobe Flash Player was updated to 30.0.0.142 on July 19, and is confirmed working on Windows 2000. 

    https://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer.html

    Mozilla Firefox (NPAPI):

    https://fpdownload.macromedia.com/pub/labs/flashruntimes/flashplayer/install_flash_player.exe

    Internet Explorer:

    https://fpdownload.macromedia.com/pub/labs/flashruntimes/flashplayer/install_flash_player_ax.exe

    Uninstaller:

    https://fpdownload.macromedia.com/pub/labs/flashruntimes/flashplayer/uninstall_flash_player.exe

    For best results, I recommend Windows 2000 Service Pack 4, the Windows 2000 Service Pack 4 Security Rollup Package (SRP), the Windows 2000 UURollup, and Internet Explorer 5.5 Service Pack 2.

    Many sites no longer work or are broken after upgrading to Internet Explorer 6 so I do not recommend it!

    Strange it still working with ie6 , i thought it was deprecated as browser.

  3. 3 minutes ago, cov3rt said:

    i'll pm you after this one last post if necessary as i needed to clarify one thing, there is no need for me to first install kernelex 4.5.2 ( main program with older files ) and replace the files with the one you mentioned, i just checked right now in the kernelex folder in the windows folder and it already has all the updates files listed in that separate update you listed, the difference being that they all become installed automatically without needing to manually do anything if using the ""KernelEx 4.5.2016.17" package which as indicated before is the full kernelex program with latest updates already included in it. 

    i can only confirm on these things, i have not tested actual functionality, i probably would need a different system or do a complete re-install of 98SE, possibly with ACPI disabled, without derailing too much from the post as it is indeed mainly for windows 2000, i will stop here and post further comments on the 98SE thread on backporting newer web browsers to 9x with kernelex, so please, if anyone has any updates to any of these related stuff, please post them there if using 9x systems. 

    Yes, try to do a clean installation and see if it will work. Hope you solve :)

  4. 6 minutes ago, siria said:

    No, please keep it public, other people have an interest too.
    Too bad KM74-goanna doesn't has its own topic, so it's now shattered across various others, very disorganised.
    Here's one especially for Win9x:
    https://msfn.org/board/topic/177485-backporting-newer-browsers-to-win9x-with-kernelex/

    Well, it is better to discuss in that topic for questions about windows 98 since this one is not the right section.

  5. 5 minutes ago, cov3rt said:

    can you please tell me what kernelex version you use / which one you downloaded, like i was pointing out earlier, it is confusing to find out which exact updates to use. i currently have a package on hold named "KernelEx 4.5.2016.17" which apparently is the latest kernelex and all previous updates all in one, and i also downloaded the package with the name of "KexBeta.17", the "KexBeta.17" package differs from the existing one in my archived contents in that it reads 4.5.2016.17 when you hover over the verify application file vs 4.5.2016.16 with the existing file i have in my archive but also the archived one i already have does not have "VKrnlEx.vxd" in the newer package and i think some different file names. 

    my bigger question is what is the purpose of the packages with verify in them if the "KernelEx 4.5.2016.17" is supposed to be a full package with all updates already in it? 

     

    I'm using this one, from the open post... Just replace them in the kernelex folder.

    https://msfn.org/board/applications/core/interface/file/attachment.php?id=41628

  6. 18 minutes ago, cov3rt said:

    hmm..., well i just tested k-meleon 74 with the goanna 2.2 web browser and it didn't work / launch on 98SE with kernelex 4.5.2 installed, mentioning failed to initialize. perhaps what you meant on k meleon working on windows 98SE with kernelex was the non goanna 2.2 combined browser / and / or an older version?

    You need to install the last kernelex from jumper,KernelEx 4.5 Core Updates and set compatibility to at least windows 2000 sp4

  7. 24 minutes ago, cov3rt said:

    i was wondering how that most recent updated test binary of k-meleon 74 you listed compares with firefox 31.8.0 esr, more specfically for youtube as another forum member posted saying youtube worked on that k-meleon 74 version you listed but on windows me? i noticed just recently that apparently not all videos will play on windows 2000 with the extended kernel using firefox 31.8.0 esr, it mentions a html5 related error, i only tried two videos, one displayed the error message and the other didn't and played fine. 

    i was wondering if that k-meleon browser would work on windows 98SE with kernelex? it would be nice to use that k-meleon browser on windows 2000 if it doesn't require the extended kernel, that way, one can substitute the extra space for other official updates such as in my case of having all contents a bit less than 670 MB after burning on a cd, i realized the only program i only really needed more modern from the extended kernel for windows 2000 was the web browser firefox 31.8.0 esr, i don't think i needed anything else per say. 

    Yes, that version doesn't require kernelex on windows 2000, it works also with vanilla one... As for windows 98, it requires the kernelex to work.

    EDIT: Also, HTML5 videos will work fine.

  8. On 7/18/2018 at 11:06 PM, dencorso said:

    Try just this from a dos box before anything. I've used it many times in the past. It just works.

    %systemroot%\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319\ngen.exe executequeueditems

    Thanks, I had the same problem, and it works in this way.

  9. 7 minutes ago, jaclaz said:

    It is a very definite "niche", namely only tablets or tablets like devices with less than 4 GB RAM.

    As an example, I do have an el cheapo (but honestly not too shabby) Chuwi Hi8 Pro tablet that dual boots Windows 10 and Android that is 32-bit UEFI.

    jaclaz

    Yeah, I have a similar tablet and I wish I could install a Windows x64 system... The x86 systems will be become more and more useless since developers nowdays are developing only x64 applications. It is still possible to install a x64 system and it is linux with a modified bootia32.efi.

×
×
  • Create New...