assasing123

Off, i use other OLD system integrity control app that gives me much more power than UAC, anyway i have never been infected by a virus, that only happens to idiotic users that are careless or ignorant. and some people that just dosn't takes enought care sometimes. oh well my OCD makes me not miss anything what happens on my PC so meh... >_>

I will just say one thing that HAS always annoyed me about OS specially. when they say they both faster, they should mean they both faster in the same hardware, otherwise you can't really say they aren't bloated or such. sure windows 7 boots faster than windows XP, as long you are running on quad core with some insane video card. but then try this i can boot windows XP on a pentium MMX (YES A MMX!!!) at 200 Mhz, try to even install windows 7 there and then if you succed (which i doubt) try to boot it. if it was instalable it would take about 1 month to finish booting. for what? the very same functions windows XP does, there IS NOTHING! i can't do in XP i can't do in 7. search? ever hear of windows search? is on the taskbar and is in fact even easier and faster to access than the menu one of windows 7, eye candy? windows blinds. makes it work faster in fact and look even cooler. rolling menus? O.o i honestly don't use this crap at all, i use win + r most of time however when i need something from the menu because i don't remember the name i often find myself more confused on the windows 7 than windows XP, sure hierarchical mode is like a diagram but you aren't takking onto the accoutn that in fact windows 7 is using it too, just with a different look. when you click start menu u could call that, ROOT. then you go into all programs under start menu, then you see a lot of folders and then inside those folders the files or exes just exactly like in windows XP, advantage of windows XP though is that you can see who the parent is easily, as you surf on windows 7 you keep getting more and more lost since you don't know where exactly are you, also to whoever said the menu dosn't has autorganize, maybe u could go back to even windows 98 and try right clicking on the start menu, there is something called AUTOARRANGE. ok, now, windows 7 measures how much... oh right over 8 gigs on my hard disk, while XP measures 2, and win 2000 and 98 under 1 and half gig. what i use my computer for? 3D modelling, programmation, accounting, active directory when using server versions. etc etc etc, fact. i can do ALL of this EXACTLY equally on windows 98 and windows 7? so where is the sooo called productivity gain on the OS? for what it matters i ONLY upgraded OSes due to hardware support, because MS forced people to change OS and so people stop making drivers for the previous oses. hell the candy stuff REALLY p***es me off but i have seen a windows vista theme on windows 98 even and the application for it MEASUREd 5 MEGABYTES. not the half gig code windows 7 or vista use for that. directx 10? i have it on windows XP with just a simple hack, how? simple, microsoft just lied about it being impossible in windows XP, just with a few bytes of code you can add it, alpha blending? they said it was impossible too, yet windows blinds people (stardock) added it on winXp without any issue, (oh did i mention windows blinds only measures about 80 MB installed) and all the eye candy of windows vista and more. aero peek? the application to do that in windows XP measures barely 1 megabyte, same for image preview. and taskswitch does a far better job than that stupid cool looking thing of windows vista. security? why the hell corporative users have online access anyway, they are supposed to be WORKING!! NOT surfing on internet. and even if they do, safety can be handled by ANY third party program. not like it matters, hackers always find a way to bypass AVs and etc, i myself have seen a PC with avira, kaspersky, nod, ese all full 100% updated, totally dead from a virus, how it got there, no one knows. is due to all this that i have been working trying to make a stripped version of XP that can do ANything the user wants without problems but that has no stupid useless stuff on it. so far i have stripped like 200 MB of stuff and optimized the file system for multiple partitions (coz yes yo ucan mode system folders to other places like in windows vista, just use folder redirector or the register) sooo ugh... stop praising people for making s***ty stuff, BOTH! windows, mac and linux all suck EXACTLY equally. YOU KNOW WHAT!? i m going back to paper if the current trend of idioticing Oses continue. well... now that i ranted a little ill go finish fighting with some OCS 2007 server at my side.... interesting enought i just found an app of 6 MB that has ALL the features and a setup that takes 4 mins that does ALL this 600 MB server s*** does, and oh right it only needs 1 PC not 4 servers like this OCS... ugh ... not a good day..

Jrosen you didn't read the first psot did you? that was stated is not what i need already, i do know that explot and method, but what i want is to deleted all the accoutns and make the system have ONLY that, system account, sort of like minlogon wihtout adding any extra aplication, and after that ill try to see how much can i strip from the system, when you do the method you said, you are in fact logged on the admin accoutn still, you can notice that from the fact if you press ctrl+alt+supr the task manager that opens is under teh admin control and not a system taskmgr process.

No is not commands but rather full access to any resource, process, file, also to DELETE and remove any trace of any other kind of system user leaving the system on an usable state ALIKE that of old fat based windows where the user had 100% control, i know is a safety suicide, but i m not looking for safety but more alike trying to strip windows XP slowly, i have already removed or modified some services, deleted LOTS of files, redirected system reg keys adn files attempting to make something alike a dedicated operative system (like that of the old Xbox and even simpler if possible) that only purpose is to run apllications while wasting the less possible resources Memory and procesor wise.

Allthough the IT method works, it dosn't removes the bytes still of the other accounts and register bounds. easy to notice since if you use ctrl+alt+supr you get a task manager that belongs to the user that logged in originally and not to the system, to run the taskmgr from the system user is needed to type it as a command on the command pront or run box

The reason is simple, i m often messing up with memory dumps and other stuff that i link to process run by system (and yes i crash my PC very often). also because i want to create a really totally stripped version of XP not for normal users though. but something where every single cycle of the procesor and every byte of ram and hard disk is not being wasted on stuff. sort of like a pure kernel + drivers + gui, nothing else. alike a game console you could say. i m not asking for if should or not. neither i m asking what would be the consequences, i m aware of those. so please avoid posting those things. also as the minwin guy said, MS did it for minwin so there should be a way to do this on XP. and yes i m running SP3 Pro. so if anyone knows how to do what i want, mind illuminating me?

so i m sure many of you have hear of the privilege scalation process that allows users to use the computer as the "SYSTEM" user right? well i m trying to make the PC use that user by default and not have any other user except those strictly needed (so yeah deleting administrator even) but i m not sure of where to start first. i do know in OLD Oses like Windows 98 since there was no such thing as system user or limited users you were always running actually as the "SYSTEM" equivalent so i want to do that with my windows XP as well to disable or get rid of any other part of the OS that might link to other users. any suggestion or idea?. First problem = if i open the control panel and try to edit my account while logged as "SYSTEM" either: A: if using normal control panel i get the choice to change my picture if i click that i will get a NULL error. or B: using clasic control panel when i click on user accounts i can't see myself (sorta obvius) but i do know it might be modificable trought the command pront since the shell and other parts must have locked access and disabled the posibility to modify this account. if there is any GURU out there, now is the time to appear.

I know i m quite the forum lurker but... i have been wondering is tehre any workaround to install IE7 or 8 in a win2000 OS? if anyone can sort it out please tell me >,<

I love you guys you know, i have always wanted to give 98 all this sort of features and updates and make it more compatible, sweet would be to get the source but we all know MS won't do that for us >_> I installed the win98upg that says i can use firefox3 but i don't know how to install it, each time i try to run the installer it detects this is win98se and don't allows me to continue and i was wondering how could i make the win xp fax and picture viewer to work here. i m running XP, Win98Se and a beta of windows 7 on this Pc, but my fav is always 98 ... u know Dune 2 with good sound... and the speed for some stuff... i would appreciate a lot if i can get help on this and x3 i will try to give help myself once i find what i can do o.o WIN 98 FTW.