Jump to content

portkaku

Member
  • Posts

    1
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    Australia

About portkaku

portkaku's Achievements

0

Reputation

  1. I don't think having the smallest XP is stupid. Of course the smallest xp represents less functionality. Just a point here: mojopac is small but works well, so why not have a small XP and run it trough ramdrive using the QEmu Emulator (I'm always running DamnSmallLinux ISO Image with Qemu in my Windows XP computer at work, because i don't have Adm. Permissions). We have to separate 2 diferent situations and be clear/aware of them: 1. Install XP under a pendrive and Boot XP though pendrive: this could be a full xp with ALL functionality that you want. 2. Have a Small XP (very small, less than 30 Mb) and run it with QEmu in RamDrive (Virtual ISO Image): very small functinality but the users are aware of that and accept this condition. The users wants this XP_RamDrive just to surf the net under a secure connection (no virusses), download/sync the outlook messages, run some small aplications and nothing much more than that. But nevertheless, is very interesting to have this ability. That's why mojopac (ringcube inc.) is team up with microsoft. It would be interesting try to discover what components, drivers, etc, etc does mojopac have, so we could duplicate it with a nBuilt/XPLite xp version. This would be an interesting project. Or we could even do better and build a better small XP. I think that a Small XP needs to have no more than 30MB so it can run in 256MB Ram computers (I've seen the post of 16MB in 911cd, but I'm really lost). So what can we remove?? What is really necessary to have?
×
×
  • Create New...