dONALDBlood

Isn't it possible with the script (awesome btw) to merge all the three .NET packages? And btw isn't it interresting, that one can not slipstream all the needed stuff (directx + ie7 + wmp11 + windows installer 3.1v2) using only ONE method? I mean i DO highly respect all the hard work of the authors of HFSLIP and nLite, but for xmpl: HFSLIP wont slipstream ie7 for me (i was just trying to do it, as it was described on hfslip.org, so no really point to argue), but do slipstream directx, msi installer, and wmp11. nLite slipstreams ie7 and wmp11, but not msi installer... Sometimes i think it would be awesome, if there would be a method to slipstream all the needed stuff... I mean one method for all... P.S.: sorry for my bad english, i'm from the *ss of middle-europe

Because why use nLite, when I can make things myself... in a CONTROLLED way, where i can see, what exactly changing and executing...

can't dl it, not found on server... what now?

I simply renamed the .exe, after i killed it through TaskManager of chourse... NEVER came back :-)

I wan to do this: I wan to have admin user shell folder 'Temporary Internet Files' in %SYSTEMDRIVE%, not in those s***ty profile's dir... PLS HELP ME! :-(

Hi, I'm new here. I'm confused about the slipstreaming proces, i got a problem. I used the 'batch-slipstreaming' method. Everything vent well, but... 1. Every slipstreamed hotfix was copied into the i386\svcpack dir during the process (there are the .cat files too) 2. There is a svcpack.inf created in the i386 folder, in my unattended installation. Can i delete the copied hotfixes and the svcpack.inf from my install? If those are slipstreamed, there is no need to be there, right? Again, i want them to be slipstreamed, not use the svcpack method, and i did so too (dowloaded the bath file from msfn unattended page), but the svcpack.inf was created, and the hotfixes are copied. So I'm confused, the integration process went well, or not?