Jump to content

lgodfrey

Member
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    United States

About lgodfrey

lgodfrey's Achievements

0

Reputation

  1. here's the solution: (you have to use the advanced option, which will not show up if you have already tried to change the file association, in which case you have to reset the file association and then do the following. Thanks to Dan Battagin of Microsoft. 1. Open up My Computer 2. Choose Tools | Folder Options > File Types 3. Find XLS and click Advanced 4. Click Open, and choose Edit... 5. Change the settings to be as shown below a. Application used to perform action: Change to point to Office11\Excel.exe, and put double quotes around the %1 b. DDE Message: delete the value there 6. Click OK out of all of the dialogs You should now be good to go - XLS will open in XL2003, and everything else will still use XL2007 Cheers, Dan
  2. I've loaded 2007 beta 2 onto my wxp, all updates, machine. office 2003 is still on my machine too. If I double click a file that explorer recognizes as a 2003 file, it will open up in 2007. I would like to have my old xl files open with old xl, and only those create/saved as 2007 files open with 2007 can't seem to make this happen with explorer/tools/folder options/file types/opens with: propery. My workaround is to open 2003 first, then double click on the file (or use 2003 file open of course), but this is much slower than doing a dbl click. any suggestions? Regards Larry
  3. I was so looking forward to some speed enhancements in my Excel applications and vba code with the 2007 beta, but I am terribly dissapointed in the results. Like many posts here and on many other forums where Excel 2007 beta is described as slow, I experience major hits on recalculation speed, and chart redraws. I have spent months optimizing my spreadsheet for speed in 2003, and have a reasonable PC (2gig ram, 3 ghz intel processor) with WXP, all recent updates. I thought I would get specific on speed hits. IN 2003, on line graph with 50 K data points takes 2-3 sec to redraw on my machine. The same graph, once its spreadsheet is pulled into 2007 beta and saved as an xlsm file, takes one minute to redraw. thats a 30X hit in speed. I have other graphs that take 10-20 seconds to redraw in 2003, but in 2007 beta, after 5 minutes, I just terminated it with task manager. I also ran some cell calculation speed tests. One row of my spreadsheet takes an average of 1.3msec to calculate for 100 recalculations (determined using vba and a high precision timer add in). The same row in 2007 beta takes 19.5 msec, thats a 11.5X hit. The only time I see improvement in speed 2007 beta/2003 is when the workbook has no large number of data points on graphs and 2003 dependency limit is exceeded so it has to do a complete recalc if one cell is changed. But even when the dependency limit is exceeded, if you use vba to only recalc cells you know need updating, you can experience a 10x slowdown in 2007 beta. The two typical responses to reports of slow 2007 beta seem to be (to paraphrase) "are you sure your machine is up to it? and "don't worry, its only a beta and speed tweaking isn't finished." In response to the first, one poster said "if my 3ghz, 2gig ram machine can't handle it, what can?") And the calculation hits are so big that even going to a state off the art mulitprocessor dual machine at higher clock speeds and setting 2007 to allow more multithreads cannot make up for them. re the release will be faster after tweaking, its hard to imagine how some last minute tweaking can overcome the speed hits I have measured. I think it is time for a real look at calculation speed and graph redraw speeds by the experts. If the findings of others and myself do not get "unvalidated" by expert level review and puplication of relative speeds, it is clear to me that Excel 2007 beta is totally useless for large graphs as well as for calculation time critical applications, and that with factors of 10X slower, will remain so for the final release. I hope I am wrong since I would love to be able to use the expanded capability of 2007....can someone demonstrate that I am wrong? best regards Larry
×
×
  • Create New...