Trolleri
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Trolleri
-
-
CheckUdisk reports this info about my DataTraveler 2.0:
Name: DataTraveler 2.0 (USB2.0)
Logic Driver: E:\
VID&PID: Vid_0930&Pid_6545
Speed: high speed
VendorID: Kingston
ProductID: DataTraveler 2.0
Product Revision: PMAP
Vendor Description: Kingston
Product Description: DataTraveler 2.0
Serial Number: 001D92AD6B725B8A0B060BFFA search for PID 0930 on flashboot.ru gives me several options:
HP USB Disk Storage Format Tool 2.1.8 Rev. A (SP27608)
Phison PS2233 v1.03.00 (PS2233, UP14-UP16)
Phison ps2233-ps2237 v1.11
0 -
You may try accessing it with the PHISON utilities:
This is the info I get from the tool Phison_PS2233-PS2237_v1.11\ MP2233_F1_B4_V111_00.exe :
Processed:
E:
====VED/PID=======================
VED(0x0930), PID(0x6545)
====SCSI Inquiry Information======
Manufacturer ID: Kingston
Product ID: DataTraveler 2.0
Inquiry Revision: PMAP
====USB Informations==============
Manutacturer: Kingston
Product: Datatraveler 2.0
S/N: 001D92AD6B725B8A0B060BFF
====Firmware Information==========
Mode: 8
FCI:FC2 = FF : 01
MP ver: 225.04.00And I still get this info from ChipGenious (Now with Chip Database Rev. 2009-10-07):
Device Name: +[E:](Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 USB Device)
PnP Device ID: VID = 8086 PID = 27CB
Serial Number: 3&&33FD14CA&&0&&EB
Revision: /PMAP
Device Type: Generic USB Host Controller - USB2.0 Full-Speed (USB1.1)
Chip Vendor: (No match record)
Chip Part-Number: (No match record)
Product Vendor: Kingston
Product Model: DataTraveler 2.0
Tools on Web: (N/A)I am confused
0 -
Well, this USB has been tooled with a bit. I have tried both BootIt v1.07, and vers. 0.2.2 af WinSetupFromUSB with GUI. But after another clean format in windows 7, to get one partition FAT32, i still get the same info from ChipGenius. Is there any way I could have tooled the VID and PID to be something false from the factory settings?
I cannot remember from where this particular key was bought, but on the side it says:
DTI / 4GB
CH 102308
05381-015.A00LF
5V
China
0 -
I have been searching like a mad dog on both google and flashboot.ru, but apparently there are none Manufacturer's Tool for my USB-stickIf you cannot find anything, post PID & VID and any relevant info Chipgenius finds and I'll try and help you in finding the appropriate Manufacturer's Tool.The latest info I got from ChipGenius v3.00 with Chip Database Rev. 2009-09-26:
Device Name: +[E:](Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 USB Device)
PnP Device ID: VID = 8086 PID = 27CB
Serial Number: 3&&33FD14CA&&0&&EB
Revision: /PMAP
Device Type: Generic USB Host Controller - USB2.0 Full-Speed (USB1.1)
Chip Vendor: (No match record)
Chip Part-Number: (No match record)
Product Vendor: Kingston
Product Model: DataTraveler 2.0
Tools on Web: (N/A)Thanks in advance for any help given!
And if it helps; Windows 7 recognize the key as "Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 USB Device", and it is 3,77 GB formatted as FAT32.
0 -
Typo corrected...
0 -
What is the status on the test release hfslip_beta_Jun6, has it reached a level of completion?
It seems that IE8 can be fully integrated, and also the newest updates from WU - or how is it now?
0 -
Does HFSLIP v1.7.8 still work with the newest updates listet on the list, i.e. IE8, or should I use the beta-version?
To improve the GUI-experience, the following feature could be added, to avoid questions as the one I just gave you:
Get HFSLIP to check two online RSS-files - one file with the current hotfix list, and one with the deprecated hotfixes. Then HFSLIP automatically check the subdirectories for hotfixes that the user intends to slipstream, and report if any updates are not included, and also report if deprecated ones are present. Just remember to include an option to skip the proces, if you want a specialized version to slipstream, and everybody will be happy
0 -
Maybe it's because of firefox is not installed (but would be really strange), download page states the .NET assistant addon should be active in firefox for the hotfix install to be effective, and if not, reinstall should be done for the addon uninstall button to appear. I think langpacks has nothing to do with all this.
Yes I saw your editing of #1, but it is very strange I still get the update on MU.
I read the instructions on how to manually remove the .NET Framework Assistant for Firefox. Then I opened regedit, and browsed to:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Mozilla\Firefox\Extensions
The funny thing is, that I have that key to begin with...
I do not have the subkey {20a82645-c095-46ed-80e3-08825760534b}, but this REG_EXPAND_SZ -value:
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Mozilla\Firefox\extensions]
"jqs@sun.com"=hex(2):43,00,3a,00,5c,00,50,00,72,00,6f,00,67,00,72,00,61,00,6d,\
00,6d,00,65,00,72,00,5c,00,4a,00,61,00,76,00,61,00,5c,00,6a,00,72,00,65,00,\
36,00,5c,00,6c,00,69,00,62,00,5c,00,64,00,65,00,70,00,6c,00,6f,00,79,00,5c,\
00,6a,00,71,00,73,00,5c,00,66,00,66,00,00,00The hex translates to "C:\Programmer\Java\jre6\lib\deploy\jqs\ff"
The key and the value have probably been created by a Java Installer. Then MU might detect the Firefox\Extensions -key in my registry, and wants to install the hotfix KB963707 on my Pc - who knows
Now I will try to remove the key, along with the .NET Framework extension files stated on the MS support-page. Rebooting....
Edit:
After rebooting this Pc, Microsoft Update still wants to install the update KB963707, but failing to do so. It is strange, but I am now beginning to feel like it doesn't matter for me.
0 -
Nevermind
I do not even have Firefox installed - but stupid MU still annoy me with this update.
0 -
I could get KB963707 installed though ms update without problems, i.e. using a 3.5 SP1 SNMsynth installer without KB963707 applied. Are you using maybe 3.5 SP0?
No I haven't used SP0 since SP1 got released, and this is first time, I have run into problems. My testing system is however my primary Pc, and is has a lot of programs and hotfixes installed through WU/MU and the web.
Later I will try to install KB963707 after a clean install of the Danish Silent Net Maker Synthesized packages on a clean Danish XP SP3 system, but since my primary Pc is also my only Pc at the moment, I need to wait until I get the time (and Pc) to do the testing.
Sounds promising, that your script is working with the Spanish packages
0 -
I did install my system with packages made by the latest version of batch, but now this new update, KB963707, cannot get installed on my system the normal way through Windows Update.
Are the installations of .NET packages, made by this batch not pure? Or does anybody experience the same thing, when installing everything the normal way?
0 -
In post #1 you ask for feedback - I LIKE YOUR BATCH
I went on Microsoft Update just now, and there was a new hotfix. In Danish it says:
It fixes some compability issues with Firefox.
Can it be included in the silent net maker?
We have great weather in Denmark, and today we did celebrate midsummer by having bonfire all over the country
0 -
Hi
My project is to make a USB flash stick with the following multiple boot options:
1) Windows XP (I have already an unattended version as *.iso intended for CD)
2) Ultimate Boot CD V5.0b12 (ubcd50b12.iso)
3) BackTrack v3 (bt3final_usb.iso)
Since the Windows install is slow on FAT partitions compared to a partition with NTFS, and BackTrack needs to be on a FAT partition, a smart solution could be to split the drive in two partitions - just as ilko_t suggested in this post.
The solution could be:
First partition with NTFS contains Windows XP install files, and UBCD
Second partition with FAT32 contains BackTrack
So does anybody know how to create more partitions on a USB flash stick?
A normal stick contains only one partition, and Windows XP does not support more than that.
The dangerous tool BootIt v1.07 does not work on my USB stick (4 GB Kingston DataTraveler 2.0). The fact that the tool reports my sticks capacity as -221 MB, also indicates no support for my USB stick.
Thanks
0 -
Well that pretty much sums it up - I didn't even know about Hiren's
I tested my USB stick, and UBCD is now my new favourite tool beside of reinstall - thx again
0 -
Haha, yes that it very simple enough - even for me
And thx for your quick replies, you take this work seriously - I respect that
... enough of that...
Is it also possible to do the excact same thing with Hiren's Boot CD 9.9?
0 -
Hi
The tool WinSetupFromUSB GUI is an fantastic tool, but I really need instructions on how to include Ultimate Boot CD V5.0b12.
Will I get the following multiple boot-options on my USB stick?:
1) Windows XP (I have already an unattended version as *.iso intended for CD)
2) Ultimate Boot CD V5.0b12 (ubcd50b12.iso)
I am interested in this, because I would like to have several rescue meassures on a single USB flash stick.
0 -
Can this new version of WinSetupFromUSB create multiple boot with the following three boot options?:
Windows XP Pro with drivers from driverpacks.net already slipstreamed
BackTracker v3 from remote-exploit.org (bt3-final.iso or should I use bt3final_usb.iso?)
Ultimate Boot CD v4.1.1 from ultimatebootcd.com (ubcd411.iso)
If so, how do I include all of them on my USB with your awesome tool?
Thanks
0 -
Thanks....
0 -
What file could not be found? Is it the file 7za.exe?... during the creation it gave an error saying that a file could not be found ...If it is, then you have to download Tomcat76's original script: http://users.telenet.be/tc76/pool/20080603/SNM.zip
Unzip it to the same folder as the one you have all the other files in, and run strel's SNM_mod5.cmd again. Strel decided not to include this file in his package, but as far as I know, you will need it together with all the other files in SNM_mod5.zip.
When I use this script for creating the danish DNF_full.exe, I run SNM_mod5.cmd, with these files in the folder:
7za.exe
7zSD.sfx
dotnetfx.exe
dotnetfx35.exe
dotnetfx35langpack_x86da.exe
langpack.exe
NDP1.1sp1-KB867460-X86.exe
NDP1.1sp1-KB928366-X86.exe
SNM_mod5.cmd
_SNM.ini (modified to MERGE_FRAMEWORKS=FULL)
And it gave me: DNF_all.exe (55,3 MB)
This danish version works with all versions and languagepacks installed correctly under Add / Remove Programs - even the languagepack for 3.5 gets installed correctly.
It might have been my fault, that you are confused... I tested the installer on my desktop to test it and it installed no problem at all except it did not install v1.0 + service packs ... You will not see 1.0 in Add / Remove Programs, but you should see 1.1.
Sorry, but I will not take credit for this script - thank Tomcat76 for it, and strel for the recent modification. But I hope my reply will help you with their awesome script!... Anyway i hope you can help me on this one and thank you so much for your hard work in the creation of this wonderful script! ...0 -
I'm sure this was asked and answered, but I couldn't find it in the thread...
Why does this integrate .NET 2.0, 3.0, and 3.5? 3.0 and 3.5 are backwards compatible to 2.0. There's no point in installing 2.0 or 3.0 if the system is also going to have 3.5.
3.5 is backwards compatible because it has 2.0 and 3.0 included in the installer, hence the download of 3.5 installer only, and not 2.0 and 3.0 installers. This batch separates the versions for easier implementation, but you need 3.0 to install 3.5, and 2.0 to install 3.0. Read the notes in post 1.
Now, .NET 1.x is another beast entirely. This version is completely incompatible. I can understand wanting 1.x and 3.5 to install, but 2.0 and 3.0 are completely redundant.1.1 is clever to include, since it has important security fixes for the 1.0-version installed in XP already. Just remember to install this “beast” last, and you won’t have any problems.
The install order is simply (read the notes in post 1):
2.0 (can be installed with svcpack.inf)
3.0 (runonce)
3.5 (runonce)
1.1 (runonce)
Or simply use MERGE_FRAMEWORKS=FULL
0 -
Hi Tomcat76,
and thank you so much for this super script.
Q1:
The whole thing works to the extend that all are shown in Add/Remove programs, and no errors with applications so far.
However, the languagepack for 3.0 SP0 keeps showing on Windows Update and Microsoft Update. I have tried to reinstall the packages several times, and still no luck.
Maybe most of you guys probably never use Windows Update, maybe not language packs at all, and furthermore, this error might even be on the sites themselves.
But do any of you guys experience the same thing with your localized installations? Share your thoughts.
Method:
1) Make silent installers by using the following files by the latest script (version 20080603):
dotnetfx.exe
NDP1.1sp1-KB867460-X86.exe
NDP1.1sp1-KB928366-X86.exe
langpack.exe
dotnetfx35.exe SP0
dotnetfx35langpack_x86da.exe SP0
2) And the results was:
11.947.839 DNF11_da.exe
17.888.505 DNF20_da.exe
14.976.418 DNF30_da.exe
11.666.889 DNF35.exe
3) Integrated DNF20_da.exe by putting it in I386\SVCPACK and SVCPACK.INF
4) Integrated the rest with RunOnceEx.cmd in the following order: DNF30_da.exe, DNF35.exe, DNF11_da.exe
Q2:
The above have been tried on different computermodels, and the result is the same. But should my DNF20_da.exe not be around 40 MB, instead of 17 MB?
I use the program to merge the files, but still asking for some files (Language Packs in PT-BR Portuguese Brazilian) in Windows Update. The files are:-Microsoft .NET Framework 3.0: Language Pack x86 (KB928416)
-Language Pack for Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 (KB829019)
I merged the .NET Framework 1.1, the updates for .NET 1.1, Language Pack in PT-BR for .NET 1.1, .NET Framework 3.5 and the Language Pack in PT-BR for .NET 3.5.
Any ideas?
You might consider waiting just a bit, since .NET Framework 3.5 Service pack 1 is on its way. But are you sure that you have downloaded the corresponding language pack? The filename for the full package is still dotnetfx35.exe
These are together:
And these are together:
.NET Framework 3.5 Service pack 1
.NET Framework 3.5 SP1 Language Pack
The language pack for SP1 is not available yet in Danish, so...
Patience is the greatest of all virtues, and a handful of patience is worth more than a bushel of brains.
0
Alternative: Install updated Windows 7
in Unattended Windows 7/Server 2008R2
Posted
Hi
When installing Windows 7 from USB, does the installer search the USB-key for a folder with hotfixes in it?
As you can see below, the installation process got a bullet point "Installing updates"
I am asking because I would like to have a basic WIM-image on my USB, and then updates in an easily accessable folder. I know how to update the WIM-image with DISM, but this is not what I want:
I got the following hotfixes, but where to put them?: