allesok
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by allesok
-
-
Whenever I start Word 2003 the cursor is at the upper left corner of the "paper" - (at least almost) 0 cm from the top - and, therefore, apparently in the header field, when I have started and have the blank "virgin" page for a new document in the print view.
Or it simply blanks out headers and footers, since no page number is seen (see below).
To get the normal print view I am used to from earlier versions of MS Office I have to either choose "Show header and footer" and then click close, or I have to insert page numbers (anew, since they are actually there already, see below). Then the cursor is in the upper left corner of the text field (and no more in the upper left corner of the "paper"), 2 cm below the top - as I set it to be in normal.dot.
I have set normal.dot for the page layout I want, which includes 2 cm margin at the top AND page numbering, and after choosing "Show header and footer" and closing it, the blank start page in print view appears as it should, with the settings stored in normal.dot - with page numbers showing (top center) and with the 2 cm margin at the top.
It was OK in the beginning, but then for some silly reason I clicked "Default" under Tools > Options > Compatibility tab > Options field, and after that this annoying start page view appears each time I start Word.
I also tried to delete normal.dot and let Office create a new one, but it didn't help.
Whatever I tried didn't return the view to the normal one. Why is it and what can I do?
It seems to have something to do with an alternative view that shows the pages one below the other (if there are more than one), without showing what is in the header or footer (even though there are, in this case, page numbers in the headers). It seems to just the text leaving header and footer out - their contents are simply not displayed. If I (again, since they are already there, just not shown) insert page numbers, these then do appear, since now header and footer contents are displayed. Maybe there is some view setting I cannot find under "View" in the menu, but that is somewhere else and in that case hard to find.
The view setting I have is Print Layout.
Thankful for your help
allesok
0 -
I got my answer under the wrong quote...
So I repeat it:
I have put the new AutoPach.bat in, in place of the old one, and also Manual_Start.bat.
No matter if I run the latter or Startpch.bat, I always get: "Bad command or file name".
I also tried running %COMSPEC% /E:2048 /C "C:\AUTOPACH\CODE\AUTOPACH.BAT" C:\AUTOPACH
from DOS, with the same result.
I suppose that there is a problem with memory handling under Win98SE and DOS in my desktop. Even though I have essentially the same settings in CONFIG.SYS and AUTOEXEC.BAT on both computers. If I in SYSTEM.INI leave out MaxPhysPage under [386Enh], Win98SE doesn't boot. If I set it at MaxPhysPage=40000 (which appears to be the maximum accepted), it boots. I tried MaxPhysPage=3C000 (1 GB, using only the first RAM bar), and that was OK. I tried MaxPhysPage=20000 (512 MB) and then Startpch.bat reported that there would be too little memory to run it! But in the lap-top I have only 64 MB RAM... and that works...
One of these days I'll try taking out the second 1GB RAM bar and leave out MaxPhysPage, but I would be surprised if it would help...
One more thing I may try later, not expecting much from it, is this. Just a wild guess. Since I run Win98SE and Win2000Pro in dual-boot, I also have a neat application "MountEvereything 3", which allows Win98SE to both read from and write to NTFS. Thus Win98SE works as a "boot CD on the harddisk" for Win2000. This is a main reason why I wish to have both (it is rarely but sometimes useful for doing something in Win2000, one very simple example: If a file refuses to be deleted in Win2000, being "in use", I can delete it from Win98SE, it can also be useful for certain forms of patching experiments). Who knows how much memory that application uses... I may try to uninstall MountEverything and run Auto-patcher, and then reinstall MountEverything. But again I would be surprised if that works.
Does anyone have any further advice?
Thanks for taking time for meJE
I've run out of ideas --- i tried to install Windows 98 on a Pentium D and it wouldn't install. Yours is a funny one because you got yours to install but you seemt to be having similar problems. I just don't know what else to suggest.
Signed up just to say I used your autopatcher and think it's great. Thanks for all the work on this!Thanks for the feedback! Glad to see this project draws people to MSFN, a similar thing happened to me.
Hi again!
I think the Microsoft report 253912 "Out of Memory Error Messages with Large Amounts of RAM Installed" sheds some light on this. I tried the "Workarounds" mentioned, except replacing the RAM bar with a 512 MB one. None of the two other workarounds, nor both together, solved the problem.
There is one trick to install Win98SE on a computer with a large RAM. Take RAM-bars out until you have max. 1 GB RAM. Install. Put the other RAM bars in again. This worked for me. But then it could happen that if you change something essential in CONFIG.SYS it will again not boot and you would probably again have to go through taking out a RAM bar and putting it back in... This happened to me when I added NOEMS to DEVICE=C:\WINDOWS\EMM386.EXE V", so I left that entry out again. You should also add "MaxPhysPage=40000" under [386Enh] in SYSTEM.INI (under DOS with the Editor if Win98SE doesn't yet start), and preferrably also "MaxFileCache=514288" under [vcache]. I have now manually installed all the updates in the Auto-patcher, one by one. Tedious, but what else can I do... By the way: Does Win98SE2ME overcome this problem? Does anyone know? But I suppose you should use the Auto-patcher before you do SE2ME.
In the old days you were happy to have 128 MB RAM... My old laptop, on which I first experiment with these things before applying them on my new desktop, has 64 MB. I tried to put in 256 MB, but then there was no way to make the swap file work! When the RAM was full nothing more worked... The swap file stayed empty. The laptop manufacturer suggested to uninstall Win98SE, put the bigger RAM in and reinstall, but I didn't try that yet. Could it be that a similar thing is happening here? I will have to investigate it...
In my other and newer laptop I also have Win98SE and Win2kPro in double boot (but I didn't yet try Auto-patcher there). There I first had 512 MB RAM, and Win98SE still didn't install. I found a way out how to do it. Later I added another 512 MB RAM bar, and Win98SE still booted.
I installed Win98SE as normal. It did install but the computer wouldn't boot in Win98SE, but gave an error message about some VXD file (I don't remember which one). I installed again, over the first installation, but this time with a switch: "setup /p i". At the DOS prompt write: "X:\setup /p i", where X is the CD-ROM drive letter. Then it worked.
One thing is obvious: Win98SE has trouble with big RAMs. But it seems that many new computers (or many mainboards) are to-day "Designed for Windows XP"... whatever that means... Does it mean that that is another reason why Win98SE is hard to install? Do the manufacturers have a secret deal with MS so that people will HAVE to buy newer OS-es, too, when buying a new computer? Well, I'll switch to Linux one day and in any case XP would be the very last MS OS I would ever install (which I haven't done yet), NEVER Vista...
So I will never buy a computer "Designed for Windows Vista"...! Beware!
Have a nice day everyone!
JE
0 -
1. Debugging showed:
LOCATE is: C:\AUTOPACH
COMSPEC is: C:\COMMAND.COM
Press any key to continue
Bad command or file name
2. autopach c:\autopach gave:
Out of environment space
Out of environment space
C:\WINDOWS
Unfortunately this project version needs to be able to access the system drive!
Setup will now exit .... etc.
3. Replacing %COMSPEC% with C:\COMMAND.COM changed nothing.
OK, there may be two problems here --- 1, there may be a problem with how your computer is processing certain DOS commands, and 2, your computer may be going too fast for a particular routine that is critical for the program to work. In the attachment there is an update to AutoPach.bat that now has a delay included where the problem should be (if the problem is speed). Also included is a replacement start-up file called Manual_Start.bat which should be run from the same location as Startpch.bat --- there is less code to stuff things up. When you run the file it will tell you the instructions but here they are now -- you need to install the program (copying/moving the files is fine) to a specific location which is: c:\autopach
The other thing to try is to type out the 3rd last line of Manual_Start.bat in a DOS box and see what happens. ie type %COMSPEC% /E:2048 /C "C:\AUTOPACH\CODE\AUTOPACH.BAT" C:\AUTOPACH
But now there's one question that springs to mind: could you make so that the report - as it should be as accurate as possible - would say that there is some version (and exactly which one) of the respective update installed, but not the latest?Can you give me an example of what you mean? I don't think this is possible because it would mean recording all this other extra info about each update, and I'm just not going to spend my time on that. Maybe I'm wrong which is why i'm asking for an example. I'm not worried in the slightest about long reports.
Oh and while we're at DS Client update, I've read somewhere around that the correct install order would be:1. IE6-SP1
2. DUN 1.4 Upgrade
3. DS Client for Windows98
I hope this sequence is being followed in auto-patcher.
Nope, its:
1. DUN 1.4 Upgrade (Auto-Patcher asks you to install it first)
2. IE6-SP1
3. DS Client for Windows98
I haven't experienced any problems with this order. Anyone comment? If we could somehow get a silent installer for DUN14 we could choose the order.
I got my answer under the wrong quote...
So I repeat it:
I have put the new AutoPach.bat in, in place of the old one, and also Manual_Start.bat.
No matter if I run the latter or Startpch.bat, I always get: "Bad command or file name".
I also tried running %COMSPEC% /E:2048 /C "C:\AUTOPACH\CODE\AUTOPACH.BAT" C:\AUTOPACH
from DOS, with the same result.
I suppose that there is a problem with memory handling under Win98SE and DOS in my desktop. Even though I have essentially the same settings in CONFIG.SYS and AUTOEXEC.BAT on both computers. If I in SYSTEM.INI leave out MaxPhysPage under [386Enh], Win98SE doesn't boot. If I set it at MaxPhysPage=40000 (which appears to be the maximum accepted), it boots. I tried MaxPhysPage=3C000 (1 GB, using only the first RAM bar), and that was OK. I tried MaxPhysPage=20000 (512 MB) and then Startpch.bat reported that there would be too little memory to run it! But in the lap-top I have only 64 MB RAM... and that works...
One of these days I'll try taking out the second 1GB RAM bar and leave out MaxPhysPage, but I would be surprised if it would help...
One more thing I may try later, not expecting much from it, is this. Just a wild guess. Since I run Win98SE and Win2000Pro in dual-boot, I also have a neat application "MountEvereything 3", which allows Win98SE to both read from and write to NTFS. Thus Win98SE works as a "boot CD on the harddisk" for Win2000. This is a main reason why I wish to have both (it is rarely but sometimes useful for doing something in Win2000, one very simple example: If a file refuses to be deleted in Win2000, being "in use", I can delete it from Win98SE, it can also be useful for certain forms of patching experiments). Who knows how much memory that application uses... I may try to uninstall MountEverything and run Auto-patcher, and then reinstall MountEverything. But again I would be surprised if that works.
Does anyone have any further advice?
Thanks for taking time for me
JE
0 -
OK, I scoured through all the official and unofficial updates I have around and I found a dsclient.exe package that contains negotiat.dll 5.00.2195.4784 - I suppose that's what the patcher's looking for. Haven't installed it yet, will do later on.
But now there's one question that springs to mind: could you make so that the report - as it should be as accurate as possible - would say that there is some version (and exactly which one) of the respective update installed, but not the latest?
I suppose that'd clear out some misunderstandings such as the current situation when user knows he's got something installed, the Add/Remove panel confirms, but the auto-patcher denies it. I agree it would add to the report's length, but IMHO it's worth it. Tell me what you think.
Oh and while we're at DS Client update, I've read somewhere around that the correct install order would be:
1. IE6-SP1
2. DUN 1.4 Upgrade
3. DS Client for Windows98
I hope this sequence is being followed in auto-patcher.
I have put the new AutoPach.bat in, in place of the old one, and also Manual_Start.bat.
No matter if I run the latter or Startpch.bat, I always get: "Bad command or file name".
I also tried running %COMSPEC% /E:2048 /C "C:\AUTOPACH\CODE\AUTOPACH.BAT" C:\AUTOPACH
from DOS, with the same result.
I suppose that there is a problem with memory handling under Win98SE and DOS in my desktop. Even though I have essentially the same settings in CONFIG.SYS and AUTOEXEC.BAT on both computers. If I in SYSTEM.INI leave out MaxPhysPage under [386Enh], Win98SE doesn't boot. If I set it at MaxPhysPage=40000 (which appears to be the maximum accepted), it boots. I tried MaxPhysPage=3C000 (1 GB, using only the first RAM bar), and that was OK. I tried MaxPhysPage=20000 (512 MB) and then Startpch.bat reported that there would be too little memory to run it! But in the lap-top I have only 64 MB RAM... and that works...
One of these days I'll try taking out the second 1GB RAM bar and leave out MaxPhysPage, but I would be surprised if it would help...
One more thing I may try later, not expecting much from it, is this. Just a wild guess. Since I run Win98SE and Win2000Pro in dual-boot, I also have a neat application "MountEvereything 3", which allows Win98SE to both read from and write to NTFS. Thus Win98SE works as a "boot CD on the harddisk" for Win2000. This is a main reason why I wish to have both (it is rarely but sometimes useful for doing something in Win2000, one very simple example: If a file refuses to be deleted in Win2000, being "in use", I can delete it from Win98SE, it can also be useful for certain forms of patching experiments). Who knows how much memory that application uses... I may try to uninstall MountEverything and run Auto-patcher, and then reinstall MountEverything. But again I would be surprised if that works.
Does anyone have any further advice?
Thanks for taking time for me
JE
0 -
I got this email from someone just recently, I thought I'd post for the information and hopefully the solution for all to read...email 1
I have installed your Auto-patcher for Windows 98SE, latest edition downloaded some days ago, on two computers.
It worked perfectly on one, but doesn't run on the other. Both have Win98SE installed from the same installation CD.
Config.sys and Autoexec.bat are almost the same (the "PATH" is the same in both Autoexec.bat).
Auto-patcher is installed under the same location on both computers.
One is an older lap-top and the Auto-patcher worked without problems. The other is a very new and fast desktop on which I have Win98SE + Windows 2000 Pro in a dual-boot.
On the desktop I get, when I double-click StartPch.bat: "Bad command or file name"...
I have compared the installations of the Auto-patcher, and they seem identical. I have uninstalled and again installed the Auto-patcher, but it doesn't help.
Kind regards and thanks a lot in advance
email 2
I again uninstalled Autopatcher 1.8 and installed it anew in C:\Autopach instead of the location proposed by your program. It didn't help. All essential entries are the same on both computers in CONFIG.SYS, AUTOEXEC.BAT and MSDOS.SYS.
Just to try, I then double-clicked AutoPach.bat instead, but it reported that a parameter is missing.
If I understand right, ASET.EXE locates where Auto-patcher is installed and then sets a parameter indicated by %LOCATE%.
Could it be that that parameter becomes wrong? Could I not run AutoPach.bat with a manually added parameter? Which should the parameter be?
The new and fast desktop has a motherboard that is not really designed for Win98SE and 2 GB RAM. Win98SE first didn't install because it cannot handle so much RAM. So I took one RAM bar out, and then it installed. After putting the second RAM bar back in, it still worked. (I found this trick in the Internet.) But I find it hard to believe that this would affect running the Auto-patcher.
In CONFIG.SYS I have the entry DEVICE=C:\WINDOWS\EMM386.EXE V. If I add NOEMS, it doesn't boot and reports problems which will have to do with too much RAM (the same report I had when I tried to install the first time with 2 GB RAM). So I leave NOEMS out. If I leave it out on the lap-top, Auto-patcher still runs, anyway... So that will not cause the problem.
Kind regards
Hmmm, OK lets try a few things:
1) Turn on debugging - if you edit any of the .bat files in the CODE folder you'll see a variable setting near the top -- SET DEBUG=N ... change this to SET DEBUG=Y (the text case doesn't matter) --- but in your case this isn't going to help much because your problem is way before any debugging can start. However, I have modified StartPch.bat to include debugging and I've already turned it on. Download the attachment and overwrite the appropriate file in the program folder. Run the program as normal and the two essential variables that should be the cause of the problem will be shown for you to see. Report back how you go and what happened.
2) Find the program directory and open the CODE folder. Now open a command prompt (and you should already be at the CODE folder in DOS) and type "Autopach <Locate>" where Locate is the path to the program directory. Eg if the program is in c:\autopach then use "autopach c:\autopach" and see what happens
3) Don't use the COMSPEC variable in StartPch --- replace %COMSPEC% with c:\windows\command.com or whatever the path is to command.com and see what happens.
4) The only other thing I can think of is that this is a disk drive problem --- and that your shiny new motherboard is making my DOS programming go haywire.
See how you go with all that ...
Sop.
Thanks a lot fort your kind reply.
1. Debugging showed:
LOCATE is: C:\AUTOPACH
COMSPEC is: C:\COMMAND.COM
Press any key to continue
Bad command or file name
2. autopach c:\autopach gave:
Out of environment space
Out of environment space
C:\WINDOWS
Unfortunately this project version needs to be able to access the system drive!
Setup will now exit .... etc.
3. Replacing %COMSPEC% with C:\COMMAND.COM changed nothing.
Greetings
Jan Erik
0 -
Has anyone tried to install Media Player 10 in Windows 2000?
There is a way in Win 98 and ME... but who has experience with Win 2k?
HAPPY NEW YEAR
allesok
0 -
I cannot find the following on the WIN98SE2ME website. Did I miss it, or is it missing?
Add ZIP-compression from Win ME to Win 9x or 2k
You need the following files from Win ME: DZIP32.DLL, DUNZIP32.DLL and ZIPFLDR.DLL. Copy to %windir%\system and register the last of these DLLs with regsvr32 zipfldr.dll.
(From a German PC magazine)
Best regards
allesok
0 -
-hmm, I have no personal experience w/win2000, but I've heard it described as "winxp minus some bloat and the eye candy crap", so it may have potential...
...
-wait, tell me a few things:
#1: how big is your \windows ("\winnt"? "\win2k"?) directory, and
#2: how long does it take to COMPLETELY cold boot, boot from hibernate, and shutdown? ("completely" means waiting for ALL things to load up in SysTray, and no more hourglasses)... include your CPU speed for reference...
>;]
The WinNT folder is 1.33 GB after all possible updates and hotfixes and with a lot of applications installed. The start-up does take a while longer than with Win98SE but is tolerable to me. I use, however, FAT32, since then my Win98SE on the same harddisk can communicate directly also with Win2k files. When I one day reinstall, I will instead use an application "Mount everything" (aquired in the meantime), which enables Win98SE to fully communicate both ways with NTFS.
Regards
allesok
I should add the much of the longer startup time has to do with the antivirus program that I don't need for my desktop (not connected to the Internet).
allesok
0 -
-hmm, I have no personal experience w/win2000, but I've heard it described as "winxp minus some bloat and the eye candy crap", so it may have potential...
...
-wait, tell me a few things:
#1: how big is your \windows ("\winnt"? "\win2k"?) directory, and
#2: how long does it take to COMPLETELY cold boot, boot from hibernate, and shutdown? ("completely" means waiting for ALL things to load up in SysTray, and no more hourglasses)... include your CPU speed for reference...
>;]
The WinNT folder is 1.33 GB after all possible updates and hotfixes and with a lot of applications installed. The start-up does take a while longer than with Win98SE but is tolerable to me. I use, however, FAT32, since then my Win98SE on the same harddisk can communicate directly also with Win2k files. When I one day reinstall, I will instead use an application "Mount everything" (aquired in the meantime), which enables Win98SE to fully communicate both ways with NTFS.
Regards
allesok
0 -
You must...no, only i'm the guard, NOW GET BACK IN LINE !
feel the power...
of the Dark Side... [insert James Earl Jones' voice here]
must.......buy.......XP.......NOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!
How about the compromise of using Win 2000 Pro? Works well for me. Especially with the dual-boot installation 98SE plus 2000. I have it on my Internet computer but stay with 98SE on my desktop (not connected to the Internet). Or Linux? I'll try it and it is definitely the 1st choice instead of Longhorn... A friend is a FreeBSE freak and says that that one is the best.
Allesok
0 -
Ex, I got "corrupt file" message for these RAR files. Could you check them?
Finally, I downloaded it.
I think the server has hotlinking protection. So, you have to copy the link manually into the browser's address bar.
Yes, it has a hotlinking protection. Just left-click (instead of right-click) "Here", and you'll see. Copying the link manually did work well.
Thanks
allesok
0 -
Ex, I got "corrupt file" message for these RAR files. Could you check them?
That's odd... I just downloaded them from that link and they extracted fine. How many times did you try downloading? Maybe server was acting funny for a while?
Same here still... I downloaded 4 times in 3 days, no success...
Please check the files.
Best regards
allesok
0 -
Looks like that particular pic does not exist in that directory.Can someone help me with this problem? After installed Win98SE2ME i have a problem when i try to open a picture file.I got the exact same problem when I enabled "option 3". Also, the exact same thing happened when I tried the Revolution's Pack. It was more than just pictures though, it was nearly every file on my HD that got that error as well as being unable to open Control Panel, My Computer, etc. (no I didn't install RP on top of option3). This error was mentioned in my first post also.
Gape, Thanks! HERE'S the same logos, but without the "2 Me", (you'll have to right-click/save as). If there are other changes you would like me to make, just let me know.
MDGx, Thanks for all the help. I'll have to go through that piece by piece later. I'm glad you like the logos.... sure you can use them however/wherever you want. I can also change them to suite whatever you'd like. I went with that background for my PC cause I've got a silver XP theme going on.
BTW, I went ahead and installed 98SE2ME without option3 on a different PC, (HP 500MHZ PIII, 64MB RAM, onboard everything), and so far I've not noticed any problems. I also reinstalled Windows 98SE on my PC, (not a clean install though), and tried 98SE2ME without option3 again... and so far I've not noticed the major slow down like before. I used to run RegCleaner every so often, so maybe it deleted some of the entries you mentioned. To give you an idea of how it's doing now... I've not rebooted since I had Photoshop open to make those logos yesterday and it seems to be gagging when I move around the start menu, but I seem to be ok otherwise. I haven't opened my 3D modeler yet tho... that proggy is pretty taxing. Usually (with standard 98SE), I can have Photoshop open working on Textures, Zmod open working on models, and a game open testing them in-game, all at the same time without any hiccups on my PC. But thanks again for the help. With the info you gave, I'll get the kinks worked out with my PC. B)
-Ex
edit:
Did another set while I was at it...
You can get it HERE, (right-click/save as).
Well, this is the rar-file I mean, that seems to be corrupt.
allesok
0 -
Well, my WinRAR claims that this rar-file would be corrupt...
The rar-file of two eaarlier logos by you was ok, however.
Best regards
allesok
0 -
I wish to express my admiration for the great job performed by MDGx, Tihiy, Gape, Maximus Decim, Petr and others!
You are great, guys! The job is really very valuable.java script:emoticon('
')smilie
Yours
allesok
0 -
The URLs below no more work...
Where can I find update_sys-wme.zip?
Updated UPDATE.SYS for Windows 98 SE, version changed to 4.10.2223
http://www.code.cz/x/update_sys-w98se.zip
Updated UPDATE.SYS for Windows 98 SE, version changed to 4.90.3001
http://www.code.cz/x/update_sys-wme.zip
Best regards
allesok
0
')
Annoyance with Word 2003
in Microsoft Office
Posted
Thanks a lot to to both of you, both advices work!
allesok