Jump to content

CounterStrike

Member
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    United States

About CounterStrike

CounterStrike's Achievements

0

Reputation

  1. OK, not that I am surprised in any way that the message screener (smtp filter for ISA2000) works this way but I have to ask to see if there is another way to do this. Our ISA2000 server is setup to publish (externally) the internal interface hosted smtp server. The mail is then relayed from the internal ISA smtp server to our internal exchange server. This works great. Until recently though, we had our exchange server delivering mail directly outbound (not using the isa seerver as smart host). However, to be technically correct in our dns and reverse dns lookups for smtp, we have changed our internal exchange server to use the internal ISA server smtp server to be the smart host for delivery. This works great too. However, the problem that I am having is that we are using the message screener to strip off specific attachment types (specifically in this case .zip) and it is also stripping off the zip files that are being sent outbound from our employees. As 95% of all inbound zip files are virus-filled, I really don't want to unblock them from being stripped, but at the same time the internal users still need to send zip files out. Here is the meat of my question: Can the message screener be configured differently for outbound mail and inbound mail? Can anyone out there think of a solution to this problem? Thanks, CounterStrike
  2. So I figured out my problem, the svcpack.inf was missing the Major and minor version under the Version Header MajorVersion=5 MinorVersion=1 BuildNumber=2600 Anyway, I still have my other question that went unanswered about a log file that shows that anything in svcpack.inf was run or even attempted to run. I know that the indivdual hotfixes generate the kb article log files in the windows directory (which only happens when they run), but apart from that does anyone know if there is a higher log file that refernces them running during the setup (T 13)? Thanks
  3. Let me reitterrate what ever other new poster has said...This booard is awesome. I have been using the knowledge of this board to complete our last successful rollout in our company for XP with SP1 and post hotfixes integrated. The one difference is that I am not burning bootable cds, but rather we are using RIS. This has been highly successful up until now and hence my reason for posting. Let me state that I really need to run these hotfixes in the svcpack.inf, as the goal here is to start the install and have the users able to login when it is done. I have two models of boards that I am dealing with Intel 815EFVLU and Intel 865GLCLK and have most of the drivers picking up during the install (little tweaking left with that to do). I accomplish all the rest of the software installs through an AD packages via group policy. So let me get to the meat of my question. Has anything changed since SP1 about the ability to install hotfixes via the svcpack.inf? I have my new image (XPPro w/SP2)setup the same as the old one(XP Pro w/SP1), however when the install is done it does not appear that any of the hotfixes have run. Also, would the setuplog.txt in C:\WINDOWS\setuplog.txt log anything run via the svcpack.inf? I looked through it but could not find any file that was being called or executed with any of the files that I have specified in the svcpack.inf. Specifically, the files I am trying to install via svcpack.inf are: KB885835 KB886185 KB885836 KB834707 KB885626 dotnetfw Qchain Any help or insight would be appreciated. Thanks
×
×
  • Create New...