visata

Why the required data weren't found in the ReadyBoot cache? Should the data be stored in a specific order, I mean first HDD bits should be drivers, processes so ReadyBoot could rapidly load it into RAM? That's why we need defragmentation? After I trained the prefetcher based on your guide my total boot time reduced from 178s to 87s. I must say it's very impressive, why I never heard about such methods before. I will upgrade nod32, change to AHCI mode and post my results but basically I'm happy now with my 87s.

Thanks for the feedback. I use IDE mode. Should I change it to AHCI? Can I improve Registry and User profile loading times? I'd like to learn more about how to analyse such reports. Could you please explain how did you figure out that? Is it based on etl or summary file? You spotted misses of ReadyBoot prefetcher after looking at ReadyBoot I/O section of etl file? Does it mean it failed to load drivers, services into RAM and in later stages it had to use HDD instead of RAM and that's why HDD became bottleneck of my boot? Will try to look at your guide and send you a new report when I apply it on my system. PS is there an easy way to find out which hotfixes your system has? Search in "View update history" doesn't seem to work. I only managed to search through console like this: wmic qfe get | grep KB2505454 Could you possibly post typical load values of each stage in your main post? For example PC with such specs 500gb HDD, CPU q6600... typical values of bootDoneViaPostBoot=100000, PreSMSS... possibly add some screenshots from Windows Performance analyser. People could compare with their own figures and find out whether it's slow or not.

Could you please let me know why my windows boot time so long. Here are the links to my report: https://rapidshare.com/files/3017524858/report.part01.rar https://rapidshare.com/files/2573614604/report.part02.rar https://rapidshare.com/files/4004118185/report.part03.rar Thank you