m1ck Posted May 18, 2007 Share Posted May 18, 2007 (edited) i get this in ms virtual machine.Please insert the disk labeled windows xp service pack 2 cd into A drive.....press enter when ready.thing is sp2 has already been integrated.any ideas?.cheers mickEdit:- this is the new patched version Edited May 18, 2007 by m1ck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bacardi2001 Posted May 19, 2007 Share Posted May 19, 2007 i THINK during the setup process with nlite you needed to disable the sfc option. i THINK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelsenellenelvian Posted May 19, 2007 Share Posted May 19, 2007 You deleted the disk id files!!WIN51WIN51IPWIN51IP.SP2You have to have these at the root of your disk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
m1ck Posted May 19, 2007 Author Share Posted May 19, 2007 (edited) You deleted the disk id files!!WIN51WIN51IPWIN51IP.SP2You have to have these at the root of your disk. nope.@bacardi2001 ok thanks for that i will check it and make sure its disabled.i've unticked sfc will try another run and see if that fixes it. Edited May 19, 2007 by m1ck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gabix698 Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 (edited) i get this in ms virtual machine.Please insert the disk labeled windows xp service pack 2 cd into A drive.....press enter when ready.thing is sp2 has already been integrated.any ideas?.cheers mickEdit:- this is the new patched versionI had the same problem today with Service Pack 3 !! WIN51WIN51IPWIN51IP.SP2WIN51IP.SP3 Open them and check if each file has inside written "Windows" (without quotes). I haven't had "Windows" in the WIN51IP.SP3 (so, it was blank).Each file should contain "Windows" in it. I was building a custom WinXP EN SP3 ISO with SetupStudio. The problem occured when I was trying to install to VM (Virtualbox).I posted here to help others who will trying to find solution to this problem. Edited February 24, 2009 by gabix698 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaclaz Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 Well, not entirely accurate. The "old" rule, was:WIN51 -> contains "Windows" (without quotes)WIN51IP -> contains "Windows" (without quotes) - BUT it can be empty as wellWIN51IP.SP1 -> is emptyWIN51IP.SP2 -> is emptyhttp://www.msfn.org/board/XP-SP2-bootable-...in-t111302.htmlhttp://www.911cd.net/forums//index.php?showtopic=13265Thus, normally:WIN51IP.SP3 -> is emptycdob additionally reports:http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?showto...129399&st=6that using "nul" files is possible and works.There is no need for "previous" WIN51IP.SPx files, only the one appropriate to the SP slipstreamed is needed.Maybe it is something that Setupstudio requires? jaclaz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnhc Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 Have you two followed my standard rules? Please attach (not paste) your Last Session.ini. Make sure to always start with a fresh copy of your CD files/folders, do all your work in one nLite session and integrate only one SP. Enjoy, John. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaclaz Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 Have you two followed my standard rules? Please attach (not paste) your Last Session.ini. Make sure to always start with a fresh copy of your CD files/folders, do all your work in one nLite session and integrate only one SP. Enjoy, John.johnc,take it easy. Last two posts do not need to follow your "standard" rules, they are made in the hope to try and clarify the matter.Original problem was (hopefully) solved since May 2007, long before you even joined MSFN. jaclaz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnhc Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 jaclaz, I will, indeed, take it easy. I concluded that all problems were not resolved and was surprised no one had suggested the rules, thus my response. When violated, they often lead to the kind of symptom observed here. Enjoy, John. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaclaz Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 jaclaz, I will, indeed, take it easy. I concluded that all problems were not resolved and was surprised no one had suggested the rules, thus my response. When violated, they often lead to the kind of symptom observed here. Enjoy, John.Yep, sure , but WHEN were your Rules established?WHERE are they published? jaclaz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
!!CHAOS!! Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 indeed, i didn't see that in the posting rules. (which should probably be moved to the top of the sticky's to avoid future issues, even though some users will ignore them even if you tattoo them on the inside of said users eyelids) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now