Targaff Posted March 22, 2007 Share Posted March 22, 2007 Tihiy: could you take another look at Miranda if you get the chance? The .32bitimgl method was working originally but something that's changed in the meantime appears to have broken it partly, at least for me. The same chat dialog only has correct icons on mouseover, while some parts of the UI don't seem to draw correctly, though I'm not sure why.Cheers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drugwash Posted March 22, 2007 Share Posted March 22, 2007 You haven't specified which Miranda version should be checked: the stable 0.6.x branch, or the development 0.7.x one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tihiy Posted March 22, 2007 Author Share Posted March 22, 2007 Checked last 0.7.x version and did work for me.However, i can think one reason: IF those icons are painted over WHITE (window) color, then they may have broken shadow.This limitation is because of some complicated matters and is candidate for next [if there is] version. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tihiy Posted March 23, 2007 Author Share Posted March 23, 2007 Please note that some parts from Windows 98 Revolutions for 2000 Revolutions too, for exampleAdd/Remove programs applet replacement toolhttp://tihiy.ahanix.org/programs.zipTry and be impressed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Targaff Posted March 24, 2007 Share Posted March 24, 2007 Well it's not white; off-white, but not actual white. However, that does appear to be the issue, as per the attached picture - if I change to, say, Slate colour scheme or anything similarly darker, it's no longer there.I've seen the Add/Remove Programs previously and quite like it, but I haven't noticed anywhere whether there's any way to make it replace the standard one automatically? That would be nice - currently I'm using Safarp which adds a control panel item, and then disabling the original one in tweakui, which i presume should be possible with this as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tihiy Posted March 30, 2007 Author Share Posted March 30, 2007 (edited) Good news boys and girls!W'2000 Revolutions Pack 2.0 is coming.New:- Explorer Toolbar with 32-bit icons and disabled icon shadingFixed:- Problems with icons drawn on white (window) color- Toolbar 16-colored disabled icons were sometimes weirdRP Installer:- Easy install/upgrade/uninstall- File patching (yea, i didn't want to, but some changes must be made)- Silent install & slipstreaming (possibly) Edited March 30, 2007 by Tihiy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave.Net Posted March 31, 2007 Share Posted March 31, 2007 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yagami_ex Posted March 31, 2007 Share Posted March 31, 2007 Hi again, the Windows 2000 Revolutions Pack 2.0 will need the W2K English? or the language will be neutral?PS:Again, sorry, my bad english. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tihiy Posted March 31, 2007 Author Share Posted March 31, 2007 Revolutions Pack for Windows 2000 is designed to be language neutral. This is goal for all versions.In fact, 2.0 is ready BUT! There is file replace issue. It fails to replace system file even if I specify to do this before startup It works if started in Safe Mode, but it is not comfortable. I'll release it after finding way ASAP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexanrs Posted March 31, 2007 Share Posted March 31, 2007 Revolutions Pack for Windows 2000 is designed to be language neutral. This is goal for all versions.In fact, 2.0 is ready BUT! There is file replace issue. It fails to replace system file even if I specify to do this before startup It works if started in Safe Mode, but it is not comfortable. I'll release it after finding way ASAP.Have you tried Replacer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave.Net Posted April 1, 2007 Share Posted April 1, 2007 Any chance of a manual-replacement version? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tihiy Posted April 1, 2007 Author Share Posted April 1, 2007 (edited) W'2000 Revolutions Pack 2.0 released for testing <see later post>WARNING: NOT main-system safe until is properly tested. Dunno how new file replacer will work Install: 0) If 1.x versions were installed not in \windows\system32 directory, then you must unregister it. Or manually clean AppInit_DLLs [Google] key.1) Run setuprp.exe, click Install.2) Reboot.3) PROFIT!Back up is in \system32: browseui.bak and comdlg32.bakUninstall: In add/remove programs. Edited April 2, 2007 by Tihiy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
damian666 Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 hi tihiy, testting it for you tonight...any changes in the rpl2k.dll?or just the installer thats new?and once again i ask you, why not team up?please let me know!damian666 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tihiy Posted April 2, 2007 Author Share Posted April 2, 2007 hi tihiy, testting it for you tonight...any changes in the rpl2k.dll?I've written what's changed.You'll have to write installer routines for rpl2k.dll now yourself, or use my installer.and once again i ask you, why not team up?Where's screenshot i've been asking for? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
damian666 Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 (edited) ok thats fair enough...well i have some here but they are for someone so they contain comment and stuff.but they are clear enough...so hereThis is with my vistapack applied!i use your rpl2k.dll for the icons, great fix btw!i also use wildbill's tclock, but it has to many bugs to use all the time but im sure it will get better!so now want to make a f*cking nice pack for 2000?please let me know man.oh and a question, new installer routines?cant i just regsvr it anymore?damian666 Edited April 2, 2007 by damian666 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now