rehack Posted February 13, 2007 Share Posted February 13, 2007 i'm amazed i haven't seen this before, but JkDefrag is everything i've wanted in a defragger:- it's small like it should be (300kb download)- open source- uses the windows defrag api so it's as fast/safe as every other defragger- has a gui for those who absolutely must see a pretty picture- also has a gui-less version that runs silently whenever you like it to- performs a full contiguity optimization unlike the standard windows defrag- .. and is just friggin awesome.i hope someone else enjoys finding this as much as i did! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moongoon Posted February 13, 2007 Share Posted February 13, 2007 Thanks for the heads up on a really, really free defrag. I do like a GUI though. I especially like a pause or stop button which jk doesn't have Although not open source Auslogics Defrag is free for personal and commercial use and works in a Win PE environment.http://www.auslogics.com/disk-defrag/index.phpAuslogics can't beat the size of jk though.. wow! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeremy Posted February 14, 2007 Share Posted February 14, 2007 I uninstalled Diskeeper, switched to this with the intention of trying it for one week or until I notice any performance degrade as a result of it not doing what it's supposed to do properly, then analyze my drives with Diskeeper and PerfectDisk at that point and see how it compares.Hey, I'm all for smaller software. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rehack Posted February 14, 2007 Author Share Posted February 14, 2007 about all i could imagine this wouldn't do is be able to track file usage patterns and store files on the disk in the order they're most often read.. a very useful optimization to be sure, but this program has just blown me away in terms of no-nonsense functionality, small size, no resident services that eat up 10+ mb of ram.. i'm just glad i found it.and i love the screensaver mode. defrag while idle, it's perfect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ascii2 Posted February 15, 2007 Share Posted February 15, 2007 I tried the utility.Apparently it uses Windows defragmentation library.The results of the tool seem inferior to that of the degragmentation snap-in that comes with Windows 2000. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeremy Posted February 15, 2007 Share Posted February 15, 2007 Apparently it uses Windows defragmentation library.Care to elaborate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaclaz Posted February 15, 2007 Share Posted February 15, 2007 I uninstalled Diskeeper, switched to this with the intention of trying it for one week or until I notice any performance degrade as a result of it not doing what it's supposed to do properly, then analyze my drives with Diskeeper and PerfectDisk at that point and see how it compares.Hey, I'm all for smaller software.Interesting, I had thought you were "married" to diskeeper :http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?showto...85812&st=47@allSome more links to FREE or LOW COST defraggers and related apps can be found on my post here:http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?showto...85812&st=22jaclaz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeremy Posted February 15, 2007 Share Posted February 15, 2007 Interesting, I had thought you were "married" to diskeeper Well, I suppose we're spending some time apart. I'm tired of using software that needs to be paid for. It's nice to find a free/open-source alternative to the commercial big boys. I'm more for giving the small ones a chance for comparison purposes nowadays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bledd Posted February 15, 2007 Share Posted February 15, 2007 another option is to put 'contig.exe' in your s32 folder, and use power defragmenterhttp://www.softpedia.com/get/System/Hard-D...ragmenter.shtmlcontig is made by sysinternals Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ascii2 Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 Apparently it uses Windows defragmentation library.Care to elaborate?From the author's "Frequently asked questions" section on his website, "JkDefrag is based on the standard defragmentation API by Microsoft, a system library that is included in Windows 2000, 2003, XP". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rehack Posted February 16, 2007 Author Share Posted February 16, 2007 the idea that this could in any way be inferior to microsoft's own bundled defrag is a bit odd, since they both call the exact same functions to perform defragging (i.e., the exact same defrag functions that ALL other defraggers call, diskeeper, contig, etc.).plus this utility forces contiguous space optimization, which microsoft's utility notably fails at (it termintes operation sooner, to appear faster). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeremy Posted February 16, 2007 Share Posted February 16, 2007 So I've been running JKDefrag for several days now and I decided to install Diskeeper and run an analysis. Diskeeper reported my drives as not suffering from fragmentation and my second HDD (which is used for storage only) had absolutely no dragmentation at all. My C drive had 24 fragments and 44 excess fragments. The 132KB JKDefrag application does the job perfectly without the extra bells and whistles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJARRRPCGP Posted March 17, 2007 Share Posted March 17, 2007 So I've been running JKDefrag for several days now and I decided to install Diskeeper and run an analysis. Diskeeper reported my drives as not suffering from fragmentation and my second HDD (which is used for storage only) had absolutely no dragmentation at all. My C drive had 24 fragments and 44 excess fragments. The 132KB JKDefrag application does the job perfectly without the extra bells and whistles.I agree! Because on one of my PCs, with Windows XP Pro 2002 SP2 with Internet Explorer 7, seems to be faster. Internet Explorer 7 on that PC, which I'm typing this post on seems to be faster, even with 56k. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeremy Posted March 17, 2007 Share Posted March 17, 2007 I'm using Ultimate Defrag at the moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MioKawaii Posted January 10, 2008 Share Posted January 10, 2008 UltraDefrag GNU GPL for win32 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now