rdon Posted October 3, 2004 Share Posted October 3, 2004 Yes it will if you use the windows update method or the batch file method but if you slipstream them i am not sure about that.HI! I"m new to the forum and just picked you from the bunch.are'nt you lucky. I'm having trouble with my computer.windows xphome edition. It was already installed and fine when I had anotherproblem and thats when I tried to reinstall XP. anyway it won't finish installing and I get the error message SXS>DLL: snytax error in manifest or poicy file "D"\1386\asms\6000\msft\vcrtl\vcrtl.man" online 21Hope it makes more sense to you. thanks for any help offered.have a nice day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alanoll Posted October 4, 2004 Share Posted October 4, 2004 What does this have to do with Hotfixes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robnjay Posted October 16, 2004 Share Posted October 16, 2004 (I accidently posted this in the XP forum, I think it really belongs here)How about these:Q824151 (11th October 2004)Vulnerability in WebDAV XML Message Handler Could Lead to a Denial of ServiceDownload - 942KBQ841553 (12th October 2004)Vulnerability in NetDDE Could Allow Remote Code ExecutionDownload - 706KBQ840987 (12th October 2004) REPLACES: Q811493 and Q824141Security Update for Microsoft WindowsDownload - 5902KBQ873376 (12th October 2004) REPLACES: Q329048Vulnerability in Compressed (zipped) Folders Could Allow Remote Code ExecutionDownload - 475KBQ841356 (12th October 2004) REPLACES: Q821557 and Q839645Vulnerability in Windows Shell Could Allow Remote Code ExecutionDownload - 4280KBQ834707 (12th October 2004)Cumulative Security Update for Internet ExplorerDownload the Update for IE6 SP1 - 3126KBQ873377 (14th October 2004) REPLACES: Q832894Update Rollup for Internet Explorer SP1Download the Update Rollup for IE6 SP1 - 3136KBQ824151 and Q841553 are listed as "Important" security issues on M$ website. The rest are "Crititcal". I suppose Q834707 replaces the current CSU for IE6 (download is for IE6 SP1).I'm getting a little confused about all the hotfixes, so could someone help with this? I've done a little of the grunt work (posting these in the format used by Aaron) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
straffin Posted October 25, 2004 Share Posted October 25, 2004 Hey all...Just had this one show up on a PC based on the info in this thread:Q839643 (8th June 2004)Vulnerability in DirectPlay Could Allow Denial of ServiceDownload - 435KBI'm using the following switches: KB839643.EXE /quiet /passive /norestart /nWhy is this one not listed before now? Am I missing something? Is it assumed that we are all upgrading DirectX? (We're not.)(I'm not complaining... I just don't think we *all* could have missed this...)- John Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fluffy_ninja Posted December 8, 2004 Share Posted December 8, 2004 Hello. There seem to be quite a few patches available for XP SP1. I'm an admin for a company still using SP1 with no plans to go to SP2 for the forseeable future. In the next couple of weeks I'll try to update the list on this forum by using MBSA - lovely tool from Microsoft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanVM Posted December 8, 2004 Share Posted December 8, 2004 Are you blind and unable to see the sticky at the top of this forum??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incroyable HULK Posted December 8, 2004 Share Posted December 8, 2004 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astalavista Posted December 8, 2004 Share Posted December 8, 2004 that really cracks me up right there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanVM Posted December 8, 2004 Share Posted December 8, 2004 I mean, come on. I know the search feature of the forum sucks, but that's no excuse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nologic Posted December 8, 2004 Share Posted December 8, 2004 Guys, guys, why so harsh?It was a nice gesture even if it was unneeded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts