cybpsych Posted May 11, 2004 Share Posted May 11, 2004 Aaron,my svcpack.inf contain this:[setupHotfixesToRun]update.exe -q -nQ330994.exe /Q:A /R:Njs56nen.exe /Q:A /R:NQ816093.exe /Q:A /R:NQ823182.exe /Q /O /N /ZQ824105.exe /Q /O /N /ZQ824141.exe /Q /O /N /ZQ825119.exe /Q /O /N /ZQ828035.exe /Q /O /N /ZQ828028.exe /Q /O /N /ZWMP9MM2.exeQ828026.exe /Q /O /N /ZQ828741.exe /Q /O /N /ZQ832353.exe /Q /O /N /ZQ832894.exe /Q:A /R:NQ831167.exe /Q:A /R:NQ835732.exe /Q /O /N /ZQ837001.exe /Q /O /N /ZQ837009.exe /Q:A /R:NQ837251.exe /Q:A /R:NQ840374.exe /Q /O /N /Zqchain.exeDX9NTopk.exedo i need this line? -> update.exe -q -nyour svcpack.inf doesn't contain this though. just wondering if it's needed thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aaron Posted May 12, 2004 Author Share Posted May 12, 2004 Only if you're slipstreaming the rollup update 1. I don't use, or endorse this method anymore due to issues that can rise from it according to some members. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkBringer Posted May 12, 2004 Share Posted May 12, 2004 AaronXP......When can we use the /integrate switch for the type two hotfixes?I was thinking of using it and pointing to the I386 directory, but that's how it's used is it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edmoncu Posted May 12, 2004 Share Posted May 12, 2004 @AaronXPyour svcpack.inf contains this:[SetupHotfixesToRun]JS56NEN.exe /Q:A /R:Nmdac.cmdKB823182.exe /Q /N /Z /OKB824105.exe /Q /N /Z /OKB824141.exe /Q /N /Z /OKB825119.exe /Q /N /Z /OKB826939.exe /Q /N /Z /OKB828035.exe /Q /N /Z /OKB828741.exe /Q /N /Z /OKB832894.exe /Q:A /R:NKB831167.exe /Q:A /R:NKB835732.exe /Q /N /Z /OKB837001.exe /Q /N /Z /OKB837009.exe /Q:A /R:NKB840374.exe /Q /N /Z /OWMP9MM2.exeKB828026.exe /Q /N /Z /ODX9NTopk.exei saw these 2 lines:KB832894.exe /Q:A /R:NKB831167.exe /Q:A /R:Ni would like to know is if these two lines were intentionally put this way? i thought installation has to be arranged in ascending order. i also have the same question for the mdac (Q832483) i would also like to know if would this be applicable on non-sp1 slipstreamed xpcd? or sp1 has to be slipstreamed 1st on the xpcd? thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denney Posted May 12, 2004 Share Posted May 12, 2004 Those hotfixes are for Internet Explorer and one is the cumulative update (KB832894) and therefore has to be installed before the single update (KB831167).As for MDAC, it doesn't matter because MDAC is a standalone update (not requiring any other updates). Ofcourse, you can install that one in the right place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edmoncu Posted May 12, 2004 Share Posted May 12, 2004 thanks. its clear now. btw, mine's like this:[SetupHotfixesToRun]JS56NEN.exe /Q:A /R:N"Q832483.exe /C:""dahotfix.exe /q /n"" /q:a"KB823182.exe /Q /N /Z /OKB824105.exe /Q /N /Z /OKB824141.exe /Q /N /Z /OKB825119.exe /Q /N /Z /OKB826939.exe /Q /N /Z /OKB828035.exe /Q /N /Z /OKB828741.exe /Q /N /Z /OQ832894.exe /Q:A /R:NQ831167.exe /Q:A /R:NKB835732.exe /Q /N /Z /OKB837001.exe /Q /N /Z /OKB837009.exe /Q:A /R:NKB840374.exe /Q /N /Z /OWMP9MM2.exeQ828026.exe /Q /N /Z /Oqchain.exeDX9NTopk.i got another question though, i was wondering, should i still keep qchain.exe in the list? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanVM Posted May 12, 2004 Share Posted May 12, 2004 And of course, installation order shouldn't really matter at all since all current hotfixes theoretically have qchain functionality built into them anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwAToNeR Posted May 15, 2004 Share Posted May 15, 2004 (edited) I got a problem... While on t-13 it pops this:[ProductCatalogsToInstall] KB826939.cat[SetupHotfixesToRun] js56nen.exe /Q:A /R:Nmsjavwu.exe /Q:A /R:NKB817778.exe /q /n /z /o (This one got off to a atch file)KB822603.exe /q /n /z /oKB823182.exe /q /n /z /oKB823980.exe /q /n /z /oKB824105.exe /q /n /z /oKB824141.exe /q /n /z /oKB824146.exe /q /n /z /oKB825119.exe /q /n /z /oKB826939.exe /q /n /zKB828028.exe /quiet /passive /norestart /o /nKB826942.exe /quiet /passive /norestart /o /nKB828035.exe /q /n /z /oKB828741.EXE /q /n /z /oKB833330.exe /quiet /passive /norestart /o /nKB835732.exe /q /n /z /oKB837001.exe /q /n /z /oQ282784.exe /q /n /z /oQ312370.exe /q /n /z /oQ319580.exe /q /n /z /oQ327405.exe /Q:A /R:NQ327979.exe /q /n /z /oQ814995.exe /q /n /z /oQ815062.exe /q /n /z /o;-Wrong switch above this....Q816093.exe /q /n /z /oQ819696.exe /q /n /z /oQ820223.exe /Q:A /R:NQ824145.exe /Q:A /R:NQ828026.exe /q /n /z /oQ828750.exe /Q:A /R:NQ831167.exe /Q:A /R:NQ832894.exe /Q:A /R:NKB840374.exe /q /n /z /oDX9NTopk.exeqchain.exeGot any idea? I have these switches from this topic and from running hotfixes with /? switchWhich one might it be the problem?I am sure it is from the ones above q816093.exe cuz it popped me later error on q816093 also. Edited May 17, 2004 by SwAToNeR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilvoice Posted May 15, 2004 Share Posted May 15, 2004 817778 can not be run from svcpack.inf... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAVERICKS CHOICE Posted May 15, 2004 Share Posted May 15, 2004 Aaron XP I just tried to re download Q837001 as your guide "You may also want to re-download Q837001, as it's been re-released." But it still shows the same file version no 5.4.1.0? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wraith Posted May 16, 2004 Share Posted May 16, 2004 Don't suppose anybody knows of an RSS newsfeed for hotfixes? Or should I go make one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Imran Posted May 16, 2004 Share Posted May 16, 2004 Only if you're slipstreaming the rollup update 1. I don't use, or endorse this method anymore due to issues that can rise from it according to some members.What kind of issues? I personally haven't had problems as yet but would like to know what to expect... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenMachine Posted May 16, 2004 Share Posted May 16, 2004 If you were having issues, you would know already, during slipstreaming or installation. If you made it to Windows Update, and that looked OK, you should be fine. The method used in the MSFN guide, however, is specific to the Security Rollup, and does not allow for slipstreaming a second hotfix. As SP2 approaches, the Rollup will become redundant, thus the MS method of SVCPACK.INF can be used. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwAToNeR Posted May 17, 2004 Share Posted May 17, 2004 817778 can not be run from svcpack.inf...Even though i got the same problem....Hope the link 2 image is ok now.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Imran Posted May 17, 2004 Share Posted May 17, 2004 If you were having issues, you would know already, during slipstreaming or installation. If you made it to Windows Update, and that looked OK, you should be fine. The method used in the MSFN guide, however, is specific to the Security Rollup, and does not allow for slipstreaming a second hotfix. As SP2 approaches, the Rollup will become redundant, thus the MS method of SVCPACK.INF can be used.No.. I don't have any issues. What I meant to ask were the reasons why Aaron had stopped using the update rollup integration method. He mentions problems faced by some people and I would like to know what those problems were.I already know what the guide is about. Thanks for your concern. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts