Jump to content

HOTFIXES: Win2000 SP4, WinXP SP2, WinXP SP3 and Win2003 SP2


Recommended Posts


List updated. Enjoy.

Hey there ... thanks for all the work on the list, i've been using it extensively for the last few hours trying to get my unattended CD up-to-date, and now i've got some questions ...

1) KB890859: how critical is this ... i've left it off my test CD and Windows Update doesn't complain. It's also not listed in RyanVM's Windows XP Post-SP2 Update Pack which was last updated June 2007. But it IS in the last AutopatcherXP. What's the best way of determining if this has or has not been replaced by a newer update?

2) as well as kb890859 above, this is the list of updates i left off the CD and which Windows Update doesn't complain about being missing:

* kb890859

* kb891781

* kb899587

* kb899589

* kb900725

* kb902400 (missing from MSFN list, but listed in AP)

* kb904706

* kb914389

* kb917537

* kb917953

* kb918118

(i'm adding to it as i go)

3) I'm also using the last ever official release of AutoPatcher XP (August 2007) as a guide and i was wondering why the big differences between the 3 lists i'm using that i've mentioned (ie this one, RyanVM's, and Autopatcher). I want to know which list to best rely on!

4) kb891122: should have been listed as a 'removed' hotfix when wmp11 was added. Please correct me if i'm wrong.

5) i'll probably have more questions soon!

Thanks in advance for any help on these questions!

Edited by soporific
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  1. KB890859: Required. KB931784 replaces some (but not all) of its files, which may be why Windows Update does not flag it for you.
    authz.dll	5.1.2600.2622 - Current
    ntkrnlmp.exe 5.1.2600.2622 - Replaced by KB931784 5.1.2600.3093
    ntkrnlpa.exe 5.1.2600.2622 - Replaced by KB931784 5.1.2600.3093
    ntkrpamp.exe 5.1.2600.2622 - Replaced by KB931784 5.1.2600.3093
    ntoskrnl.exe 5.1.2600.2622 - Replaced by KB931784 5.1.2600.3093
    user32.dll 5.1.2600.2622 - Current
    win32k.sys 5.1.2600.2622 - Current
    winsrv.dll 5.1.2600.2622 - Current


  2. Other Updates
    • KB890859: See 1 above
    • KB891781: Required, nothing has replaced this update. No clue why it's not flagged for you.
      dhtmled.ocx  6.1.0000.9232 - Current


    • KB899587: Required, nothing has replaced this update. No clue why it's not flagged for you.
      kerberos.dll 5.1.2600.2698 - Current


    • KB899589: Replaced by KB923980--Removed from this list November 14, 2006 (see first post).
    • KB900725: Required. KB928255 replaces some (but not all) of its files, which may be why Windows Update does not flag it for you.
      linkinfo.dll 5.1.2600.2751 - Current
      shell32.dll 6.0.2900.2763 - Replaced By KB928255 6.0.2900.3051
      shlwapi.dll 6.0.2900.2753 - Current
      winsrv.dll 5.1.2600.2751 - Current
      xpsp3res.dll 5.1.2600.2764 - Replaced By KB928255 5.1.2600.3051


    • KB902400 Required. And it is listed in the first post in this thread:
      KB902400 -› Vulnerabilities in MS DTC and COM+ Could Allow Remote Code Execution
      Download -› 4.70 MB (August 10, 2005)
      Switches: KB902400.exe /q /n /z
    • KB914389: Required, nothing has replaced this update. No clue why it's not flagged for you.
      mrxsmb.sys   5.1.2600.2902 - Current
      rdbss.sys 5.1.2600.2902 - Current


    • KB939373: Windows Update doesn't list this one for me either. However it has a newer .dll version.
      w3svc.dll	5.1.2600.3163 - Current (stock version is 5.1.2600.2180)


    • KB917953: Required, nothing has replaced this update. No clue why it's not flagged for you.
      tcpip.sys	5.1.2600.2892 - Current


    • KB918118: Required, nothing has replaced this update. No clue why it's not flagged for you.
      msftedit.dll 5.41.15.1514 - Current
      riched20.dll 5.30.23.1228 - Current


    • KB891122: I'm still testing if installing WMP11 makes this obsolete. I'll post back when I leanr more.

[*] Myself, I rely on three lists:

  1. Windows Update Downloader (WUD)
  2. This Thread
  3. Microsoft/Windows Update

I also sometimes resort to extracting updates and comparing files. There are also many updates not listed on any of these lists which, IMO, are important. I found a list of some of these a long time ago (can't remember where now). But I have verified through file version comparison, that many are still valid today. Most of these fix specific issues where a combination of things must conspire to trigger an issue. In the end, it is your computer, so do your home work!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

KB939673 is for IIS. If you have XP Home, that would be why it's not showing up for you. Also, I never noticed KB891122 on the list. It will be removed.

While I was typing this post, I realized I forgot another IIS update for XP. The list will be updated immediately.

the_guy

EDIT: KB891122 was not on the list. KB917537 has been added for XP SP2.

Edited by the_guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies. I've just confirmed that using another method, i've got WU to report that i need the updates i previously reported i didn't. I did this is by leaving off every update from the slipstream except IE7 and WMP11 and checking in with WU. All the updates that you said should be there, were there. Curious, very curious.

Edited by soporific
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi the_guy :hello:

How many Updates in the list of WinXP SP2 for now ? :lol:

I'm taking a long time to count all the updates in the list

it is the second time i alert you to update the Number at the top. please

and thank you Very Much for your effort

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just i ask you before to update the total number of the updates in the list (win xp SP2). you will find that if you read a few posts above :blushing:

The tot Number of the updates in the list is very important to me to be sure that i have all the updates

i feel that i have something wrong when the list total number not the same number i have

i think its (86) for now. if i'm not wrong

anyway, thank you very much

Edited by NaDer_GenKO
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear all,

I'm newbie here. Currently i'm using Win2k Pro SP4 then i need to download the hotfix.

My question is, do i need to request those hotfix from Microsoft via phone?

If is it, where do i get the "support id" that needed by Microsoft ?

Or there is other way to download the hotfix ?

Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear all,

I'm newbie here. Currently i'm using Win2k Pro SP4 then i need to download the hotfix.

My question is, do i need to request those hotfix from Microsoft via phone?

If is it, where do i get the "support id" that needed by Microsoft ?

Or there is other way to download the hotfix ?

Thank you.

Four questions, four answers... kinda...

1) Which Hotifx?

2) Which Hotfix?

3) The Support ID would be a number associated with a Support account that you have already established with Microsoft. There is no generic Support ID that someone could share with you.

4) Which Hotfix?

- John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

KB936357 got updated on October 22th

KB936357-V2

Please be careful when installing KB936357 V2 for XP SP2. The original KB936357 patch for XP SP2 caused XP machines to be UNBOOTABLE, crashing with a BSOD at startup with certain CPUs. Not sure if KB936357 V2 is reliable enough now that MS article 936357 acknowledges that the patch is NOT supported on machines with Intel Family 5 (perhaps pentium 3) and older CPUs.

See this article here.

I'm not letting ANY of my XP and Vista computers touch KB936357, following the advice of a certain Windows critic to avoid KB936357. period! nuff said.

-erpdude

Edited by erpdude8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please be careful when installing KB936357 V2 for XP SP2. The original KB936357 patch for XP SP2 caused XP machines to be UNBOOTABLE, crashing with a BSOD at startup with certain CPUs. Not sure if KB936357 V2 is reliable enough now that MS article 936357 acknowledges that the patch is NOT supported on machines with Intel Family 5 (perhaps pentium 3) and older CPUs.
According to Wikipedia, "Family 5" Intel microprocesors are Pentium I and Pentium MMX (up to 300 MHz). By the way, I've installed KB936357 on tens of machines (both Intels and AMDs, all the way down to 600 MHz) without problems.
See this article here.
While Woody's place is valuable source of information, it isn't exactly 'scientific' or 'programmers' treasure - just news collected from Internet. I've been following it for over a year.

GL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...