jvidal Posted October 16, 2009 Share Posted October 16, 2009 Also, clean your Hotfixes, you have redudant ones, eg: 972260 and 974455... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emzendron Posted October 16, 2009 Share Posted October 16, 2009 (edited) Sorry... With the O version i have the wpdshext problem, but not the mfplat.dll and wmp11.inf. Edited October 16, 2009 by emzendron Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jvidal Posted October 16, 2009 Share Posted October 16, 2009 (edited) p version fixes the wpdshext.res problem. works 100% for me (though I'm not including MSI 4.5)Although that's weird, rev m and rev p work fine. it's rev n and o that give the wpdshext.res error.You should re-check your HF list and clean it up. Edited October 16, 2009 by jvidal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emzendron Posted October 16, 2009 Share Posted October 16, 2009 Also, clean your Hotfixes, you have redudant ones, eg: 972260 and 974455...But they will appear in WU... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jvidal Posted October 16, 2009 Share Posted October 16, 2009 No, they won't: KB974455 is a cumulative update, it REPLACES KB972260.PLEASE recheck your HF list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emzendron Posted October 16, 2009 Share Posted October 16, 2009 I'd tested 2 times... Anyway.... Do you have a list (site) where i can see wich new HF replaces the old ones?Thankz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommyp Posted October 16, 2009 Share Posted October 16, 2009 I'd tested 2 times... Anyway.... Do you have a list (site) where i can see wich new HF replaces the old ones?Thankz.hotfix 099 - http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/current.aspx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emzendron Posted October 16, 2009 Share Posted October 16, 2009 (edited) I remade the process... and guess what? Now it's working... I don't know what cause the error, but i should have done something stupid...Thankz. Edited October 16, 2009 by emzendron Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jvidal Posted October 16, 2009 Share Posted October 16, 2009 (edited) yeah, like including unneeded/obsolete/redundant hotfixes.Just for kicks, I rebuilt using beta q and everything went just fine, no errors whatsoever.Although I didn't include MSI 4.5 (is it really necessary??? I don't think so)bye!(and thx again, tommyp) Edited October 16, 2009 by jvidal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acheron Posted October 17, 2009 Share Posted October 17, 2009 (edited) Many thanks for Windows Installer 4.5 support!I have tested Windows Installer 4.5 using Dutch Windows XP Pro SP3 including Windows Media Player 11, Internet Explorer 8 and all security and other hotfixes and everything works flawlessly!HFSLIP_revQ.zipIt's a shame Microsoft still haven't fixed their Windows Installer 4.5 installer as all included files have no valid digital signature. When installing Windows Installer 4.5 manually you would get big trouble whenever sfc reverts to Windows Installer 3.1 files.Using HFSLIP SFC reports no errors to the user or asks for CD's, except the event log will contain notices.@jvidal. MSI 4.5 isn't required, but is much faster than MSI 3.1 and contains additional features. Edited October 17, 2009 by Acheron Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jvidal Posted October 17, 2009 Share Posted October 17, 2009 It is?I have it installed, but I did so manually, I do not put on my slipstreamed CDs.Maybe I should...now that it is handled correctly...thx! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommyp Posted October 17, 2009 Share Posted October 17, 2009 New beta R is up that addresses some 2k WMP and WM hotfixes. The changes do not affect XP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gluon Posted October 18, 2009 Share Posted October 18, 2009 nice release tommyp, MSI 4.5 is neatly slipstreamed ever since downloading DX9 August 2009 I just realised some DX11 runtime is included. The new dx11 dlls are slipstreamed perfectly and there is also a new library d3dcsx.So I've got a feature request for a d3dcsx slipstream if you don't mind. The following modification is just a suggestion and most probably not be the best way of doing things.Line 2144 needs to be modified to IF EXIST HFCABS\*d3d*_x86.cab FOR /F %%I IN ('DIR/B/A-D/ON HFCABS\*d3d*_x86.cab') DO EXPAND HFCABS\%%I -F:* WORK\DX9EXTRA >NULand the following should be added to line 2167 (after D3DCompiler slipstream)IF EXIST WORK\DX9EXTRA\d3dcsx* FOR /F "TOKENS=2* DELIMS=_" %%I IN ('DIR/B/A-D/ON WORK\DX9EXTRA\d3dcsx*.dll') DO ( REN WORK\DX9EXTRA\d3dcsx_%%I d3dcsx_%%I ECHO>>SOURCESS\I386\TXTSETUP.SIF d3dcsx_%%I = 1,,,,,,,2,0,0,d3dcsx_%%I&ECHO>>SOURCESS\I386\DOSNET.INF d1,d3dcsx_%%I) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomalak Posted October 18, 2009 Share Posted October 18, 2009 Hello,Just wanted to let you know that in a another hfslip run (with version "r" this time) I had several files in the textmode phase of setup with the "could not be copied" error message. Files seemed not to be related to each other or to all belong to the same patch. Nothing changed compared to my previous attempts (except that I this time installed on a real system instead of a virtual one), so I'm really puzzled.Not a big problem, as all these files (6 or 7 IIRC, among them "advpack.dll.mui", "jscript.dll.mui") were translation files only, i.e. "<something>.mui", but strange nevertheless. By the way, "wpdshext.res" was not affected this time.What's going on here? Can someone confirm, or is this something only I experience with the new beta? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acheron Posted October 18, 2009 Share Posted October 18, 2009 Have you actually checked if all these extra DirectX dll's are actually installed by default on Windows XP? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now