Jump to content

Strange bug


RJARRRPCGP

Recommended Posts

With Windows 98 SE, (probably other versions of Windows 9x too)

if the swap file is set to bigger than 768 MB, Windows then refuses to continue with the error message saying that there's insufficient memory to run Windows and to disable some stuff in config.sys and autoexec.bat.

But, the swap file isn't physical memory! So why does that matter? :realmad:

This is NOT RAM I'm talking about, it's just the swap file size! :realmad:

Has anyone else seen this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


With Windows 98 SE, (probably other versions of Windows 9x too)

if the swap file is set to bigger than 768 MB, Windows then refuses to continue with the error message saying that there's insufficient memory to run Windows and to disable some stuff in config.sys and autoexec.bat.

Certainly not with WinME as I always have a swap of fixed size (1GB) and never got such a problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Windows 98 SE, (probably other versions of Windows 9x too)

if the swap file is set to bigger than 768 MB, Windows then refuses to continue with the error message saying that there's insufficient memory to run Windows and to disable some stuff in config.sys and autoexec.bat.

But, the swap file isn't physical memory! So why does that matter? :realmad:

This is NOT RAM I'm talking about, it's just the swap file size! :realmad:

Has anyone else seen this?

Are you experimenting to find the upper limit, or do you need a fixed size

swap file that large?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RJARRRPCGP

Do you have Win98 installed on FAT or FAT32 ?

FAT32

With Windows 98 SE, (probably other versions of Windows 9x too)

if the swap file is set to bigger than 768 MB, Windows then refuses to continue with the error message saying that there's insufficient memory to run Windows and to disable some stuff in config.sys and autoexec.bat.

But, the swap file isn't physical memory! So why does that matter? :realmad:

This is NOT RAM I'm talking about, it's just the swap file size! :realmad:

Has anyone else seen this?

Are you experimenting to find the upper limit, or do you need a fixed size

swap file that large?

I discovered this by accident when wondering which fixed swap file size to set.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...