Martin L Posted November 29, 2005 Posted November 29, 2005 http://www.pc-tools.net/win32/md5sums/GoogleIt! thats not the same program... its dos based.
Tarun Posted November 29, 2005 Author Posted November 29, 2005 http://www.pc-tools.net/win32/md5sums/GoogleIt! thats not the same program... its dos based.Yep. That was why I asked.
DigeratiPrime Posted November 29, 2005 Posted November 29, 2005 Off topic: Got a link for that app, Digerati?sure http://www.md5summer.org/
Tarun Posted November 30, 2005 Author Posted November 30, 2005 Off topic: Got a link for that app, Digerati?sure http://www.md5summer.org/Thank you sir!
Nerwin Posted November 30, 2005 Posted November 30, 2005 YES i downloaded it and works fine, Much more better,Faster, safer, better pop up blocking too!
prathapml Posted November 30, 2005 Posted November 30, 2005 (edited) Ummm..... better, faster, safer.... as compared to what? Hopefully you dont mean as compared to RC3!If you are an existing firefox user, then you should know that its the same build since 3 weeks. The final is the same as RC3, & its build-date is 11th November 2005, as the about box says. Edited November 30, 2005 by prathapml
Martijn Posted November 30, 2005 Posted November 30, 2005 I think he means compared to IE or FF 1.0.7
EchoNoise Posted November 30, 2005 Posted November 30, 2005 Nyeh... I'm still running Deer Park Alpha 2 (a.k.a FF 1.60a)The webpage that firefox lives though is pretty **** cool
Nerwin Posted November 30, 2005 Posted November 30, 2005 I think he means compared to IE or FF 1.0.7Thats what i ment.
Nanaki Posted November 30, 2005 Posted November 30, 2005 Nyeh... I'm still running Deer Park Alpha 2 (a.k.a FF 1.60a)The webpage that firefox lives though is pretty **** cool FF1.6a is the pre-alpha version of 2.0. You're running ahead.
Rhelic Posted November 30, 2005 Posted November 30, 2005 (edited) Ummm..... better, faster, safer.... as compared to what? Hopefully you dont mean as compared to RC3!What makes this version seem faster is my favorite new feature in FF 1.5 (something that's bugged me about Web Browsers for years). When you hit back or forward your browser makes a new request for the page and re-submits any form variables. While your CSS/JS/Images are cached, the web page itself is re-requested, what FF 1.5 is doing (that as far as I've know nobody has done before) is using the cached copy of the web page, so when you hit Back or Forward, no internet access is used. Edited November 30, 2005 by Rhelic
SiMoNsAyS Posted November 30, 2005 Posted November 30, 2005 i think i've been out for more time than necessary many thanks for the info
Zxian Posted November 30, 2005 Posted November 30, 2005 What makes this version seem faster is my favorite new feature in FF 1.5 (something that's bugged me about Web Browsers for years). When you hit back or forward your browser makes a new request for the page and re-submits any form variables. While your CSS/JS/Images are cached, the web page itself is re-requested, what FF 1.5 is doing (that as far as I've know nobody has done before) is using the cached copy of the web page, so when you hit Back or Forward, no internet access is used.Not to be a troll, but this feature has been in Opera for a while now. (I know it's been in 8, not sure about 7)Don't get me wrong. I think that it's a good thing that everyone is picking up on useful features from the others, and hopefully the security conference where everyone is coming together to discuss web browser security will produce something beneficial for everyone.It's a big update by the looks of things. Can't stop progress.
prathapml Posted November 30, 2005 Posted November 30, 2005 Nyeh... I'm still running Deer Park Alpha 2 (a.k.a FF 1.60a)FYI, that build is a bit older than firefox 1.5The 1.5 build that you see today, is further along the dev-trunk, than deer-park-a2.what FF 1.5 is doing (that as far as I've know nobody has done before) is using the cached copy of the web page, so when you hit Back or Forward, no internet access is used.Opera's had this since v6.x - in other words, I've been enjoying it since back when firefox was not even born - 2001 - 4 years.
Gouki Posted December 9, 2005 Posted December 9, 2005 Using Cache is not necesserly good. In case you are in a Forum (Like here at MSFN), you wont get New Posts in case there were any when you press Back.I prefer using Internet Access, to get the page refreshed.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now