Zxian Posted October 28, 2005 Share Posted October 28, 2005 No you don't need to repackage it... but my silent installer is a whole 10KB smaller than the original!!! Thanks for the silent switch. You might wanna post that in the Applications Installs section for other members. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
staples Posted October 28, 2005 Share Posted October 28, 2005 if you want to deploy it via the msi.expand it dotnetfx.exe /c /t:"C:\dotnet2\"get the transformhttp://www.zyard.com/index_files/free.htm or http://www.zyard.com/files/dotnet2.mstinstall itmsiexec /i netfx.msi TRANSFORMS=DOTNET2.MST /qb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boooggy Posted October 28, 2005 Share Posted October 28, 2005 thanx staples!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sonu27 Posted October 28, 2005 Share Posted October 28, 2005 There are quite a few programs that don't work with this, only v1.1.I hope nLite isn't one.If it is please change it to the new version. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incroyable HULK Posted October 28, 2005 Share Posted October 28, 2005 No you don't need to repackage it... but my silent installer is a whole 10KB smaller than the original!!! WoW 10KB !!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weed Posted October 28, 2005 Share Posted October 28, 2005 (edited) i have removed 1.1 and installed 2.0no problems here with nlitedont have other programs to test... Edited October 28, 2005 by Weed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sonu27 Posted October 30, 2005 Share Posted October 30, 2005 (edited) Thats good then.But I removed v2. LOLI email a person about his program not working with v2 but it works with v1.1. Could anyone tell me if the following is correct?At 15:34 27/10/2005 -0400, you wrote: > >I've just installed .NET framework version 2.0, just came out >today. > >And I downloaded your program. Said that you neen version 1.1 or >higher. > >Please fix this issue, thanks! Well, it's not really an issue. .NET 2.0 is not compatible with 1.1 -- they're quite fundamentally different. You will need to have .NET 1.1 installed as well. Since you can install it side-by-side with 2.0 then there shouldn't be any problems. ("1.1 or higher", incidentally, just means 1.x (but not 1.0). If they had released a 1.2 it would have worked with that. But 2.0 is an entirely different kettle of fish.) -- Gavin Lambert, Mirality Systems http://www.mirality.co.nz/Thanks. The program is http://www.mirality.co.nz/maxcode.php MAX Manager. Edited October 30, 2005 by sonu27 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomcat76 Posted November 9, 2005 Share Posted November 9, 2005 Just wondering... I downloaded the silent installer and installed it first to test. An additional folder is created inside Microsoft.NET, but I didn't find any shortcuts to the new version (there are links to v1.1 in Administrative Tools but not for v2.0). Is this normal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solid as a rock Posted November 13, 2005 Share Posted November 13, 2005 hmmmYou don't need to repackage it, unless I missed something, it will install silently without rebooting with this command:dotnetfx.exe /q:a /c:"install /l /q"Worked for my 32bit install. Haven't tested x64 yet, will get to that tomorrow.so i need to download the redistable framework 2.0 and install it with your switches and there will be no problems? (as if hotfix and SP packs and tweaks?)i also read some thing about conflicting 1.1 and 2.0 when installed after each other at one moment? could someone tell me more?also, i have a problem with my slipstreamed framework 1.1, could someone help me with that? http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?showto...71entry419571 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JASpurrier3 Posted November 13, 2005 Share Posted November 13, 2005 This is for people with slow internet connections or people who do not want to worry about faulty installers. This is a Patch to change the original DOTNETFX.exe (v2.0) to a silent install suitable for Unattended Windows Installations. All it changes is the command executed to install .NET Framework. It does not even mess with the microsoft digital signature. Enjoy!DotNetFXv2.0Patch.exe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
favorini Posted November 23, 2005 Share Posted November 23, 2005 Passing the /l argument to install.exe will create a verbose MSI log file in %TEMP%.If you want to put the log file somewhere else, you can use this:dotnetfx.exe /q:a /c:"install.exe /q /l X:\logdir\dotnet.log"If the path to your log file has a space, use this:dotnetfx.exe /q:a /c:"install.exe /q /l ""X:\dir with space\dotnet.log""" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MastaVR6 Posted February 22, 2006 Share Posted February 22, 2006 (edited) Just wondering... I downloaded the silent installer and installed it first to test. An additional folder is created inside Microsoft.NET, but I didn't find any shortcuts to the new version (there are links to v1.1 in Administrative Tools but not for v2.0). Is this normal?I'm also slave to the missing icons in the admintools folder, what gives? -Answer : The SDK is required for viewing the security via a GUI.See this link http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/2bc0cxhc.aspx Edited February 22, 2006 by MastaVR6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiki Burgh Posted May 8, 2006 Share Posted May 8, 2006 I haven't heard of any conflicts between the two versions. I have heard of people using only .NET 2.0 and running into problems... but then again, I'm not the be-all-and-end-all of info. Anyways... I made a new installer for English only. It's a bit smaller than the full version, so for those people who need to squeeze every KB out of their UA CDs, this is for you. I've tested it myself without any errors, but as always, let me know if you find any..NET Framework 2.0 Silent Installer - English Only - 22.3 MBEnjoy!hi sir!i am new to this thread ...i just want to report that the package doesn't seem to work for me via HFSLIP ...i've read that for some it does but for me, it's otherwise ... i might de doing something wrong here but i think not ...i always end up having to install the MS package after installing XP ... apps that require it report needing to install 2.0 for these to work ... it didn't integrate successfully as some apps still look for an installation of dotnetfx 2 ... apart from it not being present in Add or Remove Programs, this is what i see in the event viewer when i verify:Product: Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 -- Error 1406.Could not write value DW0200 to key \Software\Microsoft\PCHealth\ErrorReporting\DW\Installed. System error . Verify that you have sufficient access to that key, or contact your support personnel.For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.btw, i run 1.1 & 2.0 one after the other (as i have them both in the process of installation via svcpak) ... looking forward to your feedback ...thanks much!-kiki- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glowy Posted May 9, 2006 Share Posted May 9, 2006 (edited) if you want to deploy it via the msi.expand it dotnetfx.exe /c /t:"C:\dotnet2\"get the transformhttp://www.zyard.com/index_files/free.htm or http://www.zyard.com/files/dotnet2.mstinstall itmsiexec /i netfx.msi TRANSFORMS=DOTNET2.MST /qbWhy use the .MST?the only thing that does is set the public properties ADDEPLOY=1 and REBOOT=REALLYSUPPRESSno need for an .MST just use the public properties:msiexec /i netfx.msi /qb ADDEPLOY=1 REBOOT=REALLYSUPPRESS Edited May 9, 2006 by Glowy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ophiel Posted May 9, 2006 Share Posted May 9, 2006 i got suckered into reading an old thread, i want my 5 minutes back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now