Gape Posted April 7, 2005 Author Share Posted April 7, 2005 Ive been choosing to keep the newer version already being used for testing the sesp. Or should I be installing the older version instead? I found the uninstallation problem was fixed. Is it now safe to restart when the sesp2.0rc3 installation prompts the user for to restart the computer?I have run into some problems with 98lite sleek though. The uninstallation of sesp2.0rc3 is causing some odd things to happen. Ill try to explain this better soon...still need to look at it more to figure out what is going on.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Nabtsfec.sys problem is not important. If you have DirectX 8+, you should keep your newer file.Uninstallation on 98lite sleek should work, if there is a problem, this must be related with EXPLORER.EXE or SHELL32.DLL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fredledingue Posted April 8, 2005 Share Posted April 8, 2005 Just tested it on an old P200: Works great! Great job!Gape, did you fix the IDE drivers problem I had with rc2? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ssmokee Posted April 8, 2005 Share Posted April 8, 2005 Uninstallation on 98lite sleek should work, if there is a problem, this must be related with EXPLORER.EXE or SHELL32.DLL.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>It looks that way. I know that COMDLG32.DLL, EXPLORER.EXE, and SHELL32.DLL are required for 98lite to install the sleek shell. I looked at those three files at various points of a single clean installation.# After a 98lite chubby installCOMDLG32 DLL 176,128 04-23-99 10:22p COMDLG32.DLLEXPLORER EXE 180,224 04-23-99 10:22p EXPLORER.EXESHELL32 DLL 1,400,832 04-23-99 10:22p SHELL32.DLL# After performing shell swap to sleekCOMDLG32 DLL 92,672 08-24-96 11:11a COMDLG32.DLLEXPLORER EXE 204,288 05-16-04 5:46a EXPLORER.EXESHELL32 DLL 819,200 08-24-96 11:11a SHELL32.DLLSHELL32 W98 1,400,832 04-23-99 10:22p SHELL32.W98# After installing sesp2.0rc3COMDLG32 DLL 92,672 08-24-96 11:11a COMDLG32.DLLEXPLORER EXE 204,288 05-16-04 5:46a EXPLORER.EXESHELL32 DLL 819,200 08-24-96 11:11a SHELL32.DLLSHELL32 W98 1,388,816 12-06-01 11:25p SHELL32.W98# After uninstalling sesp2.0rc3COMDLG32 DLL 92,672 08-24-96 11:11a COMDLG32.DLLEXPLORER EXE 180,224 04-23-99 10:22p EXPLORER.EXESHELL32 DLL 1,400,832 04-23-99 10:22p SHELL32.DLLSHELL32 W98 1,388,816 12-06-01 11:25p SHELL32.W98After uninstalling the sesp it didnt put the older 95 versions of explorer.exe and shell32.dll. The .w98 file I assume is just created by 98lite to backup the newer version of shell32.dll. I was able to resync those files by shell swapping to chubby, then back to sleek. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
notinthisworld Posted April 8, 2005 Share Posted April 8, 2005 hi... just an opinion, i think the usb mass storage suport should not be removed... thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gape Posted April 8, 2005 Author Share Posted April 8, 2005 Gape, did you fix the IDE drivers problem I had with rc2?I hope so. (I couldn't reproduce this problem on my system, so I couldn't test it.)After uninstalling the sesp it didnt put the older 95 versions of explorer.exe and shell32.dll. The .w98 file I assume is just created by 98lite to backup the newer version of shell32.dll. I was able to those files by shell swapping to chubby, then back to sleek.Thanks for great feedback. It looks like that the uninstallation on the sleek is broken. I'll fix it soon.hi... just an opinion, i think the usb mass storage suport should not be removed... thanksMaybe, you're right. But SP 2.0 will not contain it. Maybe it or a better USB storage support returns on the next version. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelzy Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 Thanks Gape for the release !!..... i was just thinking about doin a fresh install actually pretty soon this SP is totally AWSOME Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fredledingue Posted April 9, 2005 Share Posted April 9, 2005 GapeI hope so. (I couldn't reproduce this problem on my system, so I couldn't test it.)Nor do I. I'm FFMC now, but I have installed rc3 on another PC without any kind of problem. I will be able to return to the PC with the problem in only 2 or 3 weeks, if you want, I will test it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simon109s Posted April 10, 2005 Share Posted April 10, 2005 Hi all,I'm not sure if anyone has encounter the same problem as I do. My windows now is 98se + 20rc3. The problem is sometime when it boots, it will lead itself into 'safe' mode. I did realize at first. I simply reboot & most of the time 98se will resume normal. Last night, again it booted to 'safe' mode and I checked it out see if it really in safe mode but it's not. I'm not sure why it didn't load graphic driver, it only ran on 16 color. The rest seems ok because I pluged in my thumb dive and it deteced.My graphic card driver is nvidia driver;66.94. A Geforce card; mx-400.Does has the similar problem? Please advise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDGx Posted April 10, 2005 Share Posted April 10, 2005 please see next post below Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDGx Posted April 10, 2005 Share Posted April 10, 2005 I've sent SP 2.0 RC3 to Jim + Tim @ MajorGeeks:http://www.majorgeeks.com/Jim + Tim are very cool guys, and their web site rocks. B)Gape:They have just added RC3 to their servers, so you can add another mirror to your list:http://www.majorgeeks.com/download4131.htmlJim also told me they are going to add a new European server soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gape Posted April 11, 2005 Author Share Posted April 11, 2005 Hi all,I'm not sure if anyone has encounter the same problem as I do. My windows now is 98se + 20rc3. The problem is sometime when it boots, it will lead itself into 'safe' mode. I did realize at first. I simply reboot & most of the time 98se will resume normal. Last night, again it booted to 'safe' mode and I checked it out see if it really in safe mode but it's not. I'm not sure why it didn't load graphic driver, it only ran on 16 color. The rest seems ok because I pluged in my thumb dive and it deteced.My graphic card driver is nvidia driver;66.94. A Geforce card; mx-400.Does has the similar problem? Please advise. <{POST_SNAPBACK}>There should be a BOOTLOG.TXT file in your root directory (C:\). Could you check it? (Or you can send it to me.)Also if you have any non-Intel mainboard like VIA, you should install your mainboard's latest drivers.MDGx, thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simon109s Posted April 12, 2005 Share Posted April 12, 2005 Hi Gape,Thx for the reply. I observe more to find out how and why after I posted the enquiry. Ok, here what I have been tried; it seems every few time power up, at least one time it'll load to 16 color and when I did a restart, it'll resume normal.But when I power down my 98PC. The next time I powered up again, most likely it'll go to 16 color and resorted on restart. It looks to me likely it does not load the graphic driver correctly when first power up. I wonder why...even thought i update my nvidia to 71.84. Gape, here is my 98SE boot.ini contain;--deleted-- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gape Posted April 12, 2005 Author Share Posted April 12, 2005 But when I power down my 98PC. The next time I powered up again, most likely it'll go to 16 color and resorted on restart. It looks to me likely it does not load the graphic driver correctly when first power up. I wonder why...even thought i update my nvidia to 71.84. Gape, here is my 98SE boot.ini contain;--deleted--<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Interesting problem, but I said "BOOTLOG.TXT", not "BOOT.INI". (Note: It is in the C:\, and sometimes BOOTLOG.TXT file is marked as hidden.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simon109s Posted April 12, 2005 Share Posted April 12, 2005 but I said "BOOTLOG.TXT", not "BOOT.INI".Oops..sorry Gape. I guess I was too hurry. I couldn't find the bootlog in my drive c and windows. I took a snapshot on my drive c. Hope it helps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gape Posted April 12, 2005 Author Share Posted April 12, 2005 I couldn't find the bootlog in my drive c and windows. I took a snapshot on my drive c. Hope it helps.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Open your computer, and immediately after BIOS screen press F8 to show boot menu. In this menu, select logged startup. After that, you will probably have a BOOTLOG.TXT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now