dimava Posted December 31, 2004 Share Posted December 31, 2004 Everything on this site points to putting the install files in the $OEM$ dir and then have setup copy the files, and then install it. Wouldn't it just be easier to have the batch scripts install from the DVD? Or am I missing a big advantage of copying it first?tnxDimava Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astalavista Posted December 31, 2004 Share Posted December 31, 2004 If u READ the guide it will tell u how to install from DVD or CD withoutcopying to the %systemdrive%pls go to http://unattended.msfn.organd read http://unattended.msfn.org/xp/runonceex_cd.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dimava Posted December 31, 2004 Author Share Posted December 31, 2004 Dude im not asking how to do it, I'm asking if there is an advantage of copying it to the hard drive rather than running it from cd.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mythosaz Posted December 31, 2004 Share Posted December 31, 2004 A combination of both is generally what's best.But, yes, absolutely. Make a batch file with a for %%i loop that tries to find the CD/DVD source of your files, and then installs them all from there.I launch mine at GuiRunOnce from a batch file I deposited from $OEM$, but mostly because I need a full compliment of system services running, want a rollback point, etc. YMMV launching yours from any setup point you want with either pre-copied files or from-CD files.EDIT: Since it wasn't clear, yes, I have all of my files to be installed in an \INSTALL directory on the drive. I use a for loop in my batch to find WIN51.SP2 on the CD. The final set of instructions in my .CMD file is to place a runonce .REG file that cleans up the batch installer I deposited on the drive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astalavista Posted December 31, 2004 Share Posted December 31, 2004 I hv nothing copy to the hard drive. Everything is on the DVDdrivers, programs, all the s*** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
durex Posted December 31, 2004 Share Posted December 31, 2004 I think the only reason the uA guide originally points to using $OEM$ method is perhaps its a bit easier to understand than using variables and FOR loops.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alanoll Posted December 31, 2004 Share Posted December 31, 2004 I think the only reason the uA guide originally points to using $OEM$ method is perhaps its a bit easier to understand than using variables and FOR loops....exactly, and that's how it's staying. It's better to get an understanding of whats goin on then to just jump into the more complex parts. It'd be like jumping into the deep end of a pool without learning how to swim in the shallow end...for most people it doesn't work.As for advantage...It depends on your rig. True you save the time it takes to transfer files from the CD to the HDD in the beginning, but if you're DVDdrive is slow or anything, seeking the files at installation could slow things down. But I find that it's cleaner to just install from CD as then I don't have to worry about cleaning up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesas Posted December 31, 2004 Share Posted December 31, 2004 well besides copying 1.6 gigs of data during setup ive made it so users can reinstall there software at anytime Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astalavista Posted December 31, 2004 Share Posted December 31, 2004 I just put the files on the server. If they need it they ask me.You dont want the user to have access to those software. and bring it home. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now