bledd Posted December 24, 2006 Share Posted December 24, 2006 holy thread revival!using notepad2 here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimmsta Posted December 26, 2006 Share Posted December 26, 2006 I prefer Notepad++, as it's opensource, supports Win9x, and offers practically everything that ConTEXT offers, except it's a bit more stable than ConTEXT.I've used Metapad, and Notepad2. Of those two, notepad2 is far better IMHO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdoe Posted December 26, 2006 Share Posted December 26, 2006 (edited) I'm another Notepad2 user because it is self contain into a single exe. It is a very smooth syntax highlighting for coding purpose. Support ASCII and UNICODE. And it is very stable.The only thing that was annoying to me was the message "Are you sure you want to open this large file...". I removed this message by patching offset 56ECh from 7338 to EB38 (version 1.0.12).I tried all the others text editors mentionned but they are too much for my needs. BTW, one bad side about Notepad2... it seems to be no development on it anymore. Edited December 26, 2006 by jdoe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E-66 Posted December 26, 2006 Share Posted December 26, 2006 I've never tried any of these replacement Notepads apps.... are they capable of more than Wordpad? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
celtish Posted December 26, 2006 Share Posted December 26, 2006 I've never tried any of these replacement Notepads apps.... are they capable of more than Wordpad?The basic differences are(1) Wordpad has a greater capacity than the standard Windows notepad(2) Wordpad text can be formatted whereas the standard notepad cannotNote that some of the third-party notepads (e.g. metapad) have capabilities beyond those of the standard notepad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E-66 Posted December 27, 2006 Share Posted December 27, 2006 The basic differences are(1) Wordpad has a greater capacity than the standard Windows notepad(2) Wordpad text can be formatted whereas the standard notepad cannot1. I know2. I knowNote that some of the third-party notepads (e.g. metapad) have capabilities beyond those of the standard notepad.Right, that's what I'm asking about - how does Wordpad compare to the replacement Notepads? I don't use Notepad, I just use Wordpad. What do the replacement Notepads offer that Wordpad doesn't? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BenoitRen Posted December 27, 2006 Share Posted December 27, 2006 When I open plain text files with Wordpad, I don't get a horizontal scrollbar. Plus it loads slower, and has a funky mouse selection method. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E-66 Posted December 27, 2006 Share Posted December 27, 2006 When I open plain text files with Wordpad, I don't get a horizontal scrollbar.Wordwrap on/off in options for text settings?Plus it loads slower...What, a few hundreths of a second?...and has a funky mouse selection method.I don't know what that means. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BenoitRen Posted December 27, 2006 Share Posted December 27, 2006 Wordwrap on/off in options for text settings?Off. It's plain text after all.What, a few hundreths of a second?Notepad: appears instantlyWordpad: 3 secondsKeep in mind that I'm on a Pentium II 233 Mhz PC here.I don't know what that means.Try selecting exactly the letters you want when there are slashes or full stops nearby. You have to see it for yourself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
celtish Posted December 28, 2006 Share Posted December 28, 2006 Note that some of the third-party notepads (e.g. metapad) have capabilities beyond those of the standard notepad.Right, that's what I'm asking about - how does Wordpad compare to the replacement Notepads? I don't use Notepad, I just use Wordpad. What do the replacement Notepads offer that Wordpad doesn't?Your aim should be to try out the various replacement notepads and see which one suits you best. Checking through this thread will give you a good idea of what is out there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarun Posted December 28, 2006 Share Posted December 28, 2006 I prefer Notepad++, as it's opensource, supports Win9x, and offers practically everything that ConTEXT offers, except it's a bit more stable than ConTEXT.I've used Metapad, and Notepad2. Of those two, notepad2 is far better IMHO.Agreed, I use and prefer it now over many; including UltraEdit32. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NL-Stitch Posted December 28, 2006 Share Posted December 28, 2006 I am using Notepad++ for batch files, PHP and more. Notepad++ gives the script different collors etc., so you can check if you forgot a ";" or something.Greetings,NL-Stitch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaymo Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 i myself use metapad and have for quite some time. used notepad2 briefly and it was pretty cool with the colorizing.i had some problem with tab (probably user prob ) and switched back.still have a copy somewhere, haven't really used pfe; (just haven't fiddle-farted with it.) have it somewhere too.everything i do(which isn't much) i use metapad for. i don't even really recall anymore what all features it has.i use remove trailing space, convert-uppercase/lowercase, the links. that's about it.i'm actually checking this thread out to see what's different out there. here's some things that i've been curious about lately.sorting lines/selecting columns/maybe tabs(like kmeleon or firefox?)/multiple text storage maybe(not sure what to call it).now if i just get off my butt and take a closer look at some of these, that'd help. i don't think there is a "best" notepad out there. we all have different interests. what people don't normally use could easily be considered useless bloat by them. even tho' i'm curious about some of the features i mentioned, i may decide no... i like a little bit smaller notepad.and it's true; what we are talking about is normally for simple text. anything more... scripting, programming, etc. may have a more useful app for it. me? i just use metapad, keep it in my quicklaunch.i have to say i am really pleased that this thread has kept a positive attitude. some i've seen are quite horrendous.kudos to everyone here. -jaymo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HyperHacker Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 Textpad is great, but it's no Notepad replacement. (BTW, it has Block Select Mode which lets you select columns or blocks of text, as someone asked.) Personally, I'm fine with XP's Notepad for simple things; I guess there's no way to use it in Win98? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BenoitRen Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 NotepadEx doesn't really support Unicode, it seems. I'm using Unired now when I need Unicode support. But it's quite slow, so I looked at a couple other Notepad replacements.Notepad2 - Requires IE4+ SHLWAPI.DLL because of an unresolved dependency.Metapad - Requires RICHED20.DLL. I downloaded the recommended one, and then it ran. But no real Unicode support.The reason I need Unicode is because I'm converting a site that uses Japanese characters for the Japanese titles of games. If only SeaMonkey's Composer used a good DOCTYPE and didn't destroy the mark-up you feed it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now